[jo kus]

I copied another's comment that said..."If the seat of Rome is "vacant"

You responded "...No one here has stated that, and you didn't even have to read the whole letter to see to whom it is addressed." followed by "Why don't you read the letter instead of attacking things it doesn't say."


Good advice. I think you have me confused with the poster that I was responding to. I never stated that I thought that the AUTHOR implied there was no Pope, merely that the Sedevacantists should explain their position. If you are one, please explain how you are different than a Protestant and his private interpretations. If you are not, then don't worry, it wasn't addressed to you.

Regards

[murphE]

I copied another's comment that said..."If the seat of Rome is "vacant"

That person was implying that this was the authors' position, you seemed to be doing the same by quoting it, which meant you didn't read the letter.

Sedevacantists should explain their position. If you are one, please explain

I am not. No one on this thread at that point had taken that position, including the authors of the letter, so what does sedevacanism have to do with this thread?