I think this is in general an admirable and sensible assessment, from the point of view of someone comfortable with the rest of the theology of the old-line Anglican Communion.
I daresay the alphabet soup will only be reduced to the plethora it had attained prior to the NH "consecration". Anyone not allowing women to be ordained is not likely to commune with what is here called the 'faithful Anglican communion in North America'.
And, as that was the proximate cause of the original alphabetization, perhaps orthodoxy now has two meanings.
In Christ,
Deacon Paul+
Regarding the "Anyone not allowing women to be ordained is not likely to commune with what is here called the 'faithful Anglican communion in North America" sentence; would you elaborate? Just curious, and I'm not sure I'm understanding what you are saying?
Thank you.