1 posted on
04/14/2005 7:55:52 AM PDT by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; Peanut Gallery; tellw; nanetteclaret; Saint Reagan; Marauder; stan_sipple; SuzyQue; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
04/14/2005 7:56:22 AM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
To: sionnsar
I think this is in general an admirable and sensible assessment, from the point of view of someone comfortable with the rest of the theology of the old-line Anglican Communion.
I daresay the alphabet soup will only be reduced to the plethora it had attained prior to the NH "consecration". Anyone not allowing women to be ordained is not likely to commune with what is here called the 'faithful Anglican communion in North America'.
And, as that was the proximate cause of the original alphabetization, perhaps orthodoxy now has two meanings.
In Christ,
Deacon Paul+
3 posted on
04/14/2005 10:01:59 AM PDT by
BelegStrongbow
(Having a human friend is no bed of roses-but hobbits? That's very different. :))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson