[A good letter but... "sorted" (paragraph 1)? Did he perhaps mean "sordid"? --sionnsar]
1 posted on
04/04/2005 5:17:13 PM PDT by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; nanetteclaret; Saint Reagan; Marauder; stan_sipple; SuzyQue; LifeofRiley; TheDean; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
04/04/2005 5:17:47 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
To: sionnsar
. . and "Cannon" for "Canon"?
I'm sorry, two howlers like that and I don't believe this writer is actually a lawyer. (Or else it says "dictated but not read" in the memo line at the bottom.)
He doesn't do himself any favors by having such egregious errors in the letter.
He doesn't have the form of address right either.
3 posted on
04/04/2005 5:55:15 PM PDT by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
To: sionnsar
In addition to his misspellings, he started the letter with a breath-taking 69 word run-on sentence. No doubt his heart is in the right place, though....
10 posted on
04/05/2005 7:27:41 AM PDT by
xJones
To: sionnsar
"Did he perhaps mean "sordid"?
My first thought, as well.
15 posted on
04/05/2005 10:35:13 AM PDT by
beelzepug
(Parking For Witches Only--All Others Will Be Toad.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson