Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

We are in accord on this. There was nothing to be gained by Burke's action.

There had been no heresy - no unauthorized ordination, or anything which would ordinarliy indicate schism.

You are right - its all over property, which Burke has now lost.......and with it perhaps a good number of people.


31 posted on 02/24/2005 7:24:53 PM PST by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: thor76
I do think Burke would have eventually prevailed, because Canon Law IS on his side.

But, what's the hurry? Work with these people. Give a little, take some time. Visit them. Say Mass for them. Go to a Polish picnic. Eat some kielbasa. Pick up some children and play with them.

Burke says the money can stay with the parishioners. If that's the case, then all this is really about is Burke forcing a parish that's functioned well for over a hundred years to bend to his will in a matter of months.

Over a piece of property.

33 posted on 02/24/2005 7:34:51 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: thor76
You are right - its all over property,

You're wrong. It's all about discipline.

which Burke has now lost

Hello? Your own statement proves that Burke didn't care about the property. He is more interested in enforcing his authority--which he did. The parish is now left in the wilderness as a result of their actions. They are rich in property, but poor in the Graces that may only be obtained via the Church. Not a good trade for them, if you ask me.
87 posted on 02/25/2005 9:14:23 AM PST by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson