[One fo the Anglican bloggers pointed this out. --sionnsar]
1 posted on
02/21/2005 7:17:21 AM PST by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; ladyinred; Siamese Princess; Brian Allen; kalee; walden; tjwmason; proud_2_B_texasgal; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this list.
This is a moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
02/21/2005 7:17:53 AM PST by
sionnsar
(† trad-anglican.faithweb.com † || Iran Azadi || This part of this tagline is deliberately not blank.)
To: sionnsar
To put it simply: how can they join at the Lords Table with those who do not believe in the Lord, or claim to believe in Him but do not believe what He and His authorized spokesmen say? So, what is the author prescribing? Separate communion lines for liberals and conservatives?
To: sionnsar
Conservative Christians are sometimes confused because all five types of liberal tend to keep the traditional forms (verbal and structural) of the Faith. In using them, while rejecting the content they had previously, liberals are being perfectly reasonable. So, the author has no problem with corruption - defined as the deliberate subversion of the substance of faith by altering (subtly or openly) the content delivered within the form of the faith?
That is not "reasonable" - that is heretical. In any faith.
4 posted on
02/21/2005 7:28:34 AM PST by
MortMan
(Be careful what you wish for... You might get it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson