Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Telling Secrets on the Vatican (re: "Third Secret" of Fatima)
World Net Daily ^ | July 2, 2000 | Jon E. Dougherty

Posted on 02/15/2005 8:36:21 PM PST by Dajjal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
See also the author's July 5, 2000 essay:
What Does "Third Secret" Mean?>br> Official Version of Catholic Church's
Fatima Prophesies Debated

1 posted on 02/15/2005 8:36:21 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dajjal

Thank you for posting this.

"A Catholic priest who says he has seen the original text of the "third secret" of Fatima disputes the official interpretation of the secret released by the Vatican."

As do I.


2 posted on 02/15/2005 8:56:03 PM PST by sageb1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
I'm sure that the first person the Vatican would show the text of the 3rd secret to is a nutty priest who eventually broke with the Church over the Novus Ordo.

Gommar DePauw is simply not credible.

3 posted on 02/15/2005 8:58:23 PM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal; Land of the Irish; thor76; Viva Christo Rey; murphE; Gerard.P

Thanks Dajjal.


4 posted on 02/15/2005 9:11:15 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
Cult!!!

If its not biblical, it isn't christian. Mary was a human not a deity.... and she was not around by 1917...

5 posted on 02/15/2005 9:59:06 PM PST by GeronL (The Old Media is at war with the New Media...... We are all Matt Drudges now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; CouncilofTrent; murphE; Gerard.P

Fr. Gommar DePauw is the founder of the Catholic Traditionalist movement. He was the first to see the error of the ways in which churchment were heading in the 60s.

The late Fr. Malachi Martin was actually given a private reading of the entire text of the third Secret - the exact details of which he took to the grave with him. He did give hints of the general outline/general concepts in his writings. But oney after such were clearly given away by Pope JPII & Cardinal Ratzinger. He was under an oath of secrecy as to the complete and exact contents of the Secret.


6 posted on 02/15/2005 10:05:34 PM PST by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

be gone satan.


7 posted on 02/15/2005 11:15:10 PM PST by DBeers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DBeers
lol.

More like protestant

8 posted on 02/15/2005 11:22:15 PM PST by GeronL (The Old Media is at war with the New Media...... We are all Matt Drudges now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

And your point is...?


9 posted on 02/15/2005 11:37:57 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

"If its not biblical, it isn't christian."

Bzzzzzzt, sorry, wrongola. Thank you for playing.

"Mary was a human not a deity.... and she was not around by 1917..."

So, you don't believe that Jesus came to bring us life everlasting? No soul? We just cease to be at physical death?


10 posted on 02/15/2005 11:39:39 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal

"Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Angelo Sodano announced in Fatima, Portugal, May 13 that the Holy See intended to release the text of the third secret."

Sorry, that just doesn't get it--especially with Blathergate so fresh in memory.

I want to see the original paper in Sr. Lucy's own handwriting, and have it translated by someone of my own choosing.


11 posted on 02/15/2005 11:42:37 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

He apparently saw the Secret at Vatican II, before he broke with the Church over the Novus Ordo. And anyway, just because of that everything he says must be a lie?


12 posted on 02/16/2005 7:05:19 AM PST by VinceJS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VinceJS
Why would somebody in the Vatican show this priest the 3rd Secret?

Don't look at what people say; look at why they say it.

13 posted on 02/16/2005 7:09:49 AM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

It's not that I consider Fr. de Pauw inherently credible or an authority on anything. But, looking at why people say things, the "official" Vatican version must also be held suspect - they would certainly have a motive to hush up the Third Secret if it foretold major spiritual calamities and mass apostasy in the Church.


14 posted on 02/16/2005 7:20:53 AM PST by VinceJS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VinceJS
But, looking at why people say things, the "official" Vatican version must also be held suspect - they would certainly have a motive to hush up the Third Secret if it foretold major spiritual calamities and mass apostasy in the Church.

I think arguing over the 3rd Fatima secret is a colossal waste of time, which is why I am now done with it.

15 posted on 02/16/2005 7:22:46 AM PST by sinkspur ("Preach the gospel. If necessary, use words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Why would somebody in the Vatican show this priest the 3rd Secret?

I'll forgive you for not reading all the WND article. It's a joke of a news source.

However, to answer your question, nobody in the Vatican showed it to him. He was not shown the 3rd Secret. He was shown a supposed copy of it. That is, not the original.

And who showed it to him? Well, here's what the article says:

"While at the (Second Vatican) Council, I was given the text -- the supposed text -- of the third secret of Fatima," Fr. De Pauw said. "Journal reporters -- journalists -- gave it to me" and a few others in attendance.

Bold emphasis mine.

Get the picture?

A group of reporters approached him and said "Hey, wanna see the 3rd Secret?"

Typical WND trash, although not something which would bother the FR "Whack Pack", of course.

16 posted on 02/16/2005 7:49:10 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Cult!!! If its not biblical, it isn't christian. Mary was a human not a deity.... and she was not around by 1917...

So says the ignorant peanut gallery. I suppose Elijah and Moses couldn't have shown up on Mt. Tabor as well. You do not know Jesus Christ. You only know what the Devil will allow you to know. I would ask further for proof as to "if its not biblical, it isn't Christian." one of the silliest statements I've read in a long time. Since I suppose in your mind the bible fell from the sky.

17 posted on 02/16/2005 8:13:27 AM PST by Gerard.P (If you've lost your faith, you don't know you've lost it. ---Fr. Malachi Martin R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Lots of speculation going on here:

Sister Lucia, last remaining witness of Fatima apparitions, dies at 97

SISTER LUCIA RIP

LAST OF CHILDREN WHO CLAIMED TO SEE VIRGIN MARY DIES AT 97

Last child who claimed to see "Virgin Mary" dies

Virgin Mary Child Dies (Lucia of Fatima)

Mourning for Fatima seer (Portugal declares day of mourning)

Third Secret of Fatima is not fully revealed.

Sister Lucia, last remaining witness of Fatima apparitions, dies at 97

Sr. Lucia, Fatima, and Islam

Mystery Fatima: Death of Lucia Accents Famed Secrets & Area's Hidden History

"No More Secrets," Visionary Said in 2001 (Sr. Lucia Confirmed Russia Consecrated to Mary)

Papal praise at Sister Lucia's funeral

Our Lady of Fatima, ‘counterrevolutionary’ and ‘ecumenical’

Questions ... Regarding The Third Secret of Fatima

Telling Secrets on the Vatican (re: "Third Secret" of Fatima)

18 posted on 02/16/2005 8:51:43 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

**Typical WND trash,**

Tend to agree with you. Secular site.


19 posted on 02/16/2005 8:54:51 AM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dajjal
"Missing from the Vatican's explanation, he said, was a portion of the secret that predicted the fall of the modern Catholic Church."

This meaning to the third secret seems to be popping up a lot lately, and I don't think I have noticed it before.

If I hadn't been concerned about the third secret in the past that would be understandable, but I have been an outspoken skeptic of it's release for a long time, and have had to back up my position with a lot of research. I haven't seen that claim associated with the secret before. I'm not saying it wasn't there, just that I never noticed it in all the different opinions I've read.

20 posted on 02/16/2005 9:04:09 AM PST by Arguss (Take the narrow road)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson