Posted on 01/25/2005 5:56:05 AM PST by Catholic54321
Australian Catholic priests are urging Rome to overturn its ban on married clergy as the church grapples with a chronic shortage of ordained priests.
The unprecedented submission to the Vatican directly challenges the obligation of celibacy, a prerequisite of the Catholic priesthood, and has reignited a debate within the church that has been simmering since the Middle Ages.
The National Council of Priests wrote to the Vatican's Synod of Bishops last month arguing that marriage should be no bar to ordination and asking the church to consider readmitting priests who had left the clergy to marry.
It also asked the church to extend the right held by thousands of married clergy who converted to Catholicism from other faiths to practise as priests to other married men.
About half of Australia's 1649 Catholic clergy, including 42 bishops and three cardinals, are members of the National Council of Priests, including the Archbishop of Sydney, Cardinal George Pell
The council's chairman, Father Hal Ranger, said the changes were necessary to ensure Catholics had continued access to the sacraments. Vast distances and cultural or lifestyle factors, combined with decreasing priest numbers, meant the opportunity for some Catholics to celebrate the eucharist was "drastically limited". It was important to take decisive action so that Sunday mass and celebration of the sacraments was reasonably available.
"We request that ... the Synod Fathers examine honestly the appropriateness of insisting upon a priesthood that is, with very few exceptions, obliged to be celibate. Priesthood is a gift, celibacy is a gift: they are not the same gift," said the statement, which was written in response to a discussion paper on the place of the Eucharist in Catholic life.
Father Ranger said Australian priests were loyal to Catholic traditions and adverse to liturgical abuse but "we are scandalised when the gnat of abuse is so carefully strained out while the camel of dying communities is being swallowed".
Last month the Sydney Catholic Diocese announced plans to "twin" more than 50 local parishes to overcome falling priest numbers. It came as a survey of more than 300 Australian priests presented to Catholic bishops showed little support for mandatory celibacy and linked celibacy with thoughts of resignation.
A Melbourne priest and statistician has warned that the Catholic Church in NSW faces a dire shortage of priests in the next 20 years as its clergy ages, retires or dies. Father Eric Hodgens predicted the church would have fewer than one-sixth the number needed to conduct Sunday Mass.
Celibacy was the single biggest obstacle to the priesthood, he said, but while admitting married men would make a difference to recruitment numbers it was not the only answer. "The package at the moment is male, full-time, life-long and celibate and I would think that whole package is difficult for most people to embrace," Father Hodgens said.
Cardinal Pell yesterday declined to say where he stood on the issue of celibacy, only that he agreed with much of what had been written by the council, but not all.
"Reflections on the lineamenta [discussion paper] are offered by the executive of the NCP as 'indications of the thinking of many Australian Catholic priests'.
"As a member of the NCP, I would agree with much of what they have written, but not all of it. There are many rooms in the Father's house," he said.
In fact, God gave us men a wife and the sexual desire followed. The priestly desire to offer sacrifice logically could come only after the Fall.
Welcome to FR.
You're quite right, after all the bible is the book of the Catholic Church, not the other way around.
Go pass out your mimeos on a street corner. You're not going to find any buyers here.
Actually, word around the agora is that penance is a real possibility. As to what kind of infraction would warrant such, I don't know, I haven't been curious enough to ask. Nor have I been naughty enough to find out the hard way. And I don't know what all is entailed. But I do know that those under penance are barred from communion for the duration. So it would have to be a rather weighty matter, comparatively speaking.
Is this a point of dissent with the magisterium for you?
Celibacy is a discipline of the Latin Rite. It is not a dogma, or even a teaching. So, there is no "dissent with the magisterium" involved here.
Well, that's traditio.com's opinion. I've never seen any serious theologian claim that mandatory celibacy is part of divine positive law. If it were, there would be no "mitigations" possible.
In fact, the whole concept of "Biblical Christianity" is preposterous. The Epistles were written to a Church already in existence, or to individual members thereof. They were written to Christians, whose faith could not possibly have been based on writings not yet written. Likewise the four Gospels ... the Gospel according to St. Luke and the Acts, like some of the Epistles, were addressed to an individual. The Apocalypse is comprehensible only in the context of an already existing (and sometimes thriving) Church.
You're right. I was focusing on the three Hail Marys stuff and forgot about this. I may have been naughty enough, I suspect, but I guess the confessors took pity on me. Actually, what happens is that the penitent is told to do something, or refrain from doing something more likely, and during some period of time, he or she might be barred from communion. An instance might be when a couple is living together without being married. The priest refuses them communion, tells them that they msut come to confession and one or the other is sleeping on the couch until the wedding; in the meantime, no communion.
"In the short term, though, the number of diocesan priests will fall, as we have a big bulge of folks who are approaching retirement age (or who have even exceeded it, and have not yet retired)."
This "big bulge" you speak of seems to be a major factor which accentuates the crisis, and makes it appear worse than it really is.
There was a massive flood of men entering the seminary across the developed world following World War II and all our diocesan structures and numbers of parishes were built around these inflated numbers as though they were normal.
To some extent the decline in vocations is little more than a return to the trend prior to the war, although it is exacerbated in particularly corrupt dioceses.
Probably not, but my point in posting the clip is that "serious theologians" (e.g., St. Jerome) have maintained that celibacy is of Apostolic origin.
Others, admittedly, have disputed this. But without a definitive pronouncement from a Council or the Holy See it is impossible to maintain -- as most participants in the debate nowadays do -- that the issue is merely one of discipline.
"Wow. I didn't know that. Lay confessors."
There is precedent in the Roman rite (way, way, way back when!) for deacons hearing confessions and reconciling apostates to the Church.
There is a certain logic to it as the deacon is "the bishop's man" and as such participates in his ministry. When the deacon was given faculties by a bishop to exercise the Sacrament of Penance he was essentially reconciling the penitants to the local Church by acting as a "vicar" of the head of the local Church - i.e. the bishop.
P.S. I have no personal desire ever to be a confessor - coping with wayward deacons is bad enough as it is!!!
Of course it's one of discipline. Immutable teachings cannot be changed, nor can exceptions be made to them. Both of those things have happened to the celibacy discipline.
In addition, as traditio itself points out, the Eastern Rites have "mitigated" the practice, something which is simply not possible with divine positive law.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.