PARTICULARLY according to your standards, your
304 and 309
were quite attacking, assaultive, insulting.
ENOUGH.
Bye.
#309 was *YOUR* post... But yes, it was "attacking, assaultive, insulting". Thanks for admitting that.
As for my post #304, please identify which part(s) you feel were personal attacks. I did not intend any, and upon several rereadings I still don't see any, nor any portions which could be misconstrued as such. I addressed the "Bible code" methodology itself, and just pointed out the problems inherent in the method, and countered your claim that the BCD is giving some mathematicians "consternation" by pointing out that others hold opposing opinions.
Please explain where, specifically, in my post #304 you found material that was personally "attacking, assaultive, insulting", instead of addressing the issues of the BCD method itself.