Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE MATHEMATICAL SIGNATURE OF GOD IN THE WORDS OF SCRIPTURE [INCREDIBLE PROOF]
BOOK THE SIGNATURE OF GOD: Documented Evidence That Proves Beyond Doubt the Bible Is the Inspired... ^ | 1998 | GRANT R JEFFERY

Posted on 11/28/2004 4:42:56 PM PST by Quix

NOTE: If I know anything about the rabid naysayers on FR, at least some of the RELIGIOUS [vs spiritual] types will wail and rant that ANYTHING having to do with numbers and The Bible has to be crossing the line into dealing with Biblically forbidden NUMEROLOGY. This is nonsense. The dictionary definition of “numerology” makes clear that numerology is the study of numbers, as the figures designating the year of one’s birth, “to determine their supposed influence on one’s life, future, etc.” [Quix color, bold emphasis on the definition from:

HERE: http://www.infoplease.com/ipd/A0562554.html

Clearly, the Biblically prohibited issue is INTEREST IN, TRUST IN, FASCINATION IN, FAITH IN A SUPERNATURAL OCCULTIC CONNECTION, PHENOMENA OR DYNAMIC rather than Faith in God.

Please note also, I didn’t go back and insert the italics codes for the rather many italicized words. Sorry. Have other priorities today, too. As usual, the color bolded is my emphasis.

CHAPTER 12 excerpt for fair use discussion from

The Signature of God

By Grant R Jeffery

The Book has many chapters of impressive study and research including photos from Sinai Peninsula re Moses’ led crossing at the EXODUS etc. I encourage people to buy and read the whole book. It’s well worth the time. NOTE: Jeffrey uses Hebrew Letters in the text. I’ve forgotten my Hebrew alphabet and certainly don’t know how to post them. If someone can clue me in (listing the Hebrew alphabet with the letter’s names in English letters—as well as how to post the Hebrew), I’ll see what I can do, later.

The Mathematical Signature of God in the Words of Scripture

The Scriptures reveal God as the great mathematician who knows the smallest detail of His creation, and measures and numbers all things. This character of God is consistent with the revealed phenomenon of staggering complexity involving mathematical patterns within the text of the Scriptures. The Bible declares that God is so concerned with the details of His children's lives that He has numbered the hairs on our head. "But the very hairs of your head are all numbered" (Matthew 10:30). The prophet Isaiah speaks of His majesty and His concern for numbering and measuring all things [paragraphing added by Quix]:

"Who has measured the waters in the hollow of His hand, measured heaven with a span and calculated the dust of the earth in a measure? Weighed the mountains in scales and the hills in a balance?" (Isaiah 40:12, NKjv). When you consider the Bible's declaration that God "measured the waters," "measured heaven with a span," and "calculated the dust of the earth in a measure," it does not seem unusual or out of character that this same Almighty God would inspire His writers to record His precise message to mankind in the Scriptures with a mathematical precision within the original text that surpasses our ability to understand fully.

Evidence of Divine Authorship of the Old Testament

Ivan Panin was one of the most remarkable Christians to live in this century. Almost one hundred years ago, this fascinating and famous mathematician left Russia to settle eventually in Canada in the town of Aldershot, Ontario, not far from where I live. Although he was a committed atheist in his early years, he discovered the reality of Jesus Christ later. In 1890, Panin embarked on an exciting journey of scientific exploration of the text of the Bible that would prove that the Bible is truly the inspired Word of God. This century has witnessed a progressive abandonment of the doctrine of verbal inspiration of the Scriptures by many biblical scholars and religious leaders. As the leaders of many mainline churches succumbed to the continuous assaults on fundamental doctrines and the authority of Scripture, many Christian laymen began to lose their confidence that they could absolutely trust that the Bible was truly the inspired Word of God. As Ivan Panin wrote, "In the early centuries Christianity suffered most from its avowed enemies; in the last, from its professed friends."

Panin completed an astonishing study during the ^•'course of fifty years that revealed the most amazing mathematical pattern beneath the surface layer of the text of the Bible. He worked diligently up to eighteen hours a day for half a century to illustrate the divine inspiration and authority of Scripture. As one small example, Panin discovered that the first verse of the Book of Genesis contains an astonishing number of mathematical patterns that illustrate divine inspiration. “ In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth (Genesis 1:1).

The phenomenon of these mathematical patterns cannot be understood until we realize that the Bible was composed in alpha-numeric languages—Hebrew and Greek. These ancient languages did not possess Arabic numbers to express numeric data. Therefore, these languages used various letters of their alphabet to express numbers such as " 1,2,3," etc. In addition, a small portion of the Bible was written in Aramaic, which is also alpha-numeric. Each letter in these languages stood for a number. -In other words, each of the letters expressed both a letter and a number. When they wished to express a number, such as 22, they would choose two Hebrew letters—one letter [HEBREW LTR] stood for 20 and the second letter [HEBREW LTR] stood for 2.

The first letter of the Hebrew alphabet stood for 1, the second for 2, the third for 3, etc. When we come to the eleventh letter, it represented 20, the twelfth stood for 30, etc., all the way through to 800. Because each letter had a numeric value, every word can be given a numeric value by adding up the total value of each of the individual letters. In addition, every one of the Hebrew and Greek letters was given a place value as well. To help illustrate this phenomenon let's apply this system to the English language. It would look like this:

An Example Illustrated in the English Language

PLACE VALUE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60

NUMERIC VALUE

The Hebrew Language

PLACE VALUE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

[FIRST 15 HEBREW LETTERS]

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60

NUMERIC VALUE

Note that in the above example using the English alphabet the first ten letters have the same place values and numeric values. However, when we get to the eleventh letter K, the numeric value begins to increase by ten with each additional letter until we reach the value of 100. From that point in the alphabet forward the numeric value of each letter will increase by 100.

Every single word in Hebrew contains a series of letters with individual numeric values. For example, the word B'raisheet, "beginning," is expressed in Genesis 1:1 in Hebrew as [HEBREW LETTERS]. If you add up the total value of the individual letters in B'raisheet the numeric value of the word is 913. Since each word has a numeric value, we can add up the value of each of the words in a biblical verse to determine the numerical value of the sentence.

The Astonishing Pattern of SEVENS in Genesis 1:1

Let us begin by examining the first verse of the Bible to explore Panin's discovery.

"In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth" (Genesis 1:1)

[Genesis 1:1 in Hebrew]

Ivan Panin carefully examined the Hebrew text of Genesis 1:1 and discovered an incredible phenomenon of multiples of 7 that could not be explained by chance. Genesis 1:1 was composed of 7 Hebrew words containing a 28 letters. Throughout the Bible, the number 7 appears repeatedly as a symbol of divine perfection—the 7 days of creation. God rested on the 7th day, the 7 churches, the 7 seals, the 7 trumpets, etc. In total, Panin discovered 30 separate codes involving the number 7 in this first verse of the Bible.

A Listing of the Phenomenal Features of Sevens Found in Genesis 1:

1. The number of Hebrew words.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
2. The number of letters equals 28 (28-4= 7) . . . . . Seven
3. The first three Hebrew words translated
“In the beginning God created” contain
14 letters (14 / 2 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Seven
4. The last four Hebrew words "the heavens
and the earth" have 14 letters (14-2=7) . . . . . . . .Seven
5. The fourth and fifth words have 7 letters . . . . . Seven
6. The sixth and seventh words have 7 letters . . . . .Seven
7. The three key words: God, heaven, and earth have 14 letters (14 / 2 = 7). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Seven
8. The number of letters in the four remaining s
words is also 14 (14 / 2 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
9. The middle word is the shortest with 2 letters.
However, in combination with the word to the
Right or left it totals 7 letters . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Seven
10. The numeric value of the first, middle,
(and last letters is 133 (133 / 19 = 7) . . . . . . . .. . . Seven
11. The numeric value of the first and last letters
of all seven words is 1,393 (1,393 - 199 = 7) Seven
When professors on the mathematics faculty at Harvard University were presented with this biblical phenomenon, they naturally attempted to disprove its significance as a proof of divine authorship. However, after valiant efforts these professors were unable to duplicate this incredible mathematical phenomenon. [QX PARAGRAPHING ADDED HERE]

The Harvard scientists used the English language and artificially assigned numeric values to the English alphabet. They had a potential vocabulary of over 400,000 available English words to choose from to construct a sentence about any topic they chose. [QX paragraphing added here]

Compare this to the limitations of word choices in the biblical Hebrew language, which has only forty-five hundred available word choices that the writers of the Old Testament could use. Despite their advanced mathematical abilities and access to computers the mathematicians were unable to come close to incorporating 30 mathematical multiples of 7 as found in the Hebrew words of Genesis 1:1.

If anyone doubts the difficulty of producing a passage following such an intricate pattern of sevens, I challenge you to try it yourself. I have tried, and it is impossible to complete a paragraph on any topic and remain true to the system of interlocking sevens. I doubt that anyone could complete a paragraph of over one hundred and fifty words following such a pattern of sevens, as found in Genesis 1:1 and Matthew, chapter 1, even if they were to devote several years to the effort. [QX added paragraphing, here].

The problem is that with the addition of every I fit single word and sentence the magnitude of the challenge to integrate the new phrase into the existing pattern grows geometrically. Each word and sentence must fit into the pattern existing within me preceding sentences. [Qx added paragraphing here].

In light of this virtual impossibility we need to remember that the writers of the Bible were forty-four mostly common men who wrote their individual texts separated from one another over a period of sixteen centuries. How could these ordinary men contribute to this hidden pattern without consultation when most of them never met their fellow authors? The only logical explanation is that God directed their minds through supernatural INSPIRATION TO WRITE His precise inspired words.

The number "seven" permeates the totality of Scripture because the number speaks of God's divine perfection and perfect order. The actual number 7 appears 287 times in the Old Testament (287 - 41 = 7) while the word seventh occurs 98 times (98 - 14 = 7). The word seven-fold appearst seven times. In addition, the word seventy is used 56 times • (56 / 8 = 7).

Panin discovered literally thousands of such mathematical patterns underlying all of the books of the Old Testament before his death in 1942. I refer the interested reader to Panin's book. The Inspiration of the Scriptures Scientifically Demonstrated,

which discusses these phenomena extensively. Panin and others have examined other Hebrew literature and have attempted to find such mathematical patterns, but they are not found anywhere outside the Bible.

Matthew 1:1-17—Evidence of Divine Authorship of the New Testament

Panin also examined the New Testament to discover whether or not the pattern continued. There were four hundred years of silence between the completion of the Old Testament ft around 396 B.C., and the writing of the New Testament following the resurrection of Jesus Christ. However, when God inspired the New Testament authors, including Matthew, to begin writing the Gospels, He again manifested His signature on the pages of Scripture by creating a marvelously complex pattern of sevens beneath the text of Matthew's Gospel.

The first section in Matthew's account consists of seventeen verses from Matthew 1:1 to 1:17 that describe in•detail one particular subject, the genealogy of Jesus Christ. This seventeen-verse text contains 72 Greek Vocabulary words. A Vocabulary word is a particular word different from any other word that was used in a passage. In other words, a Greek word that appears 6 times in the passage would only be counted as 1 Vocabulary word. Obviously, the number of Vocabulary words will differ from the number of total words appearing in the passage. The same system of numeric and place values for letters exists in the Greek language used in the New Testament as we found in Hebrew of the Old Testament.

A Listing of the Phenomenal Features of Sevens Found in Matthew 1:1-17

1 The total numeric value of the 72 Vocabulary
words is 43,364 (42,364 - 6,052 = 7) . . . . . . . Seven
2 The number of Greek nouns in the passage
IS 56 (56 / 8 = 7)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
3 The Greek article for “the” occurs 56 times
(56 / 8 = 7)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven

In the first eleven verses of Matthew 1:1-11 we find these additional features:

4 The number of Greek vocabulary words is 49
(49 / 7 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
5 Of these 49 words, 28 words begin with a vowel
(28 / 4 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Seven
6 Of these 49 words, 21 begin with a consonant
(21 / 3 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
7 The number of letters in these 49 words equals
266 (266 / 38 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
8 Of these 49 words, 35 words occur more than
one time (35 / 5 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
9 Of these 49 words, 14 words occur only one time
(14 / 2 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
10 The number of proper nouns is 35 (35/5=7) . . . . Seven
11 The number of times these proper nouns occur
is 63 (63 / 9 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
12 Of the 35 proper nouns, the number of
male names is 28 (28 / 4 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
13. Three women, Tamar, Rahab, and Ruth, are named
in this section. The number of Greek letters in
these three names is 7 (14 / 2 = 7) . . . . . . . . . Seven
Only a few of the numerical features that are found in this passage are listed in this analysis by Ivan Panin.

However, these features reveal an underlying profound mathematical design that reveals the signature of the true author of both the New Testament and the Old Testament— God Himself. However, to illustrate that this is not an unusual phenomenon occurring only in this one isolated passage, I will list some additional mathematical features that occur in the balance of Matthew 1:18-25 and describe the birth of Jesus Christ. In this seven-verse section God has placed an astonishing pattern of SEVENS that verify the signature of the original author.

The Pattern of SEVENS in Matthew 1:18-25—The History of Christ's Birth

1. The number of letters in the seven word
passage is 161 (161 -23=7) . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
2. The number of Vocabulary words is 77
. . . . (77-11=7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
3. Six Greek words occur only in this passage
. . . . . and never again in Matthew. These six
. . . . . .Greek words contain precisely 56 letters
. . . . . (56 - 8 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
4. The number of distinct proper nouns in
. . . . . the passage is 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
5. The number of Greek letters in these seven
. . . . . .proper nouns is 42 (42 - 6 = 7) . . . . . . . . Seven
6. The number of words spoken by the angel to
. . . . . . Joseph is 28 (28 - 4 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . Seven
7. The number of Greek forms of words used in
. . . . . . this passage is 161 (161 - 23 = 7) . . . . . . . Seven
8. The number of Greek forms of words in the
. . . . . angel’s speech is 35 (35 / 5 = 7) . . . . . . . . . Seven
9. The number of letters in the angel's 35 forms
. . . . . of words is 168 (168 / 24 = 7) . . . . . . . . . . . Seven

This phenomenal discovery by Panin has been examined by numerous authorities and the figures have been verified. In total, Panin accumulated over forty thousand pages of detailed calculations covering most of the text of the Bible before his death. [Qx added paragraphing here]

These incredible, mathematical patterns are not limited to the number seven. There are numerous other patterns. These amazing patterns appear in the vocabulary, grammatical forms, parts of speech, and particular forms of words. They occur throughout the whole text of the Bible containing 31,173 verses. When you consider the amazing details of this mathematical phenomenon you realize that the change of a single letter or word in the original languages of Hebrew or Greek would destroy the pattern. Now we can understand why Jesus Christ declared that the smallest letter and grammatical mark of the Scriptures were preserved by God's hand: "For verily I say unto you. Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled” Matthew 5:18)

Naturally, the religious skeptics did not abandon their atheism in response to these incredible discoveries by Ivan Panin that revealed a staggering pattern of complexity hidden beneath the text of Scripture. After many skeptics had dismissed his research, Ivan Panin issued a public challenge through one of the major newspapers of the day, the New York Sun, in a letter to the editor on November 20, 1899, offering his detractors an opportunity to prove his research wrong if they could. [Qx added paragraphing here].

Panin issued his public challenge to some of the greatest atheist scholars of the day. "I herewith respectfully invite any or all of the following to prove that my facts are not facts: namely Messrs. Lyman Abbott, Washington Gladden, Herber Newton, Minot J. Savage, Presidents Eliot of Harvard, White of Cornell, and Harper of the University of Chicago, Professor J. Henry Thayer of Harvard, and Dr. Briggs, and any other prominent higher critic so called. They may associate with themselves, if they choose, all the contributors to the ninth edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, who wrote its articles on Biblical subjects, together with a dozen mathematicians of the caliber of Professor Simon Newcomb. [Qx added paragraphing here]

The heavier the calibre of either scholar or mathematician, the more satisfactory to ft me. They will find that my facts are facts. And since they are facts, I am ready to take them to any three prominent lawyers, or, better still, to any judge of the superior or supreme court, and abide by his decision as to whether the conclusion is not necessary that Inspiration alone can account for the facts, if they are facts. All I should ask would be that the judge treat the case as he would any other case that comes before him."

Despite his public challenge in the New York Sun, not one of these prominent men attempted to refute Mr. Panin's undeniable facts or to deal with the unavoidable conclusion that the evidence produced by Panin proved that the Bible was truly inspired by a divine intelligence. The critics could not refute these facts. The only thing they could do was to ignore them. [Qx added paragraphing here]

Were Mr. Panin's research and calculations wrong? If so, where? If they were correct, and if they are, then the evidence exists for all to see that God did truly inspire the words of Scripture. One of Panin's last challenges consisted of this argument. He wrote to his ''detractors: "Lastly, my argument can also be refuted by showing that even though my facts be true, my arithmetic faultless, and my collocation of numerics honest, that men could have written thus without inspiration from above."

However, any honest attempt to create a paragraph on any subject that will contain this astonishing pattern of mathematical features within the surface text will utterly fail. I doubt that even a modern Cray super-computer could produce a passage containing the "wheels within wheels" pattern of sevens as revealed in Genesis 1:1 or Matthew 1:1-25.

To date, no one has succeeded in duplicating the phenomenon produced by the biblical writers in ancient times.

What was Panin’s own view of the Scriptures after a lifetime of diligent study? He wrote the following statement in one of his essays after warning of the limitations of wisdom found in secular philosophy. "Not so, however, with The Book. For it tells of One who spake as men never spake, who was the true bread of life, that which cometh down from the heavens, of which if a man eat he shall never hunger." Ivan Panin's conclusion of the matter was the following challlenge.

"My friend of the world, whoso you are: Either Jesus Christ is mistaken or you are. The answer that neither might be is only evading the issue, not settling it. But the ages have decided that Jesus Christ was not mistaken. It is for you to decide whether you shall continue to be."

QX: AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN! AMEN!

PTL!


TOPICS: Apologetics; Charismatic Christian; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; History; Judaism; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science; Skeptics/Seekers; Theology
KEYWORDS: andothercryptic; astonomicaldata; atheist; biblcodedigestdotcom; bible; biblecode; biblecodedigest; biblestudy; breakingcodes; christ; christian; ciphermachine; ciphers; clandestine; clandestinecomm; code; coded; codedevelopment; codes; codesciphers; colossus; communication; cryptanalysis; cryptic; cryptograph; cryptology; cypher; deciphering; encoding; enigma; fredbwrixon; grantjeffery; hieroglyphics; hieroglyphs; internet; ivanpanin; jesus; lord; makingcodes; mathematics; message; messages; net; philaeobelisk; research; scripture; secret; secretmessage; secretmessages; secrets; study; web; wigwag; worldwideweb; wrixon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361-369 next last
To: xzins
Thank you for your reply!

You are saying that as a separate study (within the parameters of valid statistical research) that ELS can be engaging and should be pursued.

Indeed, I believe it ought to be pursued for what it is - not for what some wish it to be, e.g. the ability to predict the future whether geopolitics, economy, or whatever.

You appear to be suggesting with the commercialization that ELS has gone after the sensational and left any rigid standards to which statistical research might have subjected it.

Indeed. The ELS should be left with the mathematicians and those who wish to commercialize it should withdraw and lay no claim to the serious mathematicians' work to support their own desires.

The commercialization has brought all kinds of ridicule on the serious mathematicians and thus diminished the value of their effort to many.

101 posted on 11/29/2004 8:30:58 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Quix

About 25 years ago there was a book published called "Theomatics" about this same thing. Was quite interesting.


102 posted on 11/29/2004 8:31:37 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; P-Marlowe

I tend to agree with your common sense approach to this, AG. Thank you.

I'm also, though, connecting it in my mind to your ideas on creation, universe, physical law, and geometry.

The mathematical order of creation would seem to indicate that God might incorporate that mathematical orderliness elsewhere....such as in His Word.

P-Marlowe showed me an idea from bible teacher Chuck Missler who had found a message/hint about the Messiah in the names of the line of Adam in the book of Genesis. I don't recall where to find it again, but it reinforced my sense that there is so much about the bible that we do not know.


103 posted on 11/29/2004 8:39:07 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Starwind; xzins; Quix; Seven_0
Thank you so much for the ping to your post and analysis!

IMO, the real signature of God is actually found in His prophecies.

Indeed, prophesy and its fulfillment as recorded in Scripture and history is the most important signature. As an example, Jesus' mentioned many of the prophesies and that they must be fulfilled. Psalms 22 is especially profound to me.

But there are other fulfilled prophesies as well such as Daniel's concerning Alexander the Great, etc. - and modern day fulfillments, such as the return of the Jews to Israel with language and tradition - after being spread among the nations for nearly 2,000 years.

But there is also God's trademark in the heavens and the firmament (Psalms 19). Science itself runs headlong into such declarations of His glory - e.g. that there was a beginning, the existence of information in the universe and biological life and more.

And there are also signatures in the Scripture. The most obvious is the single Authorship despite it being compiled over centuries by scribes of different backgrounds.

The natural man can see the continuity throughout but more importantly, the Scriptures themselves bring the living Word of God alive within the reader who is born again. The Scriptures are not like any other manuscript.

There is also a mathematical consistency in the Scriptures and nature which suggests that an authorship trademark may exist either in the meaning (like Seven_0's posts) or in the actual language as dictated by the Spirit (e.g. the ELS in Genesis) - or both.

That there is a mathematical structure should not surprise us, since God created the natural world and also authored the Scriptures.

The mathematical structure of "all that there is" is so breath-taking that the physicists refer to it as "the unreasonable effectiveness of math". For instance, it doesn't surprise us that calculus can solve physics problems - but it is positively breath-taking that Einstein was able to pull Riemmanian geometry off-the-shelf to describe general relativity. Personally, I also see this is a signature of God the Creator.

104 posted on 11/29/2004 9:01:04 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

LOL. Yeah it should have returned the symbol for 54.

It seems to work now, for 54 anyway, I didn't try others.

Perhaps the mind reader is not so incredible, or maybe you just didn't have enough faith in it :)


105 posted on 11/29/2004 9:06:14 AM PST by Starwind (The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe
The mathematical order of creation would seem to indicate that God might incorporate that mathematical orderliness elsewhere....such as in His Word.

LOLOL! We must be on the same wave-length my dear brother in the Lord. I had posted pretty much the same point at 104 before I read your reply to me at 103!

I look forward to reading more about P-Marlowe's post!

106 posted on 11/29/2004 9:15:55 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Quix
BTW, I doubt you've read Roland Buck's book at all.

Don't care to.

"But there are many other ways in which deceiving spirits have infiltrated the Church. The dramatic increase in the number of books advocating angel contact was begun many years ago with the late Rev. Roland Buck’s Angels on Assignment. Characteristically, however, this text had little to do with the holy angels. The content of Rev. Buck’s book and an examination of the history behind it, including the fact of changing the "angels’" original statements to make them consistent with biblical teaching, indicate that Rev. Buck was not a participant in godly angelic revelation, but a spiritistic deception. Regardless of Rev. Buck’s and publishers Charles and Frances Hunter’s evident sincerity in publishing the book, the "angels" teachings’ have, as always, revealed their true nature." (Are Popular Angels Active in Cults? What Are Some False Christian Approaches to Angels?)

107 posted on 11/29/2004 9:26:04 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; xzins
From Personal Update
A Hidden Message:
The Gospel in Genesis
by Chuck Missler

We frequently use the familiar term, gospel, or good news. Where is the first place it appears in the Bible? The answer may surprise you.

An Integrated Message

The great discovery is that the Bible is a message system: it's not simply 66 books penned by 40 authors over thousands of years, the Bible is an integrated whole which bears evidence of supernatural engineering in every detail.

The Jewish rabbis have a quaint way of expressing this very idea: they say that they will not understand the Scriptures until the Messiah comes. But when He comes, He will not only interpret each of the passages for us, He will interpret the very words; He will even interpret the very letters themselves; in fact, He will even interpret the spaces between the letters!

When I first heard this, I simply dismissed this as a colorful exaggeration. Until I reread Matthew 5:17 and 18:

"Think not that I have come to destroy the Torah and the prophets; I have not come to destroy but to fulfill.
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled."

(A jot and tittle are the Hebrew equivalent of our dotting an i and the crossing of a t.)

An Example

A remarkable example of this can be glimpsed in Genesis Chapter 5, where we have the genealogy of Adam through Noah. This is one of those chapters which we often tend to skim over quickly as we pass through Genesis it's simply a genealogy from Adam to Noah.

But God always rewards the diligent student. Let's examine this chapter more closely.

In our Bible, we read the Hebrew names. What do these names mean in English?

A Study of Original Roots

The meaning of proper names can be a difficult pursuit since a direct translation is often not readily available. Even a conventional Hebrew lexicon can prove disappointing. A study of the original roots, however, can yield some fascinating insights.

(A caveat: many study aids, such as a conventional lexicon, can prove rather superficial when dealing with proper nouns. Furthermore, views concerning the meanings of original roots are not free of controversy and variant readings.)

Let's take an example.

The Flood Judgment

Methuselah comes from muth, a root that means "death";1 and from shalach, which means to bring, or to send forth. The name Methuselah means, "his death shall bring".2

Methuselah's father was given a prophecy of the coming Great Flood, and was apparently told that as long as his son was alive, the judgment of the flood would be withheld; but as soon as he died, the flood would be brought or sent forth.

(Can you imagine raising a kid like that? Every time the boy caught a cold, the entire neighborhood must have panicked!)

And, indeed, the year that Methuselah died, the flood came.3

It is interesting that Methuselah's life, in effect, was a symbol of God's mercy in forestalling the coming judgment of the flood.

Therefore, it is fitting that his lifetime is the oldest in the Bible, speaking of the extensiveness of God's mercy.

The Other Names

If there is such significance in Methuselah's name, let's examine the other names to see what may lie behind them.

Adam's name means man. As the first man, that seems straight forward enough.

Seth

Adam's son was named Seth, which means appointed. Eve said, "For God hath appointed me another seed instead of Abel, whom Cain slew."4

Enosh

Seth's son was called Enosh, which means mortal, frail, or miserable. It is from the root anash, to be incurable, used of a wound, grief, woe, sickness, or wickedness.

It was in the days of Enosh that men began to defile the name of the Living God.5

Kenan

Enosh's son was named Kenan, which can mean sorrow, dirge, or elegy. (The precise denotation is somewhat elusive; some study aids unfortunately presume that Kenan is synonymous with Cainan.)

Balaam, looking down from the heights of Moab, uses a pun upon the name of the Kenites when he prophesies their destruction.6

We have no real idea as to why these names were chosen for their children. Often they may have referred to circumstances at birth, and so on.

Mahalalel

Kenan's son was Mahalalel, from Mahalal which means blessed or praise; and El, the name for God. Thus, Mahalalel means the Blessed God. Often Hebrew names include El, the name of God, as Dan-i-el, "God is my Judge", etc.

Jared

Mahalalel's son was named Jared, from the verb yaradh, meaning shall come down.7

Enoch

Jared's son was named Enoch, which means teaching, or commencement. He was the first of four generations of preachers. In fact, the earliest recorded prophecy was by Enoch, which amazingly enough deals with the Second Coming of Christ (although it is quoted in the Book of Jude in the New Testament):

Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, "Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,

To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against."
Jude 14, 15

Methuselah

Enoch was the father of Methuselah, who we have already mentioned. Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah.8 Apparently, Enoch received the prophecy of the Great Flood, and was told that as long as his son was alive, the judgment of the flood would be withheld. The year that Methuselah died, the flood came.

Enoch, of course, never died: he was translated 9 (or, if you'll excuse the expression, raptured ). That's how Methuselah can be the oldest man in the Bible, yet he died before his father!

Lamech

Methuselah's son was named Lamech, a root still evident today in our own English word, lament or lamentation. Lamech suggests despairing.

(This name is also linked to the Lamech in Cain's line who inadvertently killed his son Tubal-Cain in a hunting incident.10)

Noah

Lamech, of course, is the father of Noah, which is derived from nacham, to bring relief or comfort, as Lamech himself explains in Genesis 5:29.

The Composite List

Now let's put it all together:

Hebrew English
Adam Man
Seth Appointed
Enosh Mortal
Kenan Sorrow;
Mahalalel The Blessed God
Jared Shall come down
Enoch Teaching
Methuselah His death shall bring
Lamech The Despairing
Noah Rest, or comfort.

That's rather remarkable:

Man (is) appointed mortal sorrow; (but) the Blessed God shall come down teaching (that) His death shall bring (the) despairing rest.

Here's the Gospel hidden within a genealogy in Genesis!

(You will never convince me that a group of Jewish rabbis conspired to hide the Christian Gospel right here in a genealogy within their venerated Torah!)

Evidence of Design

The implications of this discovery are more wide spread than is evident at first glance.

It demonstrates that in the earliest chapters of the Book of Genesis, God had already laid out His plan of redemption for the predicament of mankind. It is a love story, written in blood on a wooden cross which was erected in Judea almost 2,000 years ago.

The Bible is an integrated message system, the product of supernatural engineering. Every number, every place name, every detail every jot and tittle is there for our learning, our discovery, and our amazement. Truly, our God is an awesome God.

It is astonishing to discover how many Biblical controversies seem to evaporate if one simply recognized the unity the integrity of these 66 books, penned by 40 authors over thousands of years.

It is remarkable how many subtle discoveries lie behind the little details of the text. Some of these become immediately obvious with a little study; some are more technical and require special helps.

Many of these discoveries are described in our Audio Book, Beyond Coincidence. Several are also highlighted in our Audio Book, The Creator Beyond Time and Space.

Look behind every detail: there's a discovery to be made! God always rewards the diligent student. What other messages lay hidden behind the names in the Bible? Check it out.


Notes:
  1. Muth, death, occurs 125 times in the Old Testament.
  2. See Pink, Jones, and Stedman in the bibliography.
  3. Methuselah was 187 when he had Lamech, and lived 782 years more. Lamech had Noah when he was 182 (Genesis 5:25-28). The Flood came in Noah's 600th year (Genesis 7:6, 11). 600 + 182 = 782nd year of Lamech, the year Methuselah died.
  4. Genesis 4:25.
  5. Genesis 4:26 is often mistranslated. Targum of Onkelos: ...desisted from praying in the name ; Targum of Jonathan: surnamed their idols in the name... ; Kimchi, Rashi, and other ancient Jewish commentators agree. Jerome indicated that this was the opinion of many Jews of his day. Maimonides, Commentary on the Mishna (a constituent part of the Talmud), a.d. 1168, ascribes the origin of idolatry to the days of Enosh.
  6. Numbers 24:21, 23.
  7. Some authorities suggest that this might be an allusion to the Sons of God who came down to corrupt the daughters of men, resulting in the Nephilim (Fallen Ones) of Genesis 6. These were discussed in our article last month (January 1996), and are also reviewed in our audio book, The Flood of Noah.
  8. Genesis 5:21, 24.
  9. Genesis 5:24.
  10. Genesis 4:19-25; rabbinical sources, re: Kaplan, et al.
Bibliography:
  1. Eastman, Mark, and Missler, Chuck, The Creator Beyond Time and Space, The Word for Today, Costa Mesa CA, 1995.
  2. Jones, Alfred, Dictionary of Old Testament Proper Names, Kregel Publications, Grand Rapids MI, 1990.
  3. Kaplan, Rabbi Aryeh, The Living Torah, Maznaim Publishing Corporation, Jerusalem, 1981.
  4. Pink, Arthur W., Gleanings in Genesis, Moody Bible Institute, Chicago IL, 1922.
  5. Missler, Chuck, Beyond Coincidence (audio book with notes), Koinonia House, Coeur d Alene ID, 83816, 1994.
  6. Rosenbaum, M., and Silbermann, A., Pentateuch with Onkelos's Translation (into Aramaic) and Rashi s Commentary, Silbermann Family Publishers, Jerusalem, 1973.
  7. Stedman, Ray C., The Beginnings, Word Books, Waco TX, 1978.

108 posted on 11/29/2004 9:30:22 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Starwind
i THINK Most of the so called Codes spread about are artifacts of man. NOT ALL of them. As I'd think you'd know.

They are all human inventions.

109 posted on 11/29/2004 9:31:38 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Quix; Alamo-Girl
However, if Christianity survived this great a time without it, then we can afford to wait.

Obvuously it has survived, and such "codes" serve no useless purpose.

If is a way for the small-minded to be distracted from the plain truth of the words (not magically patterns) of Scripture.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn their ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables." (1 Tim. 4:3,4)

The "Bible code" folks are just their to scratch itching ears, nothing else.

110 posted on 11/29/2004 9:36:36 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
How beautiful! Thank you!!!

If you don't mind ... would you also post it to the Standing in Awe thread where we are collecting such things?

111 posted on 11/29/2004 9:42:13 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Quix

There is no question that numerology plays a large part in religion. Christians may be late to the game, but Jewish and Islamic scholars have been at the game for a while. Some passages in the OT are obvious numerical constructions and references to numbers are frequent. It is another level of communication. Proof of something? Nah.


112 posted on 11/29/2004 9:43:59 AM PST by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topcat54
Thank you for sharing your views!
113 posted on 11/29/2004 9:44:00 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; xzins; Quix
Thank you for sharing your views!

You're welcome.

Do you know whether anyone has ever been able to discover some "truth" about God, Jesus, man, salvation, whatever, from the so-called "Bible codes" that could not be discovered by simply studying the Bible?

If not, what good are they?

114 posted on 11/29/2004 9:47:21 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: topcat54

I appreciate your question, TC, but I simply don't know enough about the bible codes to answer your question.

I don't mind it if they're there, and I don't mind it if they're not there.

But one thing I'm not is knowledgeable on the subject.


115 posted on 11/29/2004 9:50:13 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; xzins
If you don't mind ... would you also post it to the Standing in Awe thread where we are collecting such things?

Help yourself.

Here is a whole slew of articles that would fit in your "Standing in Awe thread.

Prepare to be flamed if you post any of them. :-)

116 posted on 11/29/2004 9:50:52 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; xzins; Quix
The mathematical structure of "all that there is" is so breath-taking that the physicists refer to it as "the unreasonable effectiveness of math". For instance, it doesn't surprise us that calculus can solve physics problems - but it is positively breath-taking that Einstein was able to pull Riemmanian geometry off-the-shelf to describe general relativity. Personally, I also see this is a signature of God the Creator.

Unquestionably the signature of God is found in His creation, which creation encompasses the physics & math 'orderliness' He imbued in creation.

But God's signature is in the Creation, not in the books written by physicists and mathematicians that describe Creation.

Salvador Dali's surreal artistic style (his 'signature') is in his paintings. Not in the descriptions about his life and paintings.

Yes, our pursuit of math, physics, science, organizations and orders, etc all may reveal some truth about God's creation, and hence His 'signature'. But that signature is in what God created, not our textbooks or periodic charts, etc that help us see His order (signature). God's signature is in the order, that such order and design even exists, but not in the equations that describe that order.

The difference in the bible (and biblical prophecy) is that it is God's own thoughts or revelations specifically and directly given to us - in advance - which could contain His signature.

And while God might have 'written between the lines' of the bible (so to speak) and might have established some hidden order, my problem with that premise is two fold: 1) minimally we presume such hidden order to be of God and thus give it more weight than perhaps it ought, but moreso 2) man has decided what was hidden and hence presumed what is the signature.

An illustration perhaps at this point:

The ELS theory as an abstract concept is benign. But to apply it, one (a human) must decide what to 'look for' using the ELS algorithms. Someone decides "Hey, let's look for "Assassin" or let's look for "Begin" (Menachem)". Man has contaminated the methodology by choosing what to seek, and choosing after the fact - after Begin was assassinated. We don't know what to look for (using ELS) in advance, do we.

Now if there were in the Canon a 'Book of Mysteries' and God said therein "Find ye therefor my warning of murdereth of Menachem Begin, for warnings have I given thee, which warning have I shrouded within my word" - then I'd say there was something authentic of God to start with. But when man must choose what to start with, and that even after it has happened, is IMO a fatally flawed method.

Whereas ELS requires man to decide what to decode, prophecy is God directly and plainly telling man what to watch for.

117 posted on 11/29/2004 9:58:00 AM PST by Starwind (The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: topcat54; Starwind; xzins; Quix; P-Marlowe
Thank you for your reply!

Do you know whether anyone has ever been able to discover some "truth" about God, Jesus, man, salvation, whatever, from the so-called "Bible codes" that could not be discovered by simply studying the Bible?

If not, what good are they?

Looking for and declaring God's signature both in nature and in the Scriptures is all about praising Him - not becoming enlightened or being able to predict the future, etc.

The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. - Psalms 19:1

For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, [even] his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: - Romans 1:20

Equidistant Letter Sequencing in Genesis points in the same direction as geometric physics, i.e. the unreasonable effectiveness of math. In sum, underlying "all that there is" is so great a structure that it could not exist by happenstance but only by the will of God.

Praise God!

118 posted on 11/29/2004 10:01:45 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Starwind; xzins; Alamo-Girl

It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honor of kings is to search out a matter.
(Proverbs 25:2)


119 posted on 11/29/2004 10:02:52 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Thank you so very much! For right now, I'll just post the link and see what the posters care to excerpt.
120 posted on 11/29/2004 10:05:32 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 361-369 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson