Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Vicomte13
Furthermore, I would consider the term "protestant" to be so overstretched as to have no meaning at all anymore.

Some sects like the Anglican were purely political while the Lutheran and Calvin and Presbyterian and Methodist were dogmatic differences -- note my usage of the past tense as I consider these organisations mostly dead. The political and anti-corruption reasons put forth by Luther did have an effect on the Church and DID cleanse the church of some corruption -- thanks mainly to the counter-reformation by the Jesuits.

Baptists and other pentecostal groups seem quite true, but I do not know their dogma or what they teach

Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, etc. I do not consider Christians

Oriental Churchs such as the Assyrian, Coptic, Ethiopian, I'm still wondering about their validity and won't venture an opinion on something I'm not sure about
138 posted on 10/03/2004 9:32:12 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Cronos

Oriental Churches were offshoots from the one true Church - what happened is as ecumenical councils were held they did not agree with them and thus fell away from the Church. They would not be as Protestants who created their dogma out of whole cloth anew.


140 posted on 10/03/2004 9:47:02 AM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson