Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eucharistic Minister refuses communion to Kerry supporter
National Catholic Reporter ^ | 9/24/2004 | Dennis Corday

Posted on 09/22/2004 6:46:23 PM PDT by sinkspur

Apparently somebody didn’t get the memo. Reader Geoff Garvey of Murrell’s Inlet, S.C., which is in the Charleston diocese, tells me that a eucharistic minister there turned away a communicant who wore a John Kerry for President button to the Communion rail.

Charleston Bishop Robert J. Baker had declared that Catholics in public life, especially elected ones, who didn’t support church teaching on the sanctity of human life “are not to be admitted to Holy Communion.” That came Aug. 4 in a joint letter from Baker, Archbishop John F. Donoghue of Atlanta, Ga., and Bishop Peter J. Jugis of Charlotte, N.C.

But in a pastoral addendum Baker published in his own see, he clarified his position: “No one else may make a decision regarding whether or not a person should be admitted to holy Communion. That determination is reserved to me personally.”

Garvey said that the parish pastor quickly squelched the self-appointed enforcer. When he discovered the incident he called in all eucharistic ministers and told them this action was beyond their purview.


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholicchurch; eucharisticminister
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
This is the reason that no one but pastors should make the decision as to who is refused the Eucharist. Hot-dogging Eucharistic Ministers have no business turning ANYBODY away from the Eucharist.

In Charleston, Baker has reserved that decision to himself.

1 posted on 09/22/2004 6:46:24 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur

Bumping for additional comments.


3 posted on 09/22/2004 7:28:29 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
"All are welcome to take the Eucharist" has NEVER been the teaching of the Church.

All who present themselves for the Eucharist are to be given the Eucharist.

No Eucharistic Minister has the authority to refuse anybody.

If you read the article, Bishop Baker, one of the most conservative bishops in the country, won't even let a pastor turn someone away from the Eucharist. He reserves that to himself.

You're not familiar with liturgical directives, I see.

4 posted on 09/22/2004 7:31:21 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Maybe this LEM should not have taken the law in his own hands, but who wears a political button to church? I think that's worse than the ski wear sKerry wore to Mass in Idaho. I would be appalled at any political buttons or t-shirts at Mass, not only sKerry ones.

In general, a lot of people these days show up wearing anything they want to Mass (OK, now maybe pajamas are acceptable). My old priest would deny communion to any woman wearing pants. Suppose those days are gone.

5 posted on 09/22/2004 7:33:29 PM PDT by Martin Tell (I will not be terrified or Kerrified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: seamole

The minister had no right to deny communion to that person.


6 posted on 09/22/2004 7:35:18 PM PDT by Flightdeck (Ted Kennedy is a disgusting toad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

**but who wears a political button to church? **

Good question -- almost makes one ask, "Did the communicant want this to happen?"


7 posted on 09/22/2004 7:35:50 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck

Oh yes he did. Kerry is pro partial birth abortion. If you are a Catholic and support Kerry then you have chosen to side with the enemy against the ideals of the Catholic Right to Life.


8 posted on 09/22/2004 7:39:25 PM PDT by onefinefeller (The Fall of CBS and the coffin nail of Kerry's campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: onefinefeller

That wasn't John Kerry asking for communion. A person can support a candidate without supporting everything in their platform. I have no idea if that was the case in this situation, and neither did the minister. Even if this person was pro-choice, I don't think a Eucharistic minister should be making that decision.


9 posted on 09/22/2004 7:50:28 PM PDT by Flightdeck (Ted Kennedy is a disgusting toad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Garvey said that the parish pastor quickly squelched the self-appointed enforcer. When he discovered the incident he called in all eucharistic ministers and told them this action was beyond their purview.

Hot-dogging Eucharistic Ministers have no business turning ANYBODY away from the Eucharist.

You're absolutely right. The one who upheld his church-taught values should have resigned from his position as a eucharistic minister rather than succumb to the politics of the church heirarchy. As should all who hold dear the teachings they've been raised on.

Let the priests and their hierarchy sort out when to violate the sanctity of life and when not to. That's what we have them for, after all, isn't it?

Of course, on their way out the door, they might want to ask the priest and Bishop in question which of the teachings the church REALLY means and which it intends them to just pay lip service to.

10 posted on 09/22/2004 8:04:38 PM PDT by No Longer Free State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onefinefeller
you are a Catholic and support Kerry then you have chosen to side with the enemy against the ideals of the Catholic Right to Life.

But the bishop's rule prevails. And he says that no one, not even a pastor, can make the decision to refuse the Eucharist without consulting him.

11 posted on 09/22/2004 8:05:57 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: No Longer Free State

If a EM can't obey the bishop, then, yes, he should resign.


12 posted on 09/22/2004 8:07:23 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flightdeck
That wasn't John Kerry asking for communion. A person can support a candidate without supporting everything in their platform.

Don't insult our intelligence. That person wore the button to mass for a reason. It wasn't because they really like his many positions on taxes.

13 posted on 09/22/2004 8:08:24 PM PDT by No Longer Free State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
If a EM can't obey the bishop, then, yes, he should resign.

Just as he should if he can't stomach the man's politicking.

15 posted on 09/22/2004 8:09:34 PM PDT by No Longer Free State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: seamole
You are, no doubt, familiar with both texts to which I am referring, the Ratzinger Memo and canon 915, each of which require the minister to deny Eucharist. How you can then reconcile your remarks on this thread to your conscience is your own problem.

Uh, someone wearing a Kerry button is not a "publicly unrepentant sinner." The bishop said that he, and he alone, would determine who should not receive the Eucharist.

The fact is, the Eucharistic Minister assumed to himself a decision to which he was not entitled.

16 posted on 09/22/2004 8:13:44 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

>Uh, someone wearing a Kerry button is not a "publicly
>unrepentant sinner."

Would someone wearing an Osama Bin Laden button be a publically unrepentant sinner? Why, or why not?


17 posted on 09/22/2004 8:22:23 PM PDT by applemac_g4 (Oderint dum metuat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
You are right,no one but the pastor,priest or bishop should withhold communion. And that is exactly why we should eliminate all eucharistic ministers. They are not supposed to be assisting at ordinary Masses anyway according to official Vatican documents.

It would be very difficult to give the Body and Blood of Christ to a person who blatantly flaunted His teaching by wearing a button proclaiming support for one who does not follow Him.

Let those who have taken vows to help feed the sheep stand before God on Judgement Day explaining how they "felt" it was the right thing to do.

19 posted on 09/22/2004 8:39:54 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: applemac_g4
Would someone wearing an Osama Bin Laden button be a publically unrepentant sinner? Why, or why not?

Without talking to the person, I would have no idea.

20 posted on 09/22/2004 8:39:56 PM PDT by sinkspur ("John Kerry's gonna win on his juices. "--Cardinal Fanfani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson