[GirlShortstop]

Burke is one that often gets labeled as "traditional" or "arch-conservative" when stories such as this tell a different tale.

Let's see... Hit piece on bishop up front, kinky 'Gay' and 'Lesbian' personals in the back. Burke must be twisting someone's panties. It does have the whiff of scandal, but since the source is the RFT, I'll bet we are getting a very skewed perspective...

If what's said above is accurate, then unfortunately corpus, "the tale" is that your thread posting acumen is in need of tweaking.  Conversely, if the RFT *is* reliable, you've got the goods.  ...what those goods are is tbd.
FReegards.

[Flying Circus]

I may be in San Jose now, but I'm still a St. Louisan at heart. The RFT's mission is to make The Post-Dispatch look positively moderate.

[corpus]

"If what's said above is accurate, then unfortunately corpus, "the tale" is that your thread posting acumen is in need of tweaking. Conversely, if the RFT *is* reliable, you've got the goods. ...what those goods are is tbd.
FReegards."

My original post was in reference to the disobedience of the priest to his bishop who left Archbishop Burke's diocese due to a conflict with his conscience (see Post 1). The reliability of which is based on priests of Burke's previous diocese, as I quoted in Post 1, which also names one of the priests. I wasn't sure if it was "legal" to change the title of someone else's published article in my thread title, which is why I left it as it was, while trying to bring to the table what I caught in the article in Post 1. None of my postings on this thread have related to homosexuality or sexual perversion, nor was it the topic I originally addressed. The "different tale" was in reference to how priests and laymen view their superiors or those who have authority over them, with nothing in reference to the queer agenda of RFT.