The new mass and its implementation were in oppositon to the law of God as given in Quas Pimas by Pope St. Pius V. This law is the law in perpetuity for liturgical matters in the Latin Rite. The result has been that the Church has become the object of the wrath of Sts. Peter and Paul.
What was done had no legal basis even without Quas Primas because the Pope is the guardian of Tradition, not its father, not its creator, not its destroyer.
It is licit and even the duty of Catholics to resist a superior, even a Pope, who opposes the Law of God and the good of souls.
I wouldn't stand on my head waiting for sanity to return to the Church without there being first an abolition of the new mass, a suppression of the Secomd Vatican Council, and the excommunication of any and all bishops who refuse these first two acts. Counter-Revolution may be bloody but it is the surgeon's knife that heals. It could cause a schism but it would give us a firm foundation to start the rebuilding of the Church and Christendom.
I won't be standing on my head waiting for these things to happen but I will be on my knees praying for it.
JMJ --- Roger
Not true. No Pope can bind another pope in matters liturgical, since the form of the Mass is not dogmatic.
You mean to tell me you are avoiding the Precious Blood for lack of a gold spoon?