Posted on 07/26/2004 1:57:27 PM PDT by Lasher
Would like to know if there are any other Christians out there that have not swallowed Rick Warren's version of the Gospel. I left my "seeker-friendly" Church after much prayer and ponder, and it took several months to make the split. I still must speak with my former pastor about this, so until I do, I will not name my former Church. I have noticed that most who follow the "Purpose Driven" material are emotionally attached to it, much like true Christians are emotionally tied to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Thank you for your post! I have been there before! I will post again later to you!
MCD
I do have enormous trouble with what APPEARS AND SOUNDS TO ME LIKE VERY INSIDEOUS INFECTION from the pit into your thinking and even into your feelings--perhaps especially into your feelings about Warren's efforts.
It just appeared/sounded/sounds like there's something greatly lacking in loving the Lord 'with all your heart, mind and soul' IF THERE'S SUCH OPPOSITE EVIDENCE in your attitude, stance toward brother Warren. It seems to me that if you loved The Lord deeply and broadly as you assert--THE LORD would have been more successful at getting you to see the merit in Brother Warren's mission and ways of carrying out his mission as unto and before The Lord.
MCD
I was pleasantly surprised by the book. The book is a great statement of the Sovereignity of God. Not seeker friendly at all. The first sentence is, "It's not about you" A seeker friendly approach would not include this statement.
Go check your bible again, that is a verse... and it is a concept that is repeated throughout all of scripture...
I forgot to use seekETH in searching KJV
Evidently you did not read my later comments.
One still has to balance all those Scriptures by the ones talking about
HE WHO SEEKS ME, SHALL FIND ME.
Interesting that none of you characters on the other side of this discussion tried to incorporate those Scriptures in this discussion.
I suppose I have a bad habit in the RELIGIOUS discussions.
When a group of individuals array on one side of an issue and seem to write rather exclusively from that position, I tend to respond to any of them as though I were responding to all of them.
Not sure how easy it will be to change that habit but I'm willing to work on it.
Sorry.
old thread, but worth reviving.... for anyone else that has recently been made aware of the insidious tentacles of "seeker drivenness" infiltrating their church.
Yes, that's true. But anyone who actually uses the original intent of Scripture doesn't like this book. Rick Warren is as sloppy with his theology as Benny Hinn, Tommy Tenney, and Paul Crouch the Father Of Them all. Boy, Benny Hinn found his niche market too: Sick People who are desperate for healing and gullible enough to be duped into sending money. And boy has his church grown! Must be doing something right!
Your scorn for the Word betrays your infidelity to the Crucified and resurrected Lord. There is none that seeks after God, no not one. We have altogether become worthless. I don't hear that much in Warren's books, can't go against Papa Schuller's teachings about self-esteem (self esteem? "Woe is me for I am a man of unclean lips!" (Jeremiah) "God have mercy on me, a sinner!" (tax collector justified according to Jesus in Luke 18:13-150
And what about Rick's "Global Peace Plan"? the Church is going to solve all the world's problems? Sounds more like AntiChrist to me.
BTW the people in my church that like the book are those that have an agenda to push, and don't care who they hurt, or how much they have to control and strongarm to get it.
Of course, you're one of those KJV only guys as free_life referred to in post 69. Oh that's so very bourgeois...
...
just kidding of course. I totally respect the mindset of KJV only. I would actually rather go back to the original languages if at all possible.
You hit the nail on the head with this statement Quix. It is absolutely true! Some insist they are "walking the walk" while they treat those they consider "sinners" with disrespect, if they address them at all.
Another reason I don't belong to a church. ;)
Yeah, it's tempting, I know.
And you don't have kids. seriously if I didn't have kids I probably would have pulled out a while ago.
THANKS THANKS.
So true.
Am going to cite some Rick Warren statements from his
WHAT ON EARTH AM I HERE FOR
booklet. Excellent stuff--in line with the Bible and PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE, of course.
LUB
Given that you mangled my statements so easily . . . I suppose it should be no surprise that you mangled Rick Warren's.
Sigh.
True. Acceptance of any particular congregational pattern, mentality, construction on spiritual reality, detailed parochial doctrine etc. is not a litmus test of authentic Christianity.
Neither is rejecting what Holy Spirit is doing through Rick Warren a litmus test of super spirituality.
Prissy-ness perhaps, but not super spirituality.
I suppose one could imagine all kinds of things based on Rick Warren's words. But pretending that his clear emphasis that it's NOT about you to = it IS about you is an incredible 180 degree perversion of what Holy Spirit is saying through Rick Warren.
imho, of course.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.