NYer, I am simply asking you to acknowledge Paul's words as inerrant? Is that so difficult?
And I am asking YOU, why you would prefer to foster the comments of St. Paul (whom I love dearly) over the words of an eyewitness, Matthew. I cannot understand why you would disregard the very words spoken by Jesus Christ, to favor those presented by Paul.
I do not understand how you would, as a protestant ... a protestant minister ... one who believes in 'Sola Scriptura', bypass the words of Our Lord, and argue your case on the words of one who set out to destroy the christians but was converted, after Jesus had been resurrected.