And I am asking YOU, why you would prefer to foster the comments of St. Paul (whom I love dearly) over the words of an eyewitness, Matthew. I cannot understand why you would disregard the very words spoken by Jesus Christ, to favor those presented by Paul.
I do not understand how you would, as a protestant ... a protestant minister ... one who believes in 'Sola Scriptura', bypass the words of Our Lord, and argue your case on the words of one who set out to destroy the christians but was converted, after Jesus had been resurrected.
NYer. Your post assumes statements I have not made:
***you would prefer to foster the comments of St. Paul (whom I love dearly) over the words of an eyewitness, Matthew***
I place them on a PARITY level. You are the one elevating one over the other. Reread my posts.
*** cannot understand why you would disregard the very words spoken by Jesus Christ, to favor those presented by Paul.
***
Show in my posts where I do this. Reread my posts.
***I do not understand how you would, as a protestant ... a protestant minister ... one who believes in 'Sola Scriptura', bypass the words of Our Lord, and argue your case on the words of one who set out to destroy the christians but was converted, after Jesus had been resurrected.***
I have done nothing of the sort. I did not bypass Christ's words. Instead I challenged your placing Paul in an inferior position via your analogy, etc. Reread my posts.
Now answer my question. Are Paul's words in 1 Corinthians inerrant?