Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The pastoral care of homosexual persons: Second in a Series
The Catholic Sun ^ | Wednesday, May 19, 2004 | Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted

Posted on 05/19/2004 12:34:43 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler

Bishop Thomas J. Olmsted

The blessing of a chaste life

The pastoral care of homosexual persons

Second in a Series

A few weeks ago, I sent a letter to some priests of the Diocese of Phoenix, asking them to withdraw their support from a public statement entitled “No Longer Silent Phoenix Declaration.” The letter was intended to be personal and confidential because I had hoped to engage these brother priests in a person-to-person conversation about the pastoral care of homosexual persons, without the distraction of publicity. To my disappointment, news of the letter was leaked to the press. While not making my fraternal dialogue with these priests impossible, the leak has made it more difficult.

Nonetheless, I have been able to engage the majority in substantial conversations about this important pastoral matter. And I am grateful that most, in accordance with my request, have withdrawn their support from the declaration. I continue to hope and pray that the others will do the same.

Since portions of my letter have become public, I have decided, for the sake of accuracy and fairness to all, to publish it in its entirety in this same issue of The Catholic Sun. I would like also, in this part of my series on the “Blessing of a Chaste Life,” to write about the pastoral care of homosexual persons: what not to do and what to do.

What not to do

Do not see those with homosexual inclinations as problems but as persons, persons whom Jesus redeemed by His Cross, persons called to holiness, persons with an inviolable dignity and an eternal destiny bestowed on them by God, persons like you and me, persons who have a welcome place in our Church.

Do not condone homosexual activity or fail to teach clearly that it, along with all sexual activity outside of marriage, is seriously wrong. We should not presume that others know that homosexual behavior is wrong. Our silence about it could reinforce that mistaken notion.

Do not support any group such as No Longer Silent or Dignity that fails to uphold clearly the teachings of the Bible and the Church on homosexual acts and homosexual persons. We cannot help one another along the path of conversion and union with Christ if we deny the truth.

What to do

Lend encouragement to groups like Courage that offer support to homosexual persons in their vocation to holiness, and who do this in full conformity with the teachings of the Church.

Be well informed about the teachings of our Catholic Christian faith on this topic.

Read what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says about this topic (#2357-2359).

Read the Letter of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons.

Read good books on this topic such as those by Fr. John Harvey: e.g. “The Homosexual Person” and “Truth about Homosexuality.”

Should you be aware of persons who have homosexual inclinations, accept them as brothers and sisters in Christ and support them by authentic love and prayer.

Should persons you know be engaged in homosexual activity, look for an opportunity to invite them back to the faithful practice of a life of abstinence, assure them of the power of God’s mercy to forgive and to bring fresh hope, and pray for their conversion. Christ calls us all to on-going conversion of life; so our prayers for conversion encompass ourselves as well as others.

These are only a few of the do’s and don’ts of a full program of pastoral care of homosexual persons. The books and documents mentioned above can provide a more encompassing program. As I stated in my letter to my brother priests who signed the declaration, our relationship with homosexual persons needs to be that of Christ, one that offers full and fraternal acceptance of each person as made in the image of God and one that is animated by both truth and charity. When carried out with the help of the Holy Spirit, it can help us all to grow to full maturity in Christ.


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology
KEYWORDS: bishopolmstead; homosexual; phoenix

1 posted on 05/19/2004 12:34:43 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Catholic list ping.


2 posted on 05/19/2004 12:36:07 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Why the long face, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The letter was intended to be personal and confidential because I had hoped to engage these brother priests in a person-to-person conversation about the pastoral care of homosexual persons, without the distraction of publicity. To my disappointment, news of the letter was leaked to the press.

Everything I have heard about Bishop Olmstead makes me believe he is telling the truth. He is not a grandstander, and tried to discuss this privately. It appears that one or more of the priests in question decided to enlist the liberal press in defiance of the Bishop.

3 posted on 05/19/2004 12:46:21 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Why the long face, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Text of Bishop Olmstead's letter to priests
4 posted on 05/19/2004 12:53:19 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Why the long face, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Lend encouragement to groups like Courage that offer support to homosexual persons in their vocation to holiness, and who do this in full conformity with the teachings of the Church.
Encourage:
Encourage is a ministry within Courage dedicated to the spiritual needs of parents, siblings, children, and other relatives and friends of persons who have same-sex attractions.

Standing by the true teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, Encourage members support one another and their loved ones through discussion, prayer and fellowship.

Come join us! If there is no group in your area, consider starting one or consider joining the ListServ.


5 posted on 05/19/2004 8:37:14 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
Everything I have heard about Bishop Olmstead makes me believe he is telling the truth. He is not a grandstander, and tried to discuss this privately.

Did he "discuss" it privately? Or, did he send a letter?

Discussion means face-to-face, and I don't get the impression that Ohlmsted did that.

You and I would have sat down with these guys in a room and hashed this out.

A letter is very impersonal and, as the bishop has discovered, can be abused.

6 posted on 05/19/2004 8:54:08 AM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; Jeff Chandler
Sinkspur,you said to Jeff:You and I would have sat down with these guys and hashed it out.

It always amazes me that you know what others would do in the same or similar situations. I don't know what Jeff would have done and neither do you,especially since none of us know what kind of talks the Bishop may have conducted with all of his priests,separately or as a group at the point he wrote the letter.

But you see,it really does not matter,because the aftermath of the letter shows clearly that the Bishop did exactly the right thing at the right time. Just imagine if he had called them in separately or as a group to have a "discussion" that basicly reflects the content of the letter. It boggles the mind since we know that one of them leaked the letter to the press anyway.

If the Bishop had talked to them,the "leaky" one would have called the press and the press would have called some other signers and the stories would be twisted and spun and would be twisting and spinning to this very day,the press and the priests woould be having a field day.

The Bishop would have been labelled as homophobic,autocratic,mean spirited,unpastoral,rigid,hidebound and insensitive AND there would be no withdrawals of names because the purpose of the "discussion" would be lost in the surrounding argumentation and blah-blah.

I hope this is a lesson for all Bishops and priests and employers,when the facts are clear and the immediate objective is clear put it in writing and move on to the next step. Entirely too much time is spent reinventing the wheel. Dissidents always seek ambiguity in words and situations so they can waffle and weave and waste time.

7 posted on 05/19/2004 10:11:00 AM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

What is to discuss? These priests are traitors. It is inconceivable to me that their formation was so poor and twisted that they would sign such a letter. These men knew full well what they were doing. The bishop needs to ask them to repent and accept the Catholic faith.


8 posted on 05/19/2004 1:19:32 PM PDT by johnb2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: saradippity; sinkspur

Saradippity is correct. Putting it in writing is putting it on the record. It is an effective way of protecting the truth, and keep from being ambushed.

In hindsight, it was a good thing he did put it on the record, because some of these guys are obviously dishonest.


9 posted on 05/19/2004 9:10:56 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Why the long face, John?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson