Well, except for all those pesky "ghost photos" and "fairy photos..."
Right... and show me where ANY scientist has researched those photos and found them to be inexplicable? Show me even the professional PHOTOGRAPHERS who have accepted them as genuine. Gosh, you're right. The shroud ahs faded so far it's invisible.
Gosh, surprise, surprise, surprise. Another non-responsive reply from Orionblamblam.
posted on 04/25/2004 2:23:30 PM PDT
(This tagline shut down for renovations and repairs. Re-open June of 2001.)
> how me where ANY scientist has researched those photos and found them to be inexplicable
Back in Houdini's day, many scientists found the spirit/fairy photos to be inexplicable as anything other than actual evidence of the supernatural. But they were wrong.
Mnay scientists throughout history have found things they felt sure were proof of the supernatural, from spirit photos to UFO photos to, well, you name it. But invariably they have been found to be in error. So, just because one object has been given *minimal* study (and even in that study found to exhibit evidence of fraud... but of course, we are to discount that evidence, because it contradicts the desired outcome), doesn;t mean that *this* object will be the one to prove miracles exist.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson