Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: orionblamblam; shroudie; A.J.Armitage; DestroytheDemocrats
How do you get a leg thats straight in front and bent in back, all at the same time?

How do you know it was "straight"? The fact that the Shroud shows this strange quality of both, is more proof that the Shroud is a genuine gravecloth.

This is going to be a bit long, but bear with me, Orion. Like most apparently obvious things on the Shroud, it isn't obvious or easy.

Orion, the basic problem is that the human mind, yours and mine included, expects to see the Shroud as a photograph. We infer SHADOWS and our minds interpret shadow to represent changes in depth or position because that is what we see in the lighted world.

But, Orion, the Shroud is NOT a photograph. There is no light to be shadowed; no shadow to be processed by our minds into positional information; but our minds STILL want to see it as we expect to see it and process it as such.

Instead, the Shroud is a fairly accurate topographical map of the body it covered, with image intensity providing a proportional indicator of the distance of body to shroud surface. This is why the VP-8 Image Analyzer converts the data into a quasi-three dimensional representation; something that cannot be done with a photograph.

The fact is that the frontal image portion of the shroud drapes over the body to a certain degree, following the contour of the body. The shroud touches some parts of the body that are higher than others, and spans the parts that are lower. If the shroud vertically follows the leg, then the "topographic map" will show only relative distance of body-to-shroud, not body distance to some fixed plane like you would get with a flat photographic plate. This means that we really can not know how high the knees were from the information in the frontal image. Since both legs were approximately equal distance from the shroud part that covers that leg, the image intensity appears to be equal, giving the FALSE impression that the legs are equally "straight".

Consider the situation of having a laprobe on your legs as you sit in a chair. The laprobe is always touching your legs. An image is somehow formed of your legs from top thigh to ankle with essentially equal intensity related to the distance. Unfold the laprobe and you will see an image of what appears to be straight legs, even though, when the image was made, your legs were bent at the knee.

The dorsal image portion of the shroud, the lower cloth which probably was spreadout on a flat stone surface, IS much more like a flat photographic plate than the upper frontal image portion of the shroud which tends to follow the contours of the supine body. This can be seen in the flattened buttocks and shoulders on the dorsal image. Distance from surface of the stone to body on the dorsal image CAN be inferred from the Shroud.

Now we must include the other fact that must be considered. According to every forensic pathologist who has examined the image, the body was in rigor mortis. While it has been straightened as well as possible by the people who placed it on the shroud, when it was on the cross, however, one foot was placed on top of the other to be nailed. It stayed in that position for some time, and was still in that position when rigor set in.

Because of this, the lower body image exhibits some "twist" that is not apparent on the UPPER shroud image because of the topographic mapping nature of the Shroud, but is apparent in the LOWER shroud image where the body-to-shroud distance is roughly equivalent to body-to-flat-rock distance.

The leg that was on top (on the cross) would tend to STILL be forward of the leg that was behind and gravity would create this twist... but the top shroud would not and could not show it because of the drape and distance limits of the image formation.

The leg that was forward, still stiff in rigor, would not press equally as hard on the lower, flat plane portion of the Shroud as the leg that was behind, providing less contact and giving the impression on the Shroud image that the leg was somewhat "bent"... but the weight of the shroud on TOP of the leg would tend to equalize between supporting contacts on the body so that the legs were approximately "equally" distant from their respective portions of the Shroud, giving the impression of being "straight."

Well, Orion, if you're still with me, we got to the end... I hope the trip was worth it.

191 posted on 04/22/2004 11:48:04 PM PDT by Swordmaker (This tagline shut down for renovations and repairs. Re-open June of 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Thank you for the superbly, detailed explanation. Just fascinating!

196 posted on 04/23/2004 8:03:19 AM PDT by NYer (O Promise of God from age to age. O Flower of the Gospel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson