Skip to comments.
Radbertus & Ratramnus: A Ninth Century Debate over the Lord's Supper
Reformation Ink ^
| 2000
| Shane Rosenthal
Posted on 04/08/2004 9:08:23 AM PDT by HarleyD
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
To: polemikos
Jesus used very explicit words, and the Jews understood him literally. Jesus starts off using the Greek phago ("to eat") (Jn 6:49, 50, 52, 53), the typical word for eating, but one which can carry a symbolic meaning.
I agree that why Jesus said that man shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceedith from the mouth of God.
Just because it is spiritual does not mean that it not literal. Something to think about.
To: Warlord David
I agree that why Jesus said that man shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceedith from the mouth of God.
I don't follow your point. You agree with what?
Just because it is spiritual does not mean that it not literal. Something to think about.
Are you saying that you now agree with the literal (Catholic) interpretation of John 6? I don't follow your point.
22
posted on
04/13/2004 9:14:07 AM PDT
by
polemikos
(Ecce Agnus Dei)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-22 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson