Skip to comments.
Reuters PHOTO: "ROMAN CATHOLIC" John Kerry takes communion at AME Church [Is this kosher?]
REUTERS photo (via the Drudge thread) ^
| April 4, 2004
| RonDog
Posted on 04/04/2004 9:26:17 PM PDT by RonDog
Perhaps someone on the RELIGION forum can help us.
On tonight's Drudge thread there is some question as to the propriety of a ROMAN CATHOLIC taking communion in a NON-Catholic church.
See, for instance, my post 321:
To: tgslTakoma
The AP and Reuters stories said that he did take communion. Kerry attended Palm Sunday services, but not at a Catholic Church; he went to the Charles Street AME Church in Boston to take Communion. (It's been a very long time since my Catholic school religion classes, but I seem to remember that it's a big no-no for a Catholic to take Communion in other than a Catholic church. Maybe that rule has changed...)
From
Yahoo! NEWS photos:
Sun Apr 4, 3:16 PM ET
Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Senator John Kerry
(news - web sites) (D-Ma) and his wife Teresa Heinz Kerry (2nd from L)
kneel in prayer with Boston Mayor Tom Menino (3rd from L)
and his wife Angela as they wait to be served communion
during church services at the Charles Street AME Church
in the Dorchester section of Boston April 4, 2004.
REUTERS/Jim Bourg US ELECTION
TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics; Worship
KEYWORDS: apostate; catholiclist; cino; heretic; hughhewitt; proinfanticide
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-199 next last
To: Aliska
Kerry used it as a photo op.
61
posted on
04/05/2004 5:01:58 AM PDT
by
tob2
(Old Fossil and proud of it!)
To: RonDog
Ah, yes, what a quandry. Easter. The one Sunday we Catholics are required to receive Eucharist, after going to Confession, of course.
Kerry has a problem. If he is recognized in the confessional and doesn't make a complete confession he's not supposed to go.
Hmmmm.... Practicing, orthodox Catholics don't take kindly to politicians wanting the rules bent for them.
62
posted on
04/05/2004 5:04:58 AM PDT
by
Desdemona
(Proverbs 18:2 A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.)
To: RonDog
I think that since they do not believe it is the body and blood of Jesus Christ he was more or less just having a cracker with them. What's wrong with that?
63
posted on
04/05/2004 5:06:57 AM PDT
by
rudyrudy
To: RonDog
64
posted on
04/05/2004 5:07:01 AM PDT
by
RonDog
To: RonDog; narses
What Say You? Let's forget it's John Kerry.
Let's pretend it's Joe Lieberman. Would it seem strange?
Same thing...
65
posted on
04/05/2004 5:16:15 AM PDT
by
Jalapeno
To: .45MAN
Yet another reason for this heretic to be excommunicated. If Rome continues to do nothing, they are saying their faith means nothing.
66
posted on
04/05/2004 5:28:49 AM PDT
by
kjvail
To: Desdemona
With these photographs, though, I don't know how anyone could doubt his insincerity any longer he's not just making a mockery of his own religion but he's also making a mockery of others religious beliefs
Kerry is a disgrace
67
posted on
04/05/2004 5:29:16 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(Make Michael Moore cry.... DONATE MONTHLY!!!)
To: rudyrudy
I think that since they do not believe it is the body and blood of Jesus Christ he was more or less just having a cracker with them.
What's wrong with that?
See also this PARODY, from
www.scrappleface.com:
Kerry Calls Pope's Abortion Stance 'Not Nuanced'(2004-03-29) -- The strict anti-abortion stance of Pope John Paul II is "tragically not nuanced," according to U.S. Democrat presidential candidate John Forbes Kerry, a practicing Roman Catholic.
"I pray for an America where rosary beads are sold in abortion clinic gift shops," said Mr. Kerry. "But I won't be a Catholic president, or even, as John F. Kennedy called himself, 'a president who happens to be Catholic'. I will be a president who happens to say he is Catholic but doesn't feel constrained by the black-and-white teachings of a church which is the bedrock of values, of sureness about who I am."
Mr. Kerry made the remarks as he left Sunday Mass at the Cathedral of Our Lady of Flexible Doctrine...
68
posted on
04/05/2004 5:32:22 AM PDT
by
RonDog
To: RonDog
Kerry is not Catholic.
I am. I love the Church and I love what it states. I love the Eucharist and believe Christ is present Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity.
Kerry's photo-op is making a mockery of his claim to Catholicism.
69
posted on
04/05/2004 5:51:02 AM PDT
by
OpusatFR
(Brain freeze. Mind farts. No tagline today......)
To: OpusatFR
Kerry is not Catholic.
I am. I love the Church and I love what it states. I love the Eucharist and believe Christ is present Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity.
Kerry's photo-op is making a mockery of his claim to Catholicism.
AMEN!
To: Mr. Thorne
I believe that Russian and Greek Orthodox Churches may fall under this umbrella, being Eastern rather than Latin Rite. That's correct. The two branches of Catholicism (Eastern and Western) recognize each other's sacraments. That's why, for example, a marriage performed in an Eastern Orthodox Church is fully valid in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church.
71
posted on
04/05/2004 6:28:14 AM PDT
by
Modernman
(Chthulhu for President! Why Vote for the Lesser Evil?)
To: RonDog
"We're thankful that there's going to be a revolution in this country ... a new movement," the Rev. Gregory Groover saidfrom the pulpit during the Palm Sunday service. "And we say, God, bring him on, the next president of the United States." Why is it that this kind of blatant politicking is allowed by the IRS in "black" churches, but not in other churches?
Frankly, I think it should be allowed, but in all churches, not just black ones.
72
posted on
04/05/2004 6:32:29 AM PDT
by
B Knotts
(Salve!)
To: patent
Only exception I know if is in an Orthodox Church under very limited circumstances (you can't find a Catholic Church). My understanding was that you could receive at an Orthodox Church (or SSPX, or anyone else who believes in the Real Presence) if you are there for the Mass (like a wedding or funeral, for example)if you are specifically invited by the presiding priest.
I certainly hope this is the case, because we have dear Russian Orthodox friends whose five children's weddings we attended and we received Communion after being specifically invited to do so.
73
posted on
04/05/2004 6:34:38 AM PDT
by
old and tired
(Go Toomey! Send Specter back to the Highlands!)
To: Desdemona; patent; NYer; m4629; Mr. Thorne; Aliska
Practicing, orthodox Catholics weren't going to vote for the baby killing Kerry anyway. Just read the words of this idiot:
My friends, you won the right to choose [abortion]. It didn't just happen. People made it happen. Women most of all. Now we need to work just as hard to protect it...We can't go back. We will never go back. We will never, ever let this right be taken away! ( NARAL Pro-Choice America Dinner, 2003)
Abortions need to be moved out of the fringes of medicine and into the mainstream of medical practice. And by the same token, if our children are to be safe from the danger of fanaticism, tolerance needs to spread out of the mainstream churches, mosques, and synagogues, and into the religious fringes." (congressional record)
74
posted on
04/05/2004 7:05:59 AM PDT
by
old and tired
(Go Toomey! Send Specter back to the Highlands!)
To: old and tired
>>>>My understanding was that you could receive at an Orthodox Church (or SSPX, or anyone else who believes in the Real Presence) if you are there for the Mass (like a wedding or funeral, for example)if you are specifically invited by the presiding priest.
Not trying to start another SSPX flame war, but I wouldn't have included them in the provision here.
As to your receipt, my understanding is that your circumstances weren't appropriate, it has to be a situation where you can't make it to a Catholic Church. That said, I doubt anyone is going to be critical of your actions.
patent
75
posted on
04/05/2004 7:10:52 AM PDT
by
patent
(A baby is God's opinion that life should go on. Carl Sandburg)
To: patent; All
As to your receipt, my understanding is that your circumstances weren't appropriate Well, I know my wife checked on it back in the eighties, and then we just went with it for the rest of the times.
I would like to know definitively, though, because there will undoubtedly be more instances where we will be at a Russian Orthodox Church.
76
posted on
04/05/2004 7:15:46 AM PDT
by
old and tired
(Go Toomey! Send Specter back to the Highlands!)
To: rudyrudy
I think that since they do not believe it is the body and blood of Jesus Christ he was more or less just having a cracker with them. What's wrong with that? Primarily, it's an expression of a unity (communion means "union with") between the Catholic Church and this other Protestant faith that is not there. So it's a lie.
And by engaging in what a Catholic can only believe, as you said, is a "cracker," he is expressing for the world what is called "indifferentism," the idea that taking the True Sacrament in a Catholic Church and taking a symbolic communion in an AME church are equivalent. That what religion you profess and where you worship is not important.
SD
To: Notwithstanding; ultima ratio; dubyaismypresident
***Kissing a book is neither a sacrament nor a statement of faith.***
"a book" in this case is the KORAN -- did ya miss that?
Sacrament? Not yet at least.
Statement of Faith? Don't be so sure.
78
posted on
04/05/2004 7:26:50 AM PDT
by
drstevej
To: old and tired
I would like to know definitively, though, because there will undoubtedly be more instances where we will be at a Russian Orthodox Church. I am sure that the Catholic position is that an Orthodox priest may be sought out for sacraments only in situations of grave emergency and where one's own clergy is not available. And that likewise, a Catholic priest would serve an Orthodox member in such a situation.
I have read, though nowhere official, that the Orthodox do not have such a provision in their code.
In any event, a wedding is not a grave emergency. Though a case could be made for being gracious in accepting an invitation from an Orthodox priest. Certainly the issue of the sacrament's validity is not in question.
SD
To: drstevej
Give it a rest, Steve. Join the Kerry-Kondemnation. Be a uniter, not a divider.
SD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson