Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hutton Gibson Interview Partial Transcript
Speak Your Piece ^ | 2-20-04

Posted on 02/20/2004 5:00:26 PM PST by SJackson

Speak Your Piece 620AM www. speakyourpiece. net

Hutton Gibson Interview Partial Transcript

I. The Holocaust

Steve Feuerstein

What was this event called the Holocaust?

Gibson

In the first place the Holocaust is a terrible misnomer. First of all a Holocaust is a burnt offering to G-d. Now these people were not offering themselves up to G-d. If these people were being killed they were being taken there screaming howling and yelling for they were being persecuted and murdered. That is not a Holocaust.

Secondly there were not that many Jews under Hitler's power under his sway. They claimed that there were 6.2 million in Poland before the war and after the war there were 200,000 therefore he (Hitler) must have killed six million of them. They simply got up and left! They were all over the Bronx and Brooklyn and Sydney and Los Angeles.

Everybody was out to get Hitler but you know he was not that efficient. I've known a lot of Germans. The society I went to school to were Germans and they were thorough they were good teachers. They were efficient and they know how to do things. If they had set out to kill six million Jews they would have done it.

But all we hear about is Holocaust survivors. "Oh, we know it happened, cause over there is a survivor. Oh, my moth-er and father were survivors," they say. This is absolutely ridiculous. And (the Holocaust) it's all -maybe not all fiction -but most of it is. For instance the gas chambers and crematoria at Auschwitz would not do the job. Do you know what it takes to get rid of a dead body? To cremate it? It takes a liter of petrol and 20 minutes Ð now six million of them? They (the Germans) did not have the gas to do it. That's why they lost the war.

Regarding the gas chamber, the gas was going the wrong way. You see it was going down instead of up.

II. The Concentration Camps

Steve Feuerstein

Why didn't FDR bomb the tracks?

Gibson

You see the concentration camps were filled with people who had to be fed. And when they did bomb the tracks they could not see them any more. And that's where you're sup-posed Holocaust came in.

You see these were work camps.

Guess who owned the railroads? The JewsÉ IG Farbin Industries was never touched it was making munitions and doing all things to keep them in the war. The Group Works they also weren't bombed. All they had to do was bomb the group works but they were owned by the Jews. They owned the tracks and the banks so you don't bomb your own stuff. They owned the banking the banking system. Hitler's big crime was operating without the big banks (and the Jews). Just like Russia it had to go since it had no debt.

III. World War II

Steve Feuerstein

Why did you enlist if you were against US involvement in WWII?

Gibson

Came the war (WWII) and I knew my Roosevelt. I knew he would get us into it. So I vol-unteered.

My combat time consisted of four months in Guadalcanal. We all ended up with Malaria, it never goes away. I was with the 132nd infantry. They were holding a perimeter of an airstrip. The marines came in and mowed the place, flattened it out. We flattened out the area before the Japs came in. The Japs you know can't adapt. They come into a situation and they don't change their orders they simply continue and do what their told. An officer (Japanese) stands there and he points two this way and two that way.

Anyway, the marines in the area never heard so much fire in their life rifle fire or whatev-er type of fire. In the morning there were 800 dead Japs in the open field that they hoped to sneak through. And the next night the fools didn't do any better the fools came back and lost 700 and the third night after they lost 600. We had to clean up the bodies each morning so they could have room to move in the next day.

During WWII they were giving us this jazz. They said we were attacked. Well alright but we didn't realize that at that time the attack was a put up job by "the man" -I am talking about our beloved FDR who had practically forced the Japanese to attack and destroy the entire Pacific Fleet. They knew they were coming in Washington. FDR pushed us into the war.

It was FDRs own private war. He went there for money. The money power that runs this country. The Fed Reserve and those foreign bankers who own our currency and charge us for it. The foreign bankers who run the international reserve like the Rothchilds and their allies in this country like the Rockerfellers who were Jews and others who own the money.

We have given the whole control to the Fed Reserve. Greenspan tells us what to do.

Someone should take him out and hang him. The Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegies are all communists. They are enemies of the country.

When they want to pull the plug on us we're going down the drain. There is a book out not too long ago listing the big Jewish families in the country which lists the Rockefellers as Jewish and there was no protest.

IV. The Jews & Money

Steve Feuerstein

Why Do the Jews construct Holocaust Museums?

Gibson

There are too many survivors. It's just a gimmick to collect money.

They have to go where there is money. There is no way they would come to West Virginia. They have to have some place to go that has money. They didn't work in the mines you can bet your boots no they don't work anywhere where they can get out of it. They're great pencil pushers they are the superior people and therefore they are enti-tled to the top jobs supervisory stuff and so on because they hire each other

They have so much influence in the banks for instance They all look out for one another you got to give them that. They are at the same time willing to sacrifice a few of theirs if it helps

V. Reparations

Steve Feuerstein

And the demand for reparations?

Gibson

Why all the reparations? It's an irresistible chance to make money. All those Holocaust museums put up at our expense with our tax payer dollars.

VI. Jewish World Domination

Steve Feuerstein

What do the Jews aim to achieve?

Gibson

I don't know what their (the Jews) agenda is except that it's all about control. They're after one world religion and one world government. That's why they've attacked the Catholic Church so strongly, to ultimately take control over it by their doctrine and make one world religion and one world government.

VII. Rabbi Marvin Heir

Steve Feuerstein

Your concerned about Mel's health?

Gibson

"The rabbi for hire" that's even what the Jews refer to him as. He had one of these snarley voices. These people are vengeance bound. They will chase down people like Demjanjuk they almost got him killed and eventually it was proved innocent of all charges. Yeah, Ivan the Terrible, they said.

VIII. ADL

Steve Feuerstein

Why did the ADL oppose the film?

Gibson

This is part of their deal they don't want this movie shown they don't care if the movie is anti-Semitic or not, or if it is straight history. Mel says he absolutely couldn't buy PR like this. And (thanks to the ADL) everybody knows the line now: Let the blood be upon us and our children.

IX. The Pope & The Vatican

Steve Feuerstein

What do you aim to achieve by screening the film before the vatican Ð Why did you need the Pope's Approval?

Gibson

And anyway somebody said why do you suppose he (the Pope) approved the movie? I said what do you think he would say when it comes out and he disapproved it.

The ones that we have there (in the Vatican) are all involved in the (Jewish) plot. The need of the Vatican endorsement wasn't, it just wasn't needed at all. The only reason they went over is that the ADL had threatened to take the film over and show it to them.

They would have to steal it to do so they did already. One of the guys in the office said why don't we take it over to the Vatican and show it to them anyway cause they wanted to see it and they did want to see it. And Mel said "OK lets take it over and show it to them." They were not after any accolade. They just wanted to take it away from the ADL who was going to go in there and put some pressure on like they can and get a condem-nation of it.

No, no we had no idea of helping out the Vatican in any way. You see here we have what we call a hostile witness. As Mel said while they were on the way over, "What is he going to say is he going to condemn it because when it comes out he'll show what a big ass he is." What the heck could he say? The Jews were going to take it to the Vatican this was the argument from one his producers there, Steve McEveety. Mel said "Go ahead. Let us do it." The ADL might have even taken a few shots themselves and shown the Pope something that was not in the film. There is nothing these guys would not do

X. Jesus

Steve Feuerstein

What is the plot that you keep referring to?

Gibson

They (the Sanhedrin) had a good thing going in the temple they were selling the victims to be sacrificed. And he went in and overturned their tables he tried once before but this they had enough reason to get rid of him. That's one of the charges they put against him that he put himself equal to G-d. And this is blasphemy and therefore it deserves death.

They knew what he was after and they were killing him just for that. They cannot admit that they were wrong. They have been at it for all of history.

Is the Jew still actively anti-Christian -He is, for by being a Jew, he is anti everyone else.

XI. Eye For An Eye

Gibson Continues

They are the people with an eye for eye and tooth for a tooth. They must have revenge. You know they (the Jews) caused the Roman persecutions too. They called attention to the fact that the Christians were refusing to offer incense to the emperors when the emperors became gods. The Jews were notable for getting the wood to burn the Christians a labor of love you could say.

To a Jew a Christian commits idolatry every time a he looks at a crucifix and says a prayer. You know there in control and they're going to get in control the way things are going. Because they get all of our people They killed several generations of us Americans (referring to WWI, WWII)É The Jews weren't in the army much in WWI that because they were fomenting a revolt in Russia. America had no right to fight in foreign wars (in reference to WWI and WWII).

XII. Revolution in America: Bloodless or Violent

Steve Feuerstein

What is going to become of our country here in america?

Gibson

We're going to have to do something now in this country because that government is use-less.

There's a line the Declaration of Independence where somebody abolishes or sets aside or misgoverns it is our privilege the constitution it is the peoples obligation to abol-ish that government. I think there is a wayÉ There is a bloodless way to do it if we can swing it: secession. Just get all states to secede from the government and leave it there high and dry.

The alternative is eventually they are going to clamp down on us and we are going to have the same terror and we are going to have to revolt with a gun or we are going to face the same (governmental) terrorÉ Were going to have to do something fairly soon because the longer it goes the more power they get and the less we have.


TOPICS: Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: SJackson
If this transcript is authentic it proves that Hutton Gibson is a possessed and evil man who desperately needs repentance, forgiveness, and healing. Pray for him. Pray that his words are publicly rebuked and do not lead to violence.
21 posted on 02/22/2004 1:05:13 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
He doesn't deny it, the film's publicist doesn't deny it. The questions were straightforward, the responses relative to Jews cookie cutter antisemitic. He's said all these things in the past. I've no doubt it's authentic, though doubters can listen to the broadcast Monday night.
22 posted on 02/22/2004 1:52:58 PM PST by SJackson (Visit http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
He doesn't deny it, the film's publicist doesn't deny it. The questions were straightforward, the responses relative to Jews cookie cutter antisemitic. He's said all these things in the past. I've no doubt it's authentic, though doubters can listen to the broadcast Monday night.

I only qualify it because the means used to obtain the interview were dishonest. I doubt the integrity of the radio show personnel. I already know about Hutton Gibson's lack of integrity, etc.

23 posted on 02/22/2004 6:00:30 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I only qualify it because the means used to obtain the interview were dishonest.

Maybe, maybe not, there's two sides to that. Presuming the transcript is accurate (and it conforms to the recordings at the website), this was clearly a question and answer session. IMO, it was an interview. BTW, aside from doing a sports talk show as the article notes, he does a twice a week show on political and Jewish issues, which this interview was for.

Interviewer Denies Tricking Gibson's Dad

The sports talk radio host who interviewed Mel Gibson's father last week is denying that he tricked the 85-year-old man into giving him a series of explosive quotes attacking Jews.

"He knew exactly what was going on," Steve Feuerstein, who interviewed the elder Gibson for the Talkline Communications Network, told WABC Radio's Steve Malzberg on Sunday.

"When I air my show, people will hear me talk to him . . . about airing the show and about how much I'm looking forward to sharing his views with my listeners," Feuerstein said. "This man knew 100 percent what was going on."

On Thursday, Gibson family sources told NewsMax.com that Feuerstein never told Mr. Gibson he was being taped for broadcast, identified himself only as "Steve" and said he was a fan of Mel Gibson who wanted to congratulate the Hollywood star's father on the movie "The Passion of Christ," due for release this Wednesday.

As he had in a previous interview, the elder Gibson raised suspicions that he's anti-Semitic, telling Feuerstein that he believed Jews had exaggerated the Holocaust and were pursuing "one world religion and one world government."

But NewsMax.com's James Hirsen, who has covered the making of "Passion" extensively, said Thursday that while Hutton Gibson's comments were "indefensible," they're also "irrelevant."

"Mel's dad didn't make the movie; Mel Gibson did," he told Fox News Radio's Alan Colmes.

On Friday, Catholic League President William Donohue said reporters were using Gibson's father unfairly in a bid to discredit his son's movie.

"They’re going after Mel's 85-year-old father. . . . . Make no mistake about it, those obsessed with killing this movie will not manipulate Bill Donohue into berating Hutton Gibson. Nor will they push me to ask for information on how I can contact their fathers, though the thought is tempting."

24 posted on 02/23/2004 8:01:24 AM PST by SJackson (Visit http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"They’re going after Mel's 85-year-old father. . . . .

No, they are going after what Mel's father, who is now 85 years old, has been saying and writing for some number of years. It does matter that he is Mel's father because he garners more publicity and cover that way. His views must be publicly repudiated by all genuine Christians.

Make no mistake about it, those obsessed with killing this movie will not manipulate Bill Donohue into berating Hutton Gibson.

This is the part that troubles me the most. It equates Hutton Gibson's views with the movie. They are separate in my mind. I can't understand how Bill Donohue can be a genuine Christian and not condemn Hutton Gibson's views. It makes no sense to me. It's as if the movie has no effect on him, at least no positive effect.

25 posted on 02/23/2004 3:32:43 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I agree with you completly. While I can separate Mel from Huttion, clearly many of the films supporters, including Donohue, are willing to let the film take on the baggage of holocaust denial and clear cut antisemitism. It's a connection they shouldn't be making. The fact that Bill Donohue won't condemn Hutton's views is troubling. He should keep his mouth shut.
26 posted on 02/23/2004 3:55:03 PM PST by SJackson (Visit http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
BTW, don't know if you're interested, but the broadcast is at 10pm eastern (I think) at http://www.speakyourpiece.net/
27 posted on 02/23/2004 3:56:09 PM PST by SJackson (Visit http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Do you think Hutton hates Jews as much as Foxman hates Catholics?
28 posted on 02/23/2004 4:07:58 PM PST by Diago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diago
Moral equivalencies really don't cut it.

Foxman's a sleaze, but I doubt he hates Catholics. He may not like the politically conservative ones, but there are plenty of liberal Catholics, and protestants too, for him to cavort with.

He shouldn't have anything to do with politics, but he takes liberal positions anyway, but I've never seen him suggest hanging his opponents.

Hutton's a clear cut antisemitie, if you want to defend him, be my guest, start with the comments at the top of the thread.

29 posted on 02/23/2004 4:12:57 PM PST by SJackson (Visit http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Hutton's a clear cut antisemitie, if you want to defend him, be my guest, start with the comments at the top of the thread.

I am not willing to defend Hutton (an obscure and unimportant figure) , but you appear to be all to willing to defend the character assassin Foxman (a well-recognized Jewish leader.)

30 posted on 02/23/2004 4:27:17 PM PST by Diago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Diago
I am not willing to defend Hutton (an obscure and unimportant figure) , but you appear to be all to willing to defend the character assassin Foxman (a well-recognized Jewish leader.)

Sorry, you made that up. Feel free to post examples though.

31 posted on 02/23/2004 4:28:47 PM PST by SJackson (Visit http://www.JewPoint.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson