[PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain]

Yes it's porn, IMO. Yes it's a portraly of real life, but it is also shown to get a reaction. That is the problem. No matter how soft it is, nudity is shown to get a reaction.

In the "old day's" there was no nudity. They still got their points across tho.

Becky

[Texas2step]

Yes it's porn, IMO.

And I respect your opinion of what you consider to be porn.

Now, back to the article. In your opinion, is the author correct to characterize Monica Bellucci as a "porn star"?

If so, should we characterize all actors and actresses who have filmed nude or partially nude scenes as porn stars?

Do you believe she could have gotten away with making this statement had the actress in question been Meryl Streep or Nicole Kidman?

If not, don't you think that this characterization of Monica Bellucci is disingenious, or twisted, to make something fit her agenda because Monica plays the part of Mary Magdelene?

[al_c]

I agree with that, Becky.