Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; editor-surveyor
Yes it's porn, IMO.

And I respect your opinion of what you consider to be porn.

Now, back to the article. In your opinion, is the author correct to characterize Monica Bellucci as a "porn star"?

If so, should we characterize all actors and actresses who have filmed nude or partially nude scenes as porn stars?

Do you believe she could have gotten away with making this statement had the actress in question been Meryl Streep or Nicole Kidman?

If not, don't you think that this characterization of Monica Bellucci is disingenious, or twisted, to make something fit her agenda because Monica plays the part of Mary Magdelene?
87 posted on 02/19/2004 9:56:10 AM PST by Texas2step (Reformed passion thread instigator ... but don't tell anyone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: Texas2step
Now, back to the article. In your opinion, is the author correct to characterize Monica Bellucci as a "porn star"?

Yes.

If so, should we characterize all actors and actresses who have filmed nude or partially nude scenes as porn stars?

Yes

Do you believe she could have gotten away with making this statement had the actress in question been Meryl Streep or Nicole Kidman?

Could she....she should. Free speech and all:) Would she, I don't know.

If not, don't you think that this characterization of Monica Bellucci is disingenious, or twisted, to make something fit her agenda because Monica plays the part of Mary Magdelene?

If the author is true to her beliefs, she should say it. In reality I don't know if she would or not. That isn't the point here tho. We can only say what each of us believes. IMO, They are all guilty of pornography.

Becky

89 posted on 02/19/2004 10:03:55 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Texas2step
"If not, don't you think that this characterization of Monica Bellucci is disingenious, or twisted, to make something fit her agenda..."

Having read much of what The Ahos and their associates have written in recent years, I feel confidant to say that her 'agenda' is to prove that the Freemason / Knights Templar conspiracy is in substantial control of most significant events. I find it difficult to believe, although I personally know that in their wildest dreams, said 'illuminated' masons (not rank and file members) would love to have such power.

"...rather than what you believe I believe."

I have to confess that I don't know what you believe, and I was not attempting to ascribe any set of views to you.

91 posted on 02/19/2004 10:15:42 AM PST by editor-surveyor ( . Best policy RE: Environmentalists, - ZERO TOLERANCE !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: Texas2step; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Now, back to the article. In your opinion, is the author correct to characterize Monica Bellucci as a "porn star"?

As most of the world would definite it ...no.

If so, should we characterize all actors and actresses who have filmed nude or partially nude scenes as porn stars?

Sure! Then maybe they'd stop making nudity a standard part of everything coming out of Hollyweird. ;o)

98 posted on 02/19/2004 11:13:33 AM PST by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson