Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIME: What is time and when did time start?
Biblical Theology ^ | Biblical Theology

Posted on 02/05/2004 3:20:50 PM PST by xzins

TIME

What is time and when did time start? Many think that time started when the God created the world. It is true that the way that man keeps track of time is based on the physical universe. Minutes, hours, days, weeks, months and years are all related to the earth's rotation around the sun. This does not mean that time did not exist before the creation of the world.

For a proper understanding of time, a person must understand that God is both an uncreated eternal being and a creator. He has many natural uncreated attributes or characteristics. These attributes exist out of necessity because they are part of God's uncreated eternal being. God has always existed; He has no beginning. God did not create Himself nor did He create any of His natural attributes. For example, God did not create His power. His power, like Himself, has no beginning. His power has its foundation in God's uncreated essence.

God has many uncreated natural attributes some these are:

1. He is an uncreated eternal being.

2. He has all possible knowledge. There is no knowledge that God lacks. There is nothing knowable that He does not know.

3. He can be in all possible places at once.

4. He has all possible power. There is no greater power then God. God can do all things that are possible.

5. He has all possible wisdom.

6. He has a will and the freedom to make choices.

God is also a creator. The things He creates exist out of His free choice. Some people get upset when they hear that God has limitations. They fail to understand that God did not create any of his natural attributes. These attributes are part of God's eternal make-up. He can not change the facts of these natural attributes any more than he change the fact that He exists. For example, God cannot change the fact that He has all power. He can choose how He uses His power but He cannot choose to have less power. God also cannot change the fact He has all knowledge. He can not choose to have less knowledge.

God is both uncreated and a creator. To help clarify this idea, study the following charts.

CHART ONE

God's natural attributes
God's creations

This is God's uncreated and eternal being. God has no free choice over having these attributes. They exist out of necessity because these must exist since God Himself exists.


This is what God freely chooses to do with His natural abilities. These are the result of His own free choice and not just the result of uncreated fact.

CHART TWO


God's eternal uncreated being.
His natural attributes.
---------------------------
God's free will

*
*


This is what God chooses to
do with His Natual attributes.

God's natural attributes exist out of necessity. God's creations exist out of free choice. God's real value and worth are not judged just by the facts of His natural attributes. The fact that God is an uncreated eternal being and has all power does not give Him any praise worthiness or value. What if God chose to use His power for selfish reasons or in some inappropriate way? It is what God chooses to do with what He has that gives Him true value and praise.

Time is also a natural attribute of God. God did not create time. Time is apart of God's eternal uncreated essence and make-up. Just like the other natural attributes, God cannot control the fact of it. He can not be outside of it nor separate Himself from it. He is time and nothing that He ever does will change this fact. Time, like God, has no beginning or end.

God is a eternal being that has an active intelligence. Isaiah 55:9"For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." He is always thinking. It is impossible for Him not to have any active thoughts at all. Before He created the world the passage of time was marked by different thoughts and ideas. Time is the succession of duration. This means that time marks the passage of ideas, thoughts and events. God may think a thought for some interval and then think a different thought.

Time must be linear. Once God thinks a certain thought He cannot somehow go back in succession. He can create something and then destroy it, but it did exist for some interval or duration. He can not travel back in time before he created it. No matter what God did He could never undo any of His actions or thoughts as though they never existed. God cannot think a thought and then unthink it. God can think a different thought and change His mind, but He can never go back in time or the series of events. God is very personal and active. He has made many choices and will continue to make many more.

God has a free will. His thoughts are really his own creation. God is part of an endless and continuous sequence of thoughts, ideas and actions. Once God thinks a thought it becomes forever embedded in the essence of time.

Thought-1

*

Thought-2

*

Thought-3

If God is at thought-3 then no matter what He does, He will never undo thoughts 1 and 2. Thoughts 1 and 2 are now totally out of His control. He may think thought 4 that is 180 degrees opposite of thought 2, but He may never change the fact that thought 2 existed.

It is not possible for God to go into the future in the series of events.

The future does not exist yet. Every thought of God is His own creation and must be a part of His endless duration. Every idea, thought or action of God must of necessity have some duration or interval of existence. In the sequence of events there is some interval before a creation, the creation itself and the interval after the creation. Each creation or thought of God must have these three basic truths. Every creation of God must take place within a series of events. It is impossible for any creation not to have these three truths.

God created man because he wanted intelligent creatures that he could share His love with. God created man in His own image, after His likeness. This refers to man's moral make-up, not his physical design. God has free choice and has created man with the freedom of choice. God has given man the ability to determine and create his own character, either good or evil. God his given each person the power and freedom to create their own thoughts ideas, and actions. Each person creates his own moral character. This means that any person has the freedom to become evil, rebellious and wicked or holy, obedient and righteous.

There are two types of law, physical necessity and free action. For example the law of gravity is a physical law. If you hold up a brick and then let go, it must fall. You will always get the same result no matter how often you do this. Physical law is a course or rule of action that has a fixed and certain result. There is no free choice involved and no other course possible. God's natural attributes are under physical law because they exist out of necessity and not free choice.

True freedom must involve choice. The choices any person makes are not fixed or certain. Freedom of action implies different responses to the same effects. The future resulting actions or choices of any free being are not certain or fixed. These future choices have not been created and in the series of events do not exist yet. Since future chooses do not exist until they are made, the knowledge of result cannot exist until the choice is made. This means that the future choices of a free being cannot be knowledge. No one can know them including God.

Animals do not have a free will and their actions and course are certain and fixed. They are governed by physical law. God created them with instinct. They do not have the power or ability to create any new thoughts. They are not moral creatures.

Genesis 6:5-7"And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.

And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart. And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

If God knew all the future choices of man He could not have been sorry or grief for what he knew would take place. It is not possible for God to be sorry for something that He knew for a fact that would take place.

When God told Abraham to slay his son He was not certain in advance if Abraham would be willing to kill his son.

Genesis 22:12"And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only son from me."

God did not know the evil that certain people would do. In fact the idea of this evil happening never even came into God's mind.

Jeremiah 19:5"They have built also the high places of Baal, to burn their sons with fire for burnt offerings unto Baal, which I commanded not, nor spake it, neither came it into my mind."

Jeremiah 32:35"And they built the high places of Baal, which are in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to cause their sons and their daughters to pass through the fire unto Molech; which I commanded them not, neither came it into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin."

God did not know of Saul's future disobedience. If God knew in advance that Saul would turn against Him, why did He appoint him as king and then regret it?

1 Samuel 15:11"It repenteth me that I have set up Saul to be king: for he is turned back from following me, and hath not performed my commandments. And it grieved Samuel; and he cried unto the LORD all night."

Prayer can change God's mind and plans.

Exodus 32:9-14"And the LORD said unto Moses, I have seen this people, and, behold, it is a stiffnecked people: Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation. And Moses besought the LORD his God, and said, LORD, why doth thy wrath wax hot against thy people, which thou hast brought forth out of the land of Egypt with great power, and with a mighty hand? Wherefore should the Egyptians speak, and say, For mischief did he bring them out, to slay them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth? Turn from thy fierce wrath, and repent of this evil against thy people. Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou swarest by thine own self, and saidst unto them, I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have spoken of will I give unto your seed, and they shall inherit it for ever. And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people."

2 Kings 20:1-6"In those days was Hezekiah sick unto death. And the prophet Isaiah the son of Amoz came to him, and said unto him, Thus saith the LORD, Set thine house in order; for thou shalt die, and not live. Then he turned his face to the wall, and prayed unto the LORD, saying, I beseech thee, O LORD, remember now how I have walked before thee in truth and with a perfect heart, and have done that which is good in thy sight. And Hezekiah wept sore. And it came to pass, afore Isaiah was gone out into the middle court, that the word of the LORD came to him, saying, Turn again, and tell Hezekiah the captain of my people, Thus saith the LORD, the God of David thy father, I have heard thy prayer, I have seen thy tears: behold, I will heal thee: on the third day thou shalt go up unto the house of the LORD. And I will add unto thy days fifteen years; and I will deliver thee and this city out of the hand of the king of Assyria; and I will defend this city for mine own sake, and for my servant David's sake.

Jonah 3:4-10"And Jonah began to enter into the city a day's journey, and he cried, and said, Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown. So the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them. For word came unto the king of Nineveh, and he arose from his throne, and he laid his robe from him, and covered him with sackcloth, and sat in ashes. And he caused it to be proclaimed and published through Nineveh by the decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not feed, nor drink water:

But let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that is in their hands. Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away from his fierce anger, that we perish not? And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.

If all the future choices of man were knowledge this would set aside free will. The only way God could be certain of the future choice of a free being is if He forced it. If God ever causes an individual to do something then God is truly responsible for this person's actions whether good or bad. If God really knew for a fact all the future choices of Adolf Hitler then He would be partly responsible for his actions. God could have easily prevented him from being born. Adolf Hitler had freedom and created his own evil character. Even our law would find a person guilty if he had the knowledge of an future evil act and then did nothing to prevent it. The law would hold him responsible for this knowledge and not doing anything about it. God is never responsible for any future created choice a free being makes because it is a free choice and not knowable in advance.

Each person has the creative ability to bring forth thoughts, ideas and actions that have never existed. Sin, it self, is a person's own creation. A person does not sin until they choose selfishness over God's will. God did not create sin nor did Adam's fall create sin in every born baby. The reason why sin is a crime worthy of eternal punishment in hell is because each person is fully responsible for it.

God has many future contingencies based on what you do or do not do. Prayer can really change God's mind and plans. You can go to God and change His plans concerning you or your surroundings. Your future choices are not knowable because you have yet to create them. Your present decisions, thoughts, ideas, and actions are beginning to form your future. If you change them now, you change your future.

Some people believe that the past, present and future are ever present with God while others believe that God lives outside of time. These ideas are completely absurd. It is impossible for God to leave time as much as it is impossible for God to leave himself.

Other impossibilities

1. God can not create a rock so heavy that He can not throw it.

2. God cannot create another being like Himself. He is uncreated. God cannot create an uncreated being.

3. God cannot be in a place that does not exist.

4. God cannot cease being God.

5. God cannot think any thought that does not have a certain duration or interval. His mind is always active. He cannot stop thinking.

6. God cannot travel forward or backward in time. He cannot undo any past event or thought of any being including Himself. Once a sequence of events or thoughts takes place nothing can ever alter it.

Study questions

1. Explain the difference between God's natural and his creations.

2. Did God choose His natural attributes? Why?

3. Name some things that God cannot do.

4. What is time? When will time end?

5. Can God travel backward and forward in time?

6. What does the future depend on? Why?

7. Can God somehow escape time?

8. Where does a person's sin come from? Why?

9. Can God ever be held partly responsible for any beings sin? Why?

10. What law are animals under? Why?

11. Who is responsible for forming your future?

12. What are two kinds of law?

13. Is it possible for man to have true freedom and his future choices knowable?

14. What three truths must always comprise every creation or thought of God?


TOPICS: General Discusssion; Theology
KEYWORDS: god; thought; time
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2004 3:20:53 PM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill; P-Marlowe; Corin Stormhands; Alamo-Girl; Revelation 911; The Grammarian; ...
This is not especially well-written in my opinion (some grammar/spelling errors).

Also, I found myself reacting negatively AGAINST some of the ideas in here.

However, it is a contrarian view, and as such, it is worthy of discussion.

REad through it and mark those things that make you react. Priortize them. PUt up your numbers 1-3.
2 posted on 02/05/2004 3:23:56 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Sounds fairly open theistic to me. On the one hand, I've thought myself that perhaps time is a natural attribute of God; on the other hand, the writer makes many of these statements axiomatically (he states them as though they were axioms) and without any explanation. Ultimately, I am still up in the air. I cannot imagine eternity as 'outside of time' so much as 'age-during' (as the Young's Literal Translation translates "aionion") or ever-lasting--an everlasting succesion of events, if only because it would make heaven a blur. I think I agree with Joshua Harris' dad when he said that "God created time so that everything wouldn't happen at once."

The author also makes the logical leap that for God to foreknow an event before it happened would be for God to cause it, which I would dispute.

And last, he almost sounds like he's denying total depravity in one of those paragraphs ("God did not create sin nor did Adam's fall create sin in every born baby").

3 posted on 02/05/2004 3:47:25 PM PST by The Grammarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Very interesting. But I believe God is enternal he stand at the being of time and delcares the end of time. He also stand at the end of time and declare the being. And that time is a fuction of this universe, not eternity. And that God has created a new heaven(universe) and a new earth. And that this old heaven and earth will pass away, including all the natural laws, including time. God has no boundaries when it comes to creating. He is omni-present in all thing eternal and in this universe, past present and future at the same moment. We are finite and he is infinite, so it hard to understand it, and grasp it, but it is so never the less.
4 posted on 02/05/2004 4:13:45 PM PST by Warlord David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian
Yes. The first on my list is the one you picked -- his jump to the axiom that "time is an attribute of God." I would have welcomed scripture on that one.

5 posted on 02/05/2004 4:52:21 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Time is measured by change. God is unchanging. Ergo, God is beyond time.

Time is measured by change. Change pertains to the creation. Ergo, time pertains to the creation.

QED

6 posted on 02/05/2004 4:54:26 PM PST by Dajjal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Interesting. You asked for the order of things that strike me so here goes.

1. To say that time is a natural attribute of God is certainly something new to me. My understanding is and has been that God transcends time, therefore, since there is no where God is not, everywhere is not part of God. The same is true with time. This sounds very pantheistic to me.

2. The concept of time as being linear is a very modern concept. I'm not sure this will square with what we know about time in physics, which as I understand it seems to think time is curved. If it is curved, then in the sense of infinity, it must be circular, which takes us back to an understanding before the modern era. (I don't have a clue what I'm talking about!!!!!)

3. "His thoughts are really his own creation. God is part of an endless and continuous sequence of thoughts, ideas and actions. Once God thinks a thought it becomes forever embedded in the essence of time." Once again, this seems very pantheistic to me

7 posted on 02/05/2004 4:57:41 PM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Grammarian
Sounds fairly open theistic to me.

I would certainly agree that is one of its effects. Two specifics jumped out at me:

(1) That God knows all which is knowable; and

(2) That God acts (and thinks) "linearly" or sequentially.

Both of these concepts are key insights to the open theism view. The first causes the reader to focus upon the epistemological question of the limits of knowledge. The second takes us away from misleading questions of the 'measurement' of time to the more important sequential/linear question where some facts are dependent of other, earlier facts.

Your phrase ("...an everlasting succesion of events...") catches the concept well. Perhaps that is why the author posits (at least that aspect of) 'time' as a 'natural attribute' of God.

I do not think one can tell from what is said whether the author is an open theist, but he is at least conversant with the issues raised by open theism.

8 posted on 02/05/2004 5:12:11 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vernon
I goofed... I said, "... therefore, since there is no where God is not, everywhere is not part of God." What I tried to say was: Though there is no where God is not, and you can find God everywhere, this does not mean that God himself is the essense of everywhere itself. He inhabits eternity and is eternal, but is not eternity itself. This writer sounds very pantheistic to me.
9 posted on 02/05/2004 5:14:08 PM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
Is there a relationship between Open Theism and Pantheism? Seems to me like there are similarities.
10 posted on 02/05/2004 5:22:59 PM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I have not read the article, but maybe you could answer a question for me.

What is the purpose of discussing time as it relates to God? Doesn't the Bible start with "In the beginning" and isn't God eternal and "from everlasting to everlasting"? And isn't Jesus Christ the focal point of all of human history? This all seems so obvious to me that there really isn't much, if anything, to add that is worthwhile stating; or am I missing something?

11 posted on 02/05/2004 5:30:10 PM PST by connectthedots (Recognize that not all Calvinists will be Christians in glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vernon
Is there a relationship between Open Theism and Pantheism? Seems to me like there are similarities.

Not to my knowledge. Pantheism equates God with the laws and forces of the universe, in effect 'de-personalizing' God.

Open theism is a construct of biblical data which emphasizes the extent of 'knowability' of contingent events, particularly those where the contingency involves a free will decision of man.

12 posted on 02/05/2004 5:30:19 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill; The Grammarian
I agree with the 6 axiomatic statements at the beginning of the article. I agree that God cannot violate his own attributes.

I'll nod to this: The fact that God is an uncreated eternal being and has all power does not give Him any praise worthiness or value. A big mountain is worthy of comment just for it's beauty, but I get the author's point.

Then he makes the axiomatic statement that "time is a natural attribute of God."

I want scripture for that before I buy it, and I can't come up with any.

13 posted on 02/05/2004 5:34:47 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
What is the purpose of discussing time as it relates to God? Doesn't the Bible start with "In the beginning" and isn't God eternal and "from everlasting to everlasting"? And isn't Jesus Christ the focal point of all of human history? This all seems so obvious to me that there really isn't much, if anything, to add that is worthwhile stating; or am I missing something?

I concur in part and dissent in part. I concur that discussions of the 'measurement' or 'quantum' of time or differences in the relative perspective of such measurement between God and man is a waste. However, I think that the importance of the biblical account emphasizing the sequencing of God's thoughts has important consequences discussed elsewhere in this thread.

In summary, the very progression of 'time' as it applies to God is a very important distinction. If, contrary to the biblical account, God does not think and act sequentially (in that sense, within 'time'), then the determinist idea of a once-for-all-time instanteous script of 'history' makes more sense. If, to the contrary, He does think and act, sequentially, (and, IF the biblical account shows that God has chosen to respect decisions of His creatures), then the determinist model is problematic.

14 posted on 02/05/2004 5:44:09 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Who is the author or did I miss it?
15 posted on 02/05/2004 5:48:39 PM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
1. It's good to know all that God reveals seems axiomatic to me. So, if His word reveals things about time, then that information will help to understand something else somewhere else.

2. It's an integral piece of the "God's Foreknowledge" discussion.
16 posted on 02/05/2004 5:51:30 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Then he makes the axiomatic statement that "time is a natural attribute of God." I want scripture for that before I buy it, and I can't come up with any.

As I have indicated somewhat summarily here, I think the author foreshortens his argument in this way: (i)God acts and thinks sequentially as a 'natural attribute', (ii) the idea of sequentialization presupposes what we call 'time', (iii) therefore, what we call 'time' is a natural attribute of God. The major premise, I believe is amply demonstrated from biblical authority cited in the article, the minor primise is definitional.

I find that fairly strong. Our determinist friends probably won't 'come out to play' (because they see where this simple observation can lead) but I think even they would find it difficult to deny the sequentialization of God's thoughts and actions. [Of course, they could probably just label it an 'anthropomorphism' and move on with their preferred construct.]

17 posted on 02/05/2004 6:01:09 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
What does this do to the idea of foreknowledge?
18 posted on 02/05/2004 6:17:12 PM PST by Vernon (Sir "Ol Vern" aka Brother Maynard, a child of the King!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vernon
What does this do to the idea of foreknowledge?

Because, as the article suggests, "There is nothing knowable that He does not know," the question comes "What is unknowable?" The answer seems to be, only those future things which are contingent on matters not within His control. From the standpoint of open theists, the only things not within His control are (i)the free will decisions of His creatures (to which God has, in a self-limited way, agreed to respect) and (ii) matters which are generated by other free agents, i.e. Satan.

It is not unusual that open theists (like Boyd) give a large swath to Satan. This accounts for the presence and persistence of evil (both 'personal' and 'natural') without in any way seeing God as the source of it. [In fact, Boyd refers to his theology as a "Trinitarian warfare theodicy."]

Thus, in sum, to the extent that these future decisions are truly independent of God, they are not knowable until they are made (and thus become 'facts' capable of being known) and therefore cannot be known -- even by God. It is this attribution of evil to the free agency of Satan and man that partially limits God's foreknowledge within the open theist view.

It is "partial" because God, of course, knows His own actions and, even as to those things which He does not 'know' (because they don't yet exist), He would probably have probability estimates based upon present knowledge of the decision-makers.

So, you can see how important this matter of (i) the sequentiality of God and (ii) the free agency of Satan and man can be to foreknowledge in the open theist view.

19 posted on 02/05/2004 7:00:53 PM PST by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: winstonchurchill
Why does both idea of God thinking in time or eternal contradict each other? For the determinist idea for a once and for all time instanteous script of history in God thinking does not limit his ability to think and act sequentially either. Both ideas provide how unlimited Gods ability are.
20 posted on 02/05/2004 7:13:33 PM PST by Warlord David
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson