To: Scrutator
I do not wish to debate or argue your point, but the concept is that the sacrifice was sufficient to atone for everyones sins. For this to become fact you have to accept this atonement and obviously not everyone has taken advantage of this sacrifice.
5 posted on
01/29/2004 4:12:17 AM PST by
BipolarBob
(My time on FR counts toward my "hours of community service sentence" RIGHT???)
To: BipolarBob; Scrutator
"For this to become fact you have to accept this atonement and obviously not everyone has taken advantage of this sacrifice". Right. And Scrutator doesn't get it, because he or she hasn't *come* *freely* to Christ.
No one is forced to the Father. We do so freely.
He or she is free to be a non-believer. I am free to think differently. To believe differently. But I find it very interesting that Scrutator even came to this thread. Perhaps he or she is *searching*?
To: BipolarBob
Disagree. Universal atonement like you are defending is the ancient heresy of Pelaganism (sp).
94 posted on
02/01/2004 1:18:49 PM PST by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson