To: Catholicguy
Catholic prelates and monks had about 1400 years to gather, control, choose, comtemplate and rework biblical era tales before Guttenberg invented the printing press.
If we can't trust many of today's bishops, why should anyone trust those in earlier eras?
15 posted on
01/23/2004 6:51:02 AM PST by
thinktwice
(The human mind is blessed with reason, and to waste that blessed mind is treason.)
To: thinktwice
LOL Bishop Tacitus? Pope Pliny? Saint Tiberius?
20 posted on
01/23/2004 6:55:59 AM PST by
Catholicguy
(MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
To: thinktwice
Catholic prelates and monks had about 1400 years to gather, control, choose, comtemplate and rework biblical era tales before Guttenberg invented the printing press. Up until the point of collating the disparate stories into one Bible, I'll give you the vagaries of mistranslation, reinterpretation, misattribution and plain insertion of stuff people thought should be there. But afterwards, the monk scribes were EXTREMELY careful about getting every word right, often taking one year to transcribe one copy, with thorough reviews including word and letter counts in addition to proofreading.
To: thinktwice
The why no forgeries of offical Roman accounts of the Resurrection?
77 posted on
01/23/2004 10:00:26 AM PST by
RobbyS
(XPqu)
To: thinktwice
If we can't trust many of today's bishops, why should anyone trust those in earlier eras?
This statement is a logical fallacy. It's the equivalent of saying: "I heard an Irishman lie, so therefore, I don't trust Irishmen anymore."
129 posted on
01/25/2004 10:48:57 AM PST by
Antoninus
(In hoc signo, vinces †)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson