Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 01/26/2004 9:33:25 AM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:

This thread is now locked. It has served its purpose. thank you all for your participation and patience.



Skip to comments.

GOOD NEWS - BAD NEWS (Don't Say You Weren't Warned)
Self | 1-22-04 | Sidebar Moderator

Posted on 01/22/2004 6:34:29 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator

GOOD NEWS - BAD NEWS

(Don't Say You Weren't Warned)

The bad news is that I am the newly designated moderator of Free Republic's Religion Forum. The good news is that I am the newly designated moderator of Free Republic's Religion Forum.

First, let's discuss why this is bad news.

I have no doubt that everyone who participates in this forum is aware of the general posting guidelines of Free Republic; they've been in effect as long as Free Republic has been in existence. Just for clarity, here they are again: "NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts."

Having spent the better part of a week reading as much as I was able to get to on the Religion Forum, which includes virtually every currently posted thread, I can say that I've seen no profanity (should be a given on a forum devoted to religion), and only one or two posts which could be construed to contain violence. On that score I commend you all.

Unfortunately, however, personal attacks are rampant. Protestants attack Catholics, and vice versa. Within these two major Christian families, Calvinists attack Arminians, and tit-for-tat. Traditional Catholics attack New Age Catholics, and back it comes. Self-professed Christians of all flavors post gratuitous insults and jibes directed toward Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses frequently. Threads are posted for the obvious and sole purpose of flaming "the opposition", whoever that might be in any particular instance. I could go on and on with further examples, but from many of your posted comments it is clear that all of you are aware of these facts, and seemingly, accept them as the order of things.

It is not the order of things, and it will no longer be tolerated.

Sadly, a forum devoted to perhaps the highest endeavor of the human mind and soul, that of the religious expression of faith, has become an embarrassment to Free Republic. All too often the discourse appearing in the Religion Forum resembles that found in those threads devoted to the War on Drugs, less the profanity, of course. Consequently, the question whether the Religion Forum will remain much longer as a feature of Free Republic, at least in its present format, is very much up in the air. How that question is answered depends entirely on the response each and every one of you make to this announcement in the next few weeks.

Therefore, from this time forward, the Free Republic rule of " NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts.", will be more strictly enforced. Furthermore, you are all reminded that this is a religion forum; that is, all practitioners of any recognized religion, provided they also follow the rules, are welcome. However, since a large majority of posters to this forum are self-professing Christians, of one flavor or another, some additional rules will be imposed. You should all be quite familiar with them, even though some of you seem to pay them no heed at present.

These rules are:

"The second is this, 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself'." [Mark 12:31 (RSV)]

"But I say to you that hear, love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who abuse you." [Luke 6:27 (RSV)]

"A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another; even as I have loved you, that you also love one another." [John 13:34 (RSV)]

"If you love me, you will keep my commandments." [John 14:15 (RSV)]

Or, if the commandments of our Lord Jesus are insufficient (paraphrasing Paul) speak the truth in love.

For now, enough of the harsh words. There really is good news.

First and foremost, all that has passed prior to today is forgiven. However, my forgiveness, unlike that of God, is continuing but not unlimited. After all, I'm a sinner, too. Transgressions of the rules will be met with three warnings, followed by three progressively lengthy suspensions, after which unrepentant posters will be, shall we say, cast into the outer darkness. Totally outrageous violations, of course, remain subject to the ultimate penalty immediately, as always.

However, I am also aware that love, in the Biblical sense, is not the Hollywood kind of love we hear about all around us these days. Spirited debate is a hallmark of Free Republic, and is welcome. Sometimes the truth (at least as we understand it, through a glass darkly) sounds rather harsh, but even harsh truth can be couched in terms that allow the Christian love of the speaker to come through.

Further, no matter how you read the tenor of this announcement, I am not a martinet. I can be persuaded to change my mind by reasoned discourse. On the other hand, sinful nature that I have, I do not suffer fools gladly. Directing complaints to me over some action I have taken is fine; doing so with insulting language will not achieve the results you desire, and in fact, will probably result in something far worse. And, as always, I am not the ultimate authority regarding any decision I make; anything I do can be appealed to one higher court - Jim Robinson, by whose direction I am here as moderator.

There are some things I will not do. I will not arbitrate theological disputes. I will not resolve questions of church polity. Nor will I render judgment on interpretations of Scripture. Those are all issues for legitimate debate, and I do not propose to take part as just another poster on this forum. Naturally, I have my own opinions on all these issues, but my opinions are my own and I will keep them to myself.

You should also know, I suppose, that I was selected as the moderator of the Religion Forum because no one else wanted to wade into the mess that this forum has become. All too often when abuse reports come into the moderators from the Religion Forum it is discovered that there are no clean hands in the dispute under complaint. More often than not removing the post complained about generates another abuse report asking "why was I punished when he said thus-and-so first". In many cases, removing all of the offending posts makes the thread unreadable. So, whatever you think of me now, or come to think of me in the next few weeks, I'm your last chance. After me comes the abyss.

And do yourself a favor; before you respond to this announcement remember the immortal advice of Jim Croce:

'You don't tug on Superman's cape
You don't spit into the wind
You don't pull the mask off the old Lone Ranger
And you don't mess around with Jim'

I'm not Jim, but I've got his ear.

One final word. I am not here 24/7. I actually have a life away from Free Republic; consequently your questions/complaints/comments may not be answered immediately. Be patient, they will be answered eventually. In the end, my goal is (our goal should be) that there will come the day when my presence here is unnoticed. That should be attainable if we all act like the Christian brothers and sisters we claim to be.

May God bless you all.


TOPICS: Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Eastern Religions; Evangelical Christian; Islam; Judaism; Mainline Protestant; Orthodox Christian; Other Christian; Other non-Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology
KEYWORDS: adminlectureseries; catholiclist; fr; ick; law; lexicon; sidebarpastor; zionist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,001-1,003 next last
To: Alex Murphy
I have my own personal list. :)

Once the new mod gets to know the players, I don't think it will be too hard for him.

BigMack
321 posted on 01/23/2004 10:01:28 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Love you too Mom.

I guess we have been thru the "hurt and the pain" together and have come out the stronger for it, who would of thunk it. :)

BigMack

322 posted on 01/23/2004 10:03:47 AM PST by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Is there any point at which this "fervor" becomes something that is contrary to the teachings of Christianity?

Depends what proof texts you want to use. :>)

323 posted on 01/23/2004 10:06:10 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
I'll jump at that opening.

Yes, without question, there is a point at which this "fervor" becomes something that is contrary to the teachings of Christianity.

It is also my opinion that there is another point at which this "fervor" becomes something that is contrary to what we want in our forums.

324 posted on 01/23/2004 10:09:20 AM PST by Lead Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Lead Moderator; xzins; drstevej; Corin Stormhands; P-Marlowe; connectthedots; Vernon
My peer is not around right now, so I will jump in with an answer to your query: "I would question limited participation threads"

If you are talking about threads "For Catholics Only" or "For Protestants Only" or the like, I pull those when I see them. Thanks, LM

Clearer - that being the case will calvin "g.r.p.l. only" threads be allowed to stand

whats developing is that those threads typically end up in the SBR, new threads spawn with the same title in the relig forum. Those in disagreement or divergent opinion are lead to the SBR thread

325 posted on 01/23/2004 10:17:16 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I agree Rev .

thats twice - yikes - who's the heretic now LOL - cats and dogs getting along - the rapture is at hand

326 posted on 01/23/2004 10:22:29 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
my 325 is not to be a yutz - rather I think some claification is in order - past mods have been too silent and we have poor mindreading skills (again with the black arts legalisms)so I dont try
327 posted on 01/23/2004 10:24:29 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
plus in thinking about it Ive changed my mind- dedicated threads would be cool - each dog gets its own house IMO
328 posted on 01/23/2004 10:26:45 AM PST by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator
Dear Sir:

I only just read this post. Catholics that are faithful to the Holy See and the teaching of the Church are not "New Age Catholics". This is a slur and I think you owe us an apology for use of this term.
329 posted on 01/23/2004 10:29:50 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuffington
As long as we don't have to tolerate the Judean People's Front!

What ever happened to the Popular Peoples Front?

330 posted on 01/23/2004 10:34:51 AM PST by conservonator (To be Catholic is to enjoy the fullness of Christian faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: polemikos
4 - My tagline ascribes a bad result to a foundational aspect of Protestant theology. I believe it is fully, factually, and truthfully supportable. Is it offensive? Some would probably say yes. But is it an offense?

Enquiring minds want to know.


299 posted on 01/23/2004 11:50:01 AM EST by polemikos (Sola Scriptura creats hereosis)



Your tag line is offensive as it mock Protestants and call then heretics .

Now in the past I would have looked and smiled and ignored..but no more ..who tight will the rules be? Well if they are tight you get a warning
331 posted on 01/23/2004 10:35:58 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Have you tried the organic sulfite free wines? I have found them to be quite good. No headaches, no stuffy nose.
332 posted on 01/23/2004 10:39:39 AM PST by k omalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: k omalley
No, I haven't, but my problem is not headaches, it's suddenly swollen and itchy mouth. This happens with certain strains of grapes, too.
333 posted on 01/23/2004 10:48:23 AM PST by Desdemona (Kempis' Imitation of Christ online! http://www.leaderu.com/cyber/books/imitation/imitation.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: All
Sidebar Moderator's #222: Rest assured, eliminating the Religion Forum is the last resort, only to be done if everyone refuses to cooperate.

There are many cooperative people posting here. Their voices tend to be drowned out, some driven away, some dragged into heated debate by the accusers, flamers, bashers, brawlers, etc., so that the perception is that nearly all engage in personal attacks and brawling.

But now, as I understand it, the flamers and brawlers who do not heed the warnings will get progressively longer timeouts until they lose the posting privilege entirely.

Then, and only then, some of the cooperative people who have been driven away will start coming back -- joining those who post well when not repeatedly provoked -- to enjoy an energetic and vigorous but also peaceful and constructive airing of views and differences in which those who are Christians (and those who are not) post in a Christlike and Godly manner and the moderators have nothing to do.

So the last resort need never be, so long as the brawlers who just won't cooperate are not permitted to spoil it for the rest of us.

Let's see what happens to this forum when the brawlers who just won't cooperate are no longer here to stir things up, fan the flames, whatever metaphor seems best.

334 posted on 01/23/2004 10:51:00 AM PST by White Mountain (By their fruits ye shall know them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Well, at least they're not selling strawberry Riuniti.

And your point is?

:-)

Strawberry Riunite enhances my very Southern redneck existence (and wages war with my *very* Eye-talian roots - LOL!)

335 posted on 01/23/2004 10:56:41 AM PST by dansangel (*PROUD to be a knuckle-dragging, toothless, inbred, right-wing, Southern, gun-toting Neanderthal *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
No absolutely not. I was just responding to the number of your post. I meant nothing about you at all. I'm sorry if you thought that.
336 posted on 01/23/2004 10:57:32 AM PST by Markofhumanfeet (That's fair. I'm quoting some of the bible all of the time,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain; Sidebar Moderator
"...I got rid of the few that were causing the problems and the rest now seemed like saints. A very easy solution to a problem that seemed all encompassing."

Mack has made some excellent points. Are the "Abuse" button abusers a large part of the problem? If so, out with them!

There are some circumstances where it is not possible, or not acceptable, to be perfectly and honestly blunt with someone. This forum provides that avenue providing this bluntness doesn't become abuse.

All in all, I think the policy is reasonable. The proof of the pudding will be seen soon enough.

337 posted on 01/23/2004 11:03:53 AM PST by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
How do you suggest deciding which handful to get rid of? Do we dump the heretics (for causing problems by advocating doctrinal heresies), or do we dump the orthodox (for causing problems by being judgemental concerning heresies)?

None of the above. Dump the Abuse button abusers!
338 posted on 01/23/2004 11:10:03 AM PST by OLD REGGIE ((I am a cult of one! UNITARJEWMIAN) Maybe a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
None of the above. Dump the Abuse button abusers!

Better yet just dump the abuse button. This is the internet for crying out loud. Too much thin skin around here.

339 posted on 01/23/2004 11:13:37 AM PST by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: White Mountain
white, most of your problems is that you see tough questions as abuse. You will have to move your position, or I forsee you personally acting like a moderator here and asking for people to be banned.

IMO a constant crier is as bad as a "hostile" poster.
340 posted on 01/23/2004 11:17:16 AM PST by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 1,001-1,003 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson