Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New document on liturgy to appear soon
Catholic World News ^ | 1/7/04 | Catholic World News

Posted on 01/07/2004 1:16:33 PM PST by lrslattery

Catholic World News (cwnews.com) has reported that the long-awaited document on the liturgy that the Holy Father called for in his encyclical Ecclesia de Eucharistia, will soon be made public. It seems to have been delayed by high-level disagreements within the Vatican. It is also reported that the document will not contain any striking innovations.

In Ecclesia de Eucharistia, Pope John Paul had said that the new document would provide juridical norms regarding the celebration of the Eucharist. The purpose of the document, Vatican officials disclosed at the time, was to curtail liturgical abuse-- a problem that was viewed by the Holy See with grave concern.

CWN reports that the editors of the document-- which has been prepared primarly by the Congregation for Divine Worship-- were reportedly under heavy pressure to avoid causing controversy by taking positions that would be judged as extreme. The final document will avoid that danger by confining itself to a repetition of previous Vatican statements and standards. In effect, informed sources report, the new document will be a distilled version of the liturgical norms already published in the General Instructions for the Roman Missal.


(Excerpt) Read more at cwnews.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Religion & Culture; Worship
KEYWORDS: liturgy; norms; pope
So if CWN sources are correct, we are going to get yet under toothless document without the 'prescriptions of a juridical nature' which the Holy Father requested. No 'rigid' rules for us, please! We do so love our our warm, fuzzy liturgies with dancing, bongos & drums, clapping, with electified guitars and such....It's just so, Matthew Fox - you know what I'm talking about - his Cosmic Techo Mass!

If this report is true, and I certainly don't want to prejudge the document itself, many will be greatly disappointed. There are enough documents already that clarify the rules and far too many priests ignore them and some bishops are too weak to correct them.

I guess we will have to wait and see. (slatts.blogspot.com)

1 posted on 01/07/2004 1:16:33 PM PST by lrslattery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lrslattery
So if CWN sources are correct, we are going to get yet another toothless document without the 'prescriptions of a juridical nature' which the Holy Father requested.
2 posted on 01/07/2004 1:19:34 PM PST by lrslattery (Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam - http://slatts.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lrslattery
Consider the history of the Ten Articles of Henry VIII: Where a document is ambiguous, the result can go in either direction, depending on who is running the show. The Articles were a mix of conservative and reforming propositions, but the reformers usually carried the day because Cromwell and Cranmer dominated the implication of the Articles. They made every resistance to their instructions to be a resistance to the royal supremacy. So even though Henry himself preferred traditional practices, he almost always allowed a move in a reformed direction. Only the Real Presence was a doctrine that the Reformers dared not touch.
3 posted on 01/07/2004 1:52:50 PM PST by RobbyS (XPqu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lrslattery
**The purpose of the document, Vatican officials disclosed at the time, was to curtail liturgical abuse-- a problem that was viewed by the Holy See with grave concern.**

This will be good. Looking forward to it.
4 posted on 01/07/2004 1:54:55 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Usually when authorities speak of "abuse" they mean practices that depart from fundamental principles. We will see if they move against priests who are informal heretics.
5 posted on 01/07/2004 2:12:22 PM PST by RobbyS (XPqu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson