Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bible’s Lost Stories (Newsweek explores "da Vinci Code" fiction as fact)
Newsweek ^ | Dec. 8 issue | Barbara Kantrowitz and Anne Underwood

Posted on 12/03/2003 11:03:20 AM PST by presidio9

The year’s surprise “it” girl is the star of a mega best seller, a hot topic on campuses and rumored to be the “special friend” of a famous and powerful man. Yet she’s still very much a woman of mystery. For close to 2,000 years, Christians have known her as Mary Magdalene, but she was probably named Miriam, and came from the fishing village of Magdala. Most people today grew up believing she was a harlot saved by Jesus. But the Bible never says that. Scholars working with ancient texts now believe she was one of Christ’s most devoted followers, perhaps even his trusted confidante and financial backer.

THIS REVISIONIST VIEW helped inspire the plot of “The Da Vinci Code,” which has been on The New York Times best-seller list for 36 weeks, with 4.3 million copies in print. Author Dan Brown draws on some credible discoveries about the first followers of Jesus as well as some rather fantastical theories about Mary Magdalene to suggest that she was far more than the first to witness the risen Jesus (her most important role, according to the New Testament). The blockbuster novel has enraged many theologians who consider it anti-Catholic, but it has also added new force to an already dynamic debate among women who see Magdalene’s story as a parable for their own struggles to find a place in the modern church. None of this would be possible without a new generation of women Biblical scholars who have brought a very modern passion to the ancient tradition of scriptural reinterpretation—to correct what these scholars regard as a male misreading of key texts. It has not been easy work. Despite the undeniably central role of Mary, the mother of Jesus, the Biblical focus has largely been on what God has accomplished through the agency of men—from Adam to the Apostles. Of some 3,000 characters named in the Bible, fewer than 10 percent are women. Female scholars are trying to redress the imbalance by unearthing narratives that have been overlooked for centuries and reinterpreting more-familiar stories, including Mary Magdalene’s and even the story of Eve (where, one could argue, the problems really began). And they are rigorously studying the Biblical period to glean what they can about the role of women in ancient times.

Across the country, fresh research is inspiring women of all faiths. Evangelical Protestant women hold their own Bible-study groups where the distaff version of history is a major draw. Jewish worshipers now add to the litany of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob the names of their wives: Sarah, Rebekah and Rachel. In addition to Moses at Passover, some celebrate his sister, Miriam, who defied a powerful and tyrannical ruler to rescue her baby brother from a death decree and became a prophet and leader in her own right. For Roman Catholics in particular, Mary Magdalene has emerged as a role model for women who want a greater church presence after the wave of sexual-abuse scandals. “I want my daughter to feel that she is as equally valued as her brother in terms of her faith,” says Dr. Jo Kelly, 38, of Sinking Spring, Pa. Not long ago, Kelly’s daughter, Mary Shea, 7, told her mother she wanted to be a priest. Kelly, a pediatrician who belongs to a religious-discussion group, didn’t discourage her. “Keep believing that,” she replied, “and maybe we can change people’s minds.”

Mary Magdalene inspires, these women say, because she was not a weakling—the weeping Magdalene whose name begat the English word “maudlin” —but a person of strength and character. In an era when women were commonly identified in relation to a husband, father or brother, she was identified instead by her town of origin. Scholars believe she was one of a number of women who provided monetary support for Jesus’ ministry. And when the male disciples fled, she steadfastly witnessed Jesus’ crucifixion, burial and resurrection, providing the thread of continuity in the central story of Christian history—an extraordinary role in an age when women generally provided legal testimony only in the absence of male witnesses. Tradition, however, has consigned Mary to a lesser role. “Instead, we’ve been given the image of Mary as a forgiven sinner,” says Sister Christine Schenk, cofounder of FutureChurch, an organization calling for women’s equality in the Roman Catholic Church. “Well, Peter was a forgiven sinner, too, but that’s not what we remember him for.” Schenk helped institute nationwide observances of Mary Magdalene’s feast day, July 22.

To honor their heroine, Catholic women like Kathy Kidder and her friends in Gainesville, Fla., are forming reading groups to discuss the dozens of new scholarly and literary books about her and debating her role on religious Web sites like Magdalene.org and Beliefnet.com. The new insights they gain can shatter old beliefs, but often also help them deepen their faith. College student Frances Garcia, 26, of Orlando, Fla., was raised Catholic, but now attends a Baptist church. “The Da Vinci Code” raised troubling questions for her about how women’s contributions to early Christianity were suppressed by church leaders. “My faith was really shaken,” she says. “I started doing a lot of research on my own.” Learning more made her feel “closer to God,” she says.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: marymagdalene; newsweek; prioryofsion; thedavincicode
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

1 posted on 12/03/2003 11:03:20 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I'm totally out of the loop on this. I avoided the show on ABC because it was on ABC and the fact that the media loves it seems like a tip-off that its demonic to me. What are churches saying about it?
2 posted on 12/03/2003 11:06:45 AM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Along with their coverage of the President's trip to Iraq, I scanned this blathering piece of tripe last night at the mother-in-law's house.

More and more, Newsweek looks to be the most liberal of all the newsweeklies. And, given Time's bent, that's no small feat.

3 posted on 12/03/2003 11:07:47 AM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
What are churches saying about it?

That'll depend on which "church" you ask, and what they think of the Bible.

4 posted on 12/03/2003 11:11:30 AM PST by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible, i.e. words mean things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
New Lows in Hollywood Attack on Christianity

Posted Oct 31, 2003 - 11:52 AM
http://www.gohotsprings.com/focus/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=658

ABC's Elizabeth Vargas said Jesus, Mary and Da Vinci, to be shown in the US on Monday night, was being made "as respectfully as we can".

But she admitted: "You can't talk about this subject without intriguing people or offending people."

The programme is partly based on the best-selling novel The Da Vinci Code.
5 posted on 12/03/2003 11:12:24 AM PST by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
What are churches saying about it?

Nothing, because it is irrelevant fiction, exciting to feminists and others with a political grudge against the Catholic Church. The explore these fantasies for historical basis (which is patently impossible when historians can not even agree that there was a person named Jesus living in Nazareth in 30 AD) hoping this will somehow discredit Catholicism. The thing non-Catholics depenably get wrong about Catholicism is Mary's role in our religion. We do not think that she is Divine, and she has nothing to do with priestly celibacy.

6 posted on 12/03/2003 11:13:21 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Naspino
What are churches saying about it?

It's got a nice beat and it's easy to dance to.
8 posted on 12/03/2003 11:16:37 AM PST by dsmatuska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsmatuska
It's got a nice beat and it's easy to dance to.

All kidding aside, I, for one, would be very interested to hear the Greek Orthodox take on this nonsense.

9 posted on 12/03/2003 11:18:50 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What's next? "Queer Eye for the Straight Messiah"?


10 posted on 12/03/2003 11:26:01 AM PST by Fintan (Story of my life...3 guys, 2 girls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Speaking as a non-Catholic and someone who has absolutely NOTHING against the Catholic Church...the Da Vinci Code is a well-written, exciting piece of FICTION
11 posted on 12/03/2003 11:28:53 AM PST by TheBigB (Pick-up line made famous by James T. Kirk: "Wanna see the Captain's Log?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
As far as Whodunits, or in this case Whydunits are concerned, The DaVinci Code is middling fare that will perhaps translate to the big screen fairly well. Whereas I can't imagine "Foucalt's Pendulum" (speaking of secret societies) being turned into anything other than a shapeless mess by hollywood.

The main points in the book have been explored ad nauseum by a host of historians and idea that Mary Magedlene represents the Sang Real deserves an honest look.

12 posted on 12/03/2003 11:29:21 AM PST by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
Sang Real?
13 posted on 12/03/2003 11:31:14 AM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
There is lots of revisionist to the history of Mary Magdalene. Some women theologians attempt to claim male chauvinist pigs church fathers, including St Paul. Some woman theologian on PBS was actually saying the bible according to John was actually written by Mary Magdalene?

The Jewish Hebrew tradition in treating women in that era as second class citizens is always cited? The reality is NO ONE REALY KNOWS! Feminist can try to get credit for the bible. The next time the fags want to take credit for Jesus (since he did not get married?). The Blacks have already shown that Jesus was black? It is so wonderful for the Christians to allow, and to tolerate this kind of discussions. A Moslem would have been killed for attempting one single word outside the old traditional beliefs.

14 posted on 12/03/2003 11:32:51 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
Brown is an entertaining storyteller, but he goes too far when he tries to justify the veracity of his theory in the preface. The book is pure fiction.
15 posted on 12/03/2003 11:33:16 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
The Da Vinci code is a scam, and the agenda of the people involved is quite evident.

Ops4 God Bless America!
16 posted on 12/03/2003 11:34:45 AM PST by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
Yep, I flipped through the Da Vinci code in a bookstore once and thought the writing style was pretty stale and childish and "bad writing contest"-esque. (Not nearly as bad as the time I flipped through one of the "Left Behind" books...I'm not sure if my mind has recovered from the horror yet.)

"Foucault's Pendulum" was great. I can't see a movie ever being made of it, unless the ending and point of the book were totally changed from Eco's. People would be too dissastified.
17 posted on 12/03/2003 11:34:52 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Holy Grail = San Greal = Sang Real = Royal Blood Line of David
18 posted on 12/03/2003 11:36:10 AM PST by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
The main points in the book have been explored ad nauseum by a host of historians and idea that Mary Magedlene represents the Sang Real deserves an honest look.

Not sure what exactly you were trying to say here. But if you were sayin that the Sang Real anagram deserves an honest look, all I can say is "starting with what?" Incomplete 2000 year-old non-accredited manuscripts? Again, when historians can't agree that Jesus really existed, there is no point in trying to determine the lifestyle of Mary Magedlene.

19 posted on 12/03/2003 11:40:16 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jim Cane
Holy Grail = San Greal = Sang Real = Royal Blood Line of David

Warning: Spoiler - only for those who have read the book. Its a good whodunit book.

The Holy Grail is the remains of Mary Magdalene, wife of Jesus, and who was of noble blood herself - according to some and heralded in the Da Vinci Code she is also the mother of Jesus' offspring - who are in turn of Royal Blood.

It became important for the newly emerging Church to make a deity of Jesus so they stripped away all references to his human existance and standard Jewish tradition of taking a wife.

The Holy Grail may indeed be something other than the chalice that the apostles drank from at the last supper. It may be proof of Jesus' love for Mary, her importance in the initial spread of The Word, and his kids. Wild.

20 posted on 12/03/2003 11:42:31 AM PST by corkoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson