Skip to comments.
Federal suit targets Greenpeace for members' actions
Experts say conviction may dampen dissent
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| October 11, 2003
| Adam Liptak
Posted on 10/12/2003 2:54:21 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:44:21 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Three miles off the Florida coast in April 2002, two Greenpeace activists clambered from an inflatable rubber speedboat onto a cargo ship. They were detained before they could unfurl a banner, spent the weekend in custody and two months later were sentenced to time served for boarding the ship without permission.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: civildisobedience; doj; ecoterror; ecoterrorism; environment; environmentalism; greenpeace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: All
To: All
 |
Keep Our Republic Free
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com |
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson! IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR THANKS! |
3
posted on
10/12/2003 2:57:24 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Greenpeace and the Sierra Club are both terrorist organizations.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Obviously, Greenpeace doesn't understand the root of "civil disobedience"---i.e. the willingness to TAKE THE CONSEQUENCES for having violated the law. Such organizations have, in the past, gotten a "free ride" for such unlawful activities.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
If you can't do the time, don't do the crime.
6
posted on
10/12/2003 4:14:20 AM PDT
by
JoeGar
To: Cincinatus' Wife
My understanding is that Greenpeace is already being investigated for using contributions to fund these activities from tax-exempt sources illegally. And not just a little. A lot.
Wish I had the link handy. I'll dig a bit and will post if I find it.
Qwinn
7
posted on
10/12/2003 4:14:34 AM PDT
by
Qwinn
To: farmfriend; sauropod; madfly
ping
To: Cincinatus' Wife
"Never before has our government criminally prosecuted an entire organization for the free speech activities of its supporters," said John Passacantando, the executive director of Greenpeace in the United States. Hmmm. I seem to have the expurgated version of the Constitution -- the one that doesn't include any clause protecting a right to commit criminal trespass. Maybe I should ask Greenpeace if they can provide me a copy of the full, unedited version.
9
posted on
10/12/2003 5:17:43 AM PDT
by
Brandon
To: Qwinn; Brandon
Bump!
To: Highest Authority; Wonder Warthog; JoeGar
Bump!
To: Qwinn
Check
Google out with "greenpeace tax violations", and you will come up with an ocean of info!
12
posted on
10/12/2003 5:44:59 AM PDT
by
BullDog108
(KNOW YOUR ENEMY! http://bvml.org/webmaster/enemy.html)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
The group is charged with violating an obscure 1872 law With a little digging into the moeny trail, I bet RICO would apply to these folks.
13
posted on
10/12/2003 5:48:57 AM PDT
by
Tijeras_Slim
(There's two kinds of people in the world. Those with loaded guns and those that dig.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
The black civil rights organization Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) has charged Greenpeace with being racist and keeping Africa poor, sick and underdeveloped.
COREs spokesman, Niger Innis, blasted Greenpeace for being a powerful elite of First World activists whose hardcore agenda puts people last. Greenpeace has been at the head of campaigns to ban the use of the insecticide DDT to fight mosquito-borne malaria. Malaria kills 2 million people each year in Africa and Asia, mostly women and children.
14
posted on
10/12/2003 6:15:58 AM PDT
by
sergeantdave
(You will be judged by 12 people who were too stupid to get out of jury duty)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Curiously enough, none of these people objected when the Federal Government started using RICO statutes against anti-abortion organizations, even though their "illegal acts" (things like kneeling on public sidewalks and hence allegedly having a negative impact on abortion clinic business) were considerably less damaging and hazardous than the Greenpeace stunts.
15
posted on
10/12/2003 6:49:36 AM PDT
by
livius
To: Cincinatus' Wife
In court papers, the organization's lawyers warned that the prosecution "could significantly affect our nation's tradition of civil protest and civil disobedience, a tradition that has endured from the Boston Tea Party through the modern civil rights movement. Civil protest becomes criminal when trespass occurs.
The Boston Tea Party was revolutionary criminal trespass; and so it is with the boarding of ships at sea by Greenpeace.
When Greenpeace wins in revolution against America, they too will become good guys.
To: livius
A more apt comparison for this action against Greenpeace would be to the confiscation of the Aryan Nations Compound (in Idaho?) a few years ago. Both were organized criminal enterprises.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
It would seem to fall under laws against piracy on the high seas.
They should have been made to walk the plank--and we should have had a half-dozen SEALs sink the Rainbow Warrior just for the pure heck of it.
Can't let the Frenchies look better than us.
--Boris
18
posted on
10/12/2003 7:51:14 AM PDT
by
boris
(The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I love the way these people twist words and law to make it look like it is only applying to one group and because of this, everyone would be punished. It sounds good in theory and some of it may be true; however, we all know that usually it's not that one group, Greenpeace in this case, that will be punished.
As Hitlery is fond of spouting "It's the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy." It anything, it's propoganda.
To: thinktwice
So then by their acts, Greenpeace is a "revolutionary" organization, committing crimes against the American government. They probably also like to think they are revolting against "King George", just like our founding fathers did. What a joke.
20
posted on
10/12/2003 8:08:34 AM PDT
by
Bob Mc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson