Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Statement on Prescription Pain Medication Stories
PRNewswire (Yahoo) ^ | Friday October 10, 2:55 pm ET | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 10/10/2003 12:17:21 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow

Press Release

Source: Premiere Radio

Rush Limbaugh Statement on Prescription Pain Medication Stories
Friday October 10, 2:55 pm ET

NEW YORK, Oct. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Rush Limbaugh today issued the following statement on his radio program:

"You know I have always tried to be honest with you and open about my life. So I need to tell you today that part of what you have heard and read is correct. I am addicted to prescription pain medication.

"I first started taking prescription painkillers some years ago when my doctor prescribed them to treat post surgical pain following spinal surgery. Unfortunately, the surgery was unsuccessful and I continued to have severe pain in my lower back and also in my neck due to herniated discs. I am still experiencing that pain. Rather than opt for additional surgery for these conditions, I chose to treat the pain with prescribed medication. This medication turned out to be highly addictive.

"Over the past several years I have tried to break my dependence on pain pills and, in fact, twice checked myself into medical facilities in an attempt to do so. I have recently agreed with my physician about the next steps.

"Immediately following this broadcast, I am checking myself into a treatment center for the next 30 days to once and for all break the hold this highly addictive medication has on me. The show will continue during this time, of course, with an array of guest hosts you have come to know and respect.

"I am not making any excuses. You know, over the years athletes and celebrities have emerged from treatment centers to great fanfare and praise for conquering great demons. They are said to be great role models and examples for others. Well, I am no role model. I refuse to let anyone think I am doing something great here, when there are people you never hear about, who face long odds and never resort to such escapes. They are the role models. I am no victim and do not portray myself as such. I take full responsibility for my problem.

"At the present time, the authorities are conducting an investigation, and I have been asked to limit my public comments until this investigation is complete. So I will only say that the stories you have read and heard contain inaccuracies and distortions, which I will clear up when I am free to speak about them.

"I deeply appreciate all your support over this last tumultuous week. It has sustained me. I ask now for your prayers. I look forward to resuming our excursion into broadcast excellence together."

For audio/video clip(s) of Rush Limbaugh's on-air statement, please go to

www.rushlimbaugh.com and/or www.premieretalk.com.



Source: Premiere Radio


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; eib; limbaugh; maharushie; rush; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 561-569 next last
To: sinkspur
Sinky, you've got a good nose for hypocrisy. Use it.

I never said I wasn't praying for Rush or anything else, just that this is unbeleiveably stupid, like his comment about our Eagles QB.
321 posted on 10/10/2003 1:39:30 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker (Go Eagles! Beat Dallas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: gdani
1995?

Do you have any more recent quotes?
322 posted on 10/10/2003 1:40:30 PM PDT by k2blader (Haruspex, beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
What an idiot... you lecture Rush?

I'm sorry, did I miss his deification?

Can't you see what a collossal blunder this is for him? Or did you miss all his lectures about drug use on his radio show?

323 posted on 10/10/2003 1:40:42 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: All
Is there at all any difference between the "street" drug addict who initially uses narcotics solely to get high and the addict who was prescribed the drug for a medical condition and subsequently gets hooked.

Seems to me there is.

Additionally, the guy apparently tried twice (on his own dime) to beat this thing, so it's not as if the "outing" by the NE has "forced" him to deal with it.

Let the DU'ers gloat. When the sun comes up tomorrow most of them will still be dependent on the productive class for their subsistence and will resume their lives of sniping at their superiors. ;)

324 posted on 10/10/2003 1:41:04 PM PDT by Mr. Buzzcut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: MamaB
Thank you. I'm glad he isn't suffering anymore.
325 posted on 10/10/2003 1:41:20 PM PDT by Auntbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
This harshness mirrors your belief that infants can not go to heaven.

I won't say "can't", but will say "not revealed" and "fruitless speculation".

326 posted on 10/10/2003 1:41:24 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: gdani
Rush is using pain medications for a very specific medical purpose, he isn't abusing drugs for 'recreational' purposes. He also is not engaging in various criminal activites to obtain his needed medication. He is also not running around in a 'high' state and out of control. There is no indication that Rush is obtaining addictive medications under false pretenses and then selling the same on the street where the 'recreational' drug abusers will use them and then commit various crimes to keep their supply going.

All indications are that Rush is using the medication for a valid medical condition and is suffering from the results of using that same medication.

There are several medications that are not suppported or 'approved' by the medical 'authorities' and therefore are not 'legally' or 'readily' available in the U.S. even though they are legally available elsewhere. Also, some medications are provided for by some insurance policies and not by others. Furthermore, some doctors or hospitals will prescribe some medications, but other hospitals or doctors will not prescribe those same medications.

I see nothing wrong with a person going outside of the 'system' to obtain critically necessary medications when they are not provided due to 'insurance' or other excessive restraints.

If Rush was terminally ill, he would have no problem legally obtaining the same medications that he is now having trouble obtaining due to someones believing that those same medications are harmful in the long run due to their addictive nature. It is obvious that Rush is suffering from long term pain that is not able to be relieved through surgical means and the long term usage of pain relievers is the only way to relieve said pain.

It is wrong to prohibit pain relief for someone just because the medication is addictive.

327 posted on 10/10/2003 1:42:40 PM PDT by dglang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
To all of you sitting at your typewriter going "tsk tsk Rush is a hypocrite" OR "I hope he becomes as perfect as ME because I am a [insert political/religious adjective]" I say to YOU: it takes an ugly cold SCHADENFREUDE Heart to not wish healing and recovery from this. Your lack of sympathy convinces me your viewpoint is devoid of any true humanity. Shame on you.

As for the five minutes he took to lay this down for his audience, it takes a MAN to do that, and a GOOD man, who understands and DEMONSTRATES the very responsibility he has been professing for years.

Compare that five minutes to the Eon it took for the Clintons to pollute this country with the long poisonious BOOMER FART that has been building up since Bill and Hill first dressed up in their maggot infested tye-dyes and fringe and lovebeads and granny glasses.

328 posted on 10/10/2003 1:43:03 PM PDT by Alkhin (He thinks I need keeping in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
Precisely because we are not liberals.

We do not equivocate every unfairness or unpleasantry or failure.

We also believe in accountibility...and sad as it is...Rush will have to live through his.

Believe me, I wish this was somebody else.
329 posted on 10/10/2003 1:43:45 PM PDT by wardaddy (The Lizard King it was.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
have you ever sufffered from chronic, unrelenting pain

No, but my wife does. She has never taken painkillers.

However, that isn't the point. The point is he broke the law, big time, after spending years lecturing the liberals about mollycoddling criminals.

This is sooooo stupid on his part. He did not need to fall into this.

I suppose in the eyes of true believers, its no more discrediting than multiple divorces and remarriages or any other misbehavior.

I thought Republicans, if they are going to uphold moral standards, should attempt to follow them themselves.

330 posted on 10/10/2003 1:44:08 PM PDT by Hermann the Cherusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
Did you read his statement?

Yes, he stated he first stated taking prescription drugs that were prescribed by his doctor.

Did you notice when the statement didn’t say. It didn’t say that he didn’t eventually begin obtaining those same drugs illegally, as the story that exposed his problem has claimed.

I know, I know, his lawyers have advised him not to discuss that. Let’s see if you can figure out exactly why his lawyers have advised him not to discuss that. It's kinda obvious.

A denial of illegality can absolutely never hurt your case if in fact you have done nothing illegal.

331 posted on 10/10/2003 1:44:21 PM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I am disappointed in his conduct and any money he (allegedly) may have contributed to the illegal drug trade, albeit prescription. Nonetheless, as long as he does not lie publicy, I'm content for him to remain silent and take care of his problem. Law enforcement and prosecutors will determine if there is a need to charge him. It's not like he is a violent perp. He has only damaged himself and betrayed the trust others had in him. He is still an articulate spokesman for what millions believe, albeit his role will undoubtably be diminished or changed.

I agree with you. I am disappointed in him, but legally he does have to protect himself. Sadly, he put himself in this position.

But his concern should not be coming back to the program in 30 days. It's an arbitrary deadline, one he may or may not make--even if he comes out of rehab in 30 days, he may be fragile, both physically and emotionally. The pressure on him to come back within that time period has to be enormous (both on himself, his radio show, the stations that carry his radio show, the advertisers on his radio show, etc.), but that should not be his focus. His career should be secondary to his health at this time. If he doesn't do it that way, there's a good chance of relapse.

332 posted on 10/10/2003 1:45:42 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
I won't say "can't", but will say "not revealed" and "fruitless speculation".

It's not fruitless speculation to say that unbaptized infants are in God's sight when you've got a weeping mother looking for consolation.

And who knows that it's not true?

333 posted on 10/10/2003 1:46:18 PM PDT by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter! You'll save at least one life, maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Grando Calrissian
So ... you would prefer what?

Yes, the rich are different from the rest of us. They have more money.

334 posted on 10/10/2003 1:46:30 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (Mooo !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: dead
I'm convinced Rush broke the law. There's no way he ingested tons of pills legally. His legal dance supports that.
335 posted on 10/10/2003 1:46:46 PM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: Tempest; sinkspur; hchutch; Right Wing Professor
Its hard to describe the tone he used in writing - and thats what I'm reacting to more than anything else.

And it may be that I'm all wet, and made more out of that than needs be. If so, then thrash me one good.

336 posted on 10/10/2003 1:46:49 PM PDT by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
I'd like for you to cite for me any case law that list abuse of prescription drugs is a criminal offense.

You are engaged in semantics here. Abuse of prescription drugs CAN be illegal. Here is what NY state says about it:
http://www.ric.goer.state.ny.us/wbt/drugfree/state.html
337 posted on 10/10/2003 1:47:06 PM PDT by UseYourHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I once had this dream...you and I were sitting in a coffee shop in Timbucktoo...you had a lap-top and a Sabertooth Tiger wrapped around your neck...I was drinking a Mocha Cafe Latte decaf double sugar and whipped cream....I turned to talk to you about a dream I had had the night before and you had this far off in the distance look on your face.
338 posted on 10/10/2003 1:47:20 PM PDT by Neets (Frogs have it easy..they can eat whatever's bugging them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: ThePythonicCow
Are you saying he should turn himself in (if he did something illegal), for you to consider him consistent? I don't recall Rush ever advocating that drug users or dealers should turn themselves in...Our legal system does not ask people to incriminate themselves.

No, and I don’t really want to beat it to death, given the fact that we don’t know if he’s done anything illegal.

Essentially, what I said was that, if he continues to support criminal charges, including incarceration and confiscation of property, that’s a glaring inconsistency, and IMO he’s being hypocritical.

No, I don’t expect him to turn himself in.

339 posted on 10/10/2003 1:48:35 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: dglang
Rush is using pain medications for a very specific medical purpose, he isn't abusing drugs for 'recreational' purposes. He also is not engaging in various criminal activites to obtain his needed medication. He is also not running around in a 'high' state and out of control

I think you are kidding yourself about every one of these points.

I wish Rush a speedy recovery. Last week, I heard how Rush was being set up, how he was going to collect some fabulous libel settlement, all sorts of nonsense.

Your post is the obvious evolution of that babble. It's great that you want to put the best possible spin on the situation, but you sound pretty naive when you say there was no recreational aspect to it.

Rush himself said he wasn't a victim. Don't try to make him one.
340 posted on 10/10/2003 1:48:52 PM PDT by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 561-569 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson