Skip to comments.
Novak: A Democratic debacle
Townhall.com ^
| 10/09/03
| Robert Novak
Posted on 10/08/2003 9:28:07 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
10/08/2003 9:28:07 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Thank you, Gov. Hiram Johnson...
2
posted on
10/08/2003 9:34:51 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: All
|
Keep Our Republic Free
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com |
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson! IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR THANKS! |
3
posted on
10/08/2003 9:35:13 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Pokey78
"...the...creation of a moderate California Republican Party." Yep, I'd say we've got that here big-time.
4
posted on
10/08/2003 9:36:11 PM PDT
by
doingtherightthing
((I voted for Tom and Bustamante didn't win after all, did he south40?)
To: Pokey78
For weeks, California Democrats have been confiding to me that the recall of Gov. Gray Davis was inevitable and the election of the popular actor was probable. SOMEBODY LEAKED TO NOVAK!!!!!!!!!!!!! This calls for a special prosecutor.
5
posted on
10/08/2003 9:36:32 PM PDT
by
Jeff Chandler
(mislead, misled, lie, lied, failed, failure,leaked, revenge, etc., etc., etc..)
To: Pokey78
Thanks for posting this.
Part of our problem is the professionalism of the electorial staff, the statisticians, lobbyists, and campaign managers who package issues on both sides. Elections end up being close, and then the ability of one side or another gerrymander the districts so a close election will almost always express the success of the previous gerrymander.
only when the gerrymander is outdated from growth, or a vast shift in the electorate can the professionalism be overcome. The state boundaries are less succeptable to gerrymandering, so the Senate is now our most variable federal government body, the opposite of the founders intent.
A cure?
one option is proportional representation, instead of first past the post, but that would help minor parties more than the electorate. I don't think it would be an improvement to have the decisions made in a smoke filled room by professional politicians assembling coalitions.
second option would be to come up with an algorithm that would "randomly" distribute districts along the political spectrum, so one district would have the most right wing electorate, (sutter county) another would have the most left wing (sanfrancisco?) and the rest would be distributed in between. I put that out, and suggest that some Freeper working on his polysci or applied math PHD might take up the challenge.
6
posted on
10/08/2003 9:39:10 PM PDT
by
donmeaker
(Bigamy is one wife too many. So is monogamy.)
To: Pokey78
Everybody knew what Bob Mulholland, the poison-tongued state Democratic Party spokesman, was talking about when he predicted that Schwarzenegger would be facing "real bullets" in the campaign. He is Wormtongue.
7
posted on
10/08/2003 9:39:36 PM PDT
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space for rent)
To: Pokey78
the potential creation of a moderate California Republican PartyModerate meaning you take half the (R) platform and half the (D) platform and run with it. Is this good or bad for conservatism in the long run?
To: Pokey78
For once in California, the Republicans were the pragmatists. Pragmatism is not a mortal sin.
9
posted on
10/08/2003 9:43:01 PM PDT
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a dog or a cat from a shelter! You'll save at least one life, maybe two!)
To: Jeff Chandler
Novak leaked it..he's gotta go.
10
posted on
10/08/2003 9:45:41 PM PDT
by
teeples
(A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Sir Winston Churchill)
To: Pokey78
Arnold Schwarzenegger's landslide victory in the California recall...Let's be honest. Arnold's 48% was not an overwhelming victory by itself. If you add in McClintock's 13%, you reach 61% and that is a great majority of votes for one side. The Republican side. Not the Arnold side.
11
posted on
10/08/2003 9:46:36 PM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: Sir Gawain
"Moderate meaning you take half the (R) platform and half the (D) platform and run with it. Is this good or bad for conservatism in the long run?" However one might wish to characterize it -- "half a loaf is better than none", e.g. -- it represents a shift to the right. And less power for the left.
And those are both good things.
12
posted on
10/08/2003 9:49:20 PM PDT
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: Pokey78
Would have thought also that Terry McAulliffe's head would have been served on a platter by now. . .
Of course,there is 'no low', too 'low' for a committed rat; but I hate to see where this takes them as they prepare even more desperately, to discredit/undermine Arnold; and with even more contemptible passion; if possible; President Bush.
And I do wonder what Hillary's muse is saying to her now.
13
posted on
10/08/2003 9:54:53 PM PDT
by
cricket
To: Sir Gawain
It certainly is better for California to get a 1/2 D 1/2 R governor instead of another three years of a pure, far left "D". Given that the state seems unwilling to elect a pure conservative a 1/2 way conservative is the best choice.
To: Sir Gawain
It certainly is better for California to get a 1/2 D 1/2 R governor instead of another three years of a pure, far left "D". Given that the state seems unwilling to elect a pure conservative a 1/2 way conservative is the best choice.
To: Pokey78
Words of advice for Democrats: You live by the Clinton, you die by the Clinton.
Hey Bob Mulholland, you worthless piece of human slime, so Arnold was going to face "real bullets"? How did you like both barrels right between your eyes last night?
16
posted on
10/08/2003 10:00:56 PM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(I DONATED! HAVE YOU? DONATE NOW OR I'LL HAVE YOU TAKEN OFF THE DO NOT CALL LIST)
To: sinkspur
Some think pragmatism is a heretical break from the "Holy Scripture" of rigid ideology, punishable by burning at the stake.
17
posted on
10/08/2003 10:01:58 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: okie01; Pokey78; *calgov2002; AuntB; jam137; GmbyMan; DoctorZIn; fooman; PeoplesRep_of_LA; ...
All this happened with the political establishment -- including the Bush White House -- as an uneasy bystander.
The instruments of direct citizen participation that were devised early in the 20th century by such progressives as California's Hiram Johnson always have been hated by the professional politicians. The passage of Proposition 13 property tax reduction in the state in 1978 and the recall of Gray Davis worked just as Johnson envisioned. The benefits that may be bestowed on the Republican Party constitute a major side effect.
OFFICIAL BUMP(TOPIC)LIST
18
posted on
10/08/2003 10:03:30 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(All we need from a Governor is a VETO PEN!!!)
To: Pokey78
Yet, Davis's inner circle and the state party leadership could think only of personal attacks on Schwarzenegger to avoid a Democratic debacle. Novak seems to be getting an inkling of what FReepers have known for years -- the Democrats have no ideas, no energy, no principles, no shame. All they have is pandering, attacks on their opponents and legal chicanery. There is no there there, anymore.
To: ambrose
Also Arnold talking yesterday about REDISTRICTING Kalifornia........
20
posted on
10/08/2003 10:08:24 PM PDT
by
jdontom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson