To: .cnI redruM
Laws are different for Democrats. They campaign in black churches without danger to the tax exempt status of the church. They break campaign finance laws and when caught demand that the law be made stronger, as if the law were at fault rather than them.
We have to just get over it. They get a free ride and we are held not only to the letter of the law but must avoid even the appearance of wrong doing.
8 posted on
10/08/2003 8:25:35 AM PDT by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
They just 'interpret' laws differently.
9 posted on
10/08/2003 8:30:01 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(Zot me and my screen name gets even dorkier!)
To: Mind-numbed Robot
Laws are different for Democrats.Is he a Democrat? Remember the debate a few weeks ago, where the first question was to ask Clark if he was a Democrat? Well, it turns out (someone did some digging, Business Week I think), and he hadn't bothered to register in the Democratic Party at that point. How the heck did he even get in the debate? How could Clark possibly be that stupid and/or arrogant?
20 posted on
10/08/2003 10:51:47 AM PDT by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
To: Mind-numbed Robot
Laws are different for Democrats. They campaign in black churches without danger to the tax exempt status of the church. They break campaign finance laws and when caught demand that the law be made stronger, as if the law were at fault rather than them. IOW, the Democrats are now the Whites and the Republicans are the Blacks, in post-Civil War Reconstruction and beyond. Harry Truman, JFK and Bobby Kennedy be darned for not extending civil rights protections to us pubbies.
I don't really blame Truman and the Kennedy boys, but I am serious in my analogy.
21 posted on
10/08/2003 10:58:35 AM PDT by
GretchenEE
(Liberals CANNOT be trusted with national security.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson