Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems: New Recall in 100 Days
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/08/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 10/07/2003 9:16:27 PM PDT by kattracks

California Democrat Party state spokesman Bob Mulholland said his party is giving Arnold Schwarzenegger just 100 days before a new recall effort may be launched.

Mulholland made his threat on Fox News Tuesday night after polls closed and major press outlets declared Arnold Schwarzenegger the winner.

On Tuesday, Gray Davis declined to refute reports that he may back a new recall effort against Schwarzenegger.

Already press reports indicate that Democrats have $3 million prepared for a new recall effort.

Also, Hollywood billionaire Stephen Bing has promised to finance any Democratic-backed recall effort.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: bobmulholland; davisrecall; desperatedems; dirtytricks; governorarnold; recall2; soreloserman; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-236 next last
To: Lazamataz
Every note of Clinton's song fell flat.

Music to my ears.

141 posted on 10/08/2003 12:16:44 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Himself?
142 posted on 10/08/2003 12:17:42 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Good news !..............Hope yer days are easy Laz !

Stay Safe !

143 posted on 10/08/2003 12:24:14 AM PDT by Squantos (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Now real information is making it to the public, and the Dims are being exposed for what they really are.

And it is a VERY comforting feeling and tonight I will sleep well!

I know what the "Dim's" are IMO, if you don't mind me asking, what are they IYO? Similar to my opinion I'm sure. : )

Also, kattracks, keep up the great work in posting articles, for your posts are very appealing and I look forward to them when I get home from work! Midnight..(gasp)usually!

Regard's

144 posted on 10/08/2003 12:29:56 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
NO ON RECALL!!!
145 posted on 10/08/2003 12:38:47 AM PDT by Porterville (CALIFORNIA: FREE AT LAST, FREE AT LAST, THANK GOD ALMIGHTY WE ARE FREE AT LAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
<< rimshot >>
146 posted on 10/08/2003 12:41:25 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Y'know what.... I know he is..... I agree... but anything that throws the 'Rats into this much panic is a very very good thing.

See, there's another angle: California is considered a solid liberal Dem state now. And Bill Clinton went there to advise Davis.

Every note of Clinton's song fell flat.

Hillary has GOT to have noticed.

Don't expect her to run in 2004. Expect her in 2008 when the demographics have improved.

Ahhh, for once in my life "that flat note" is music to my ears!!

147 posted on 10/08/2003 12:41:33 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Thank you for your kind words.

I think we all know what the Dims are.

Power hungry, with no concern that their frantic dash for power will put the US in peril.

Appeasers, who will always blame the US first, regardless of the facts.

Hypocrites, who will forgive the most horrendous acts committed by a Dim, while trying to undermine any Republican for the slightest infraction, real or imagined.

Underhanded, they will use any means at their command to insure a win.

I think that just about covers it... for now.

148 posted on 10/08/2003 12:41:43 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Dems will focus on the state of CA like a lazer further neglecting the other offices perhaps more important than the Gov. Seat in CA.... The more they are distracted, the more Congressional seats we when... and the easier the walk for Bush into a second term

After tonight, Hillary will wait until 2008

149 posted on 10/08/2003 12:42:03 AM PDT by Porterville (CALIFORNIA: FREE AT LAST, FREE AT LAST, THANK GOD ALMIGHTY WE ARE FREE AT LAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
when = win
150 posted on 10/08/2003 12:43:04 AM PDT by Porterville (CALIFORNIA: FREE AT LAST, FREE AT LAST, THANK GOD ALMIGHTY WE ARE FREE AT LAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Hollywood billionaire Stephen Bing....boy, they really take care of their 'own' don't they?
He related to Chandler Bing? =)
What's that old Hank Sr. song....'There's A Tear In My Latte' =~)
151 posted on 10/08/2003 12:45:44 AM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reg45
"Why's that?"

To qualify a recall, a fixed percentage of the number of people who voted in the last election must sign the petition.

152 posted on 10/08/2003 12:54:25 AM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think that just about covers it...

It pretty much cinches the impression as to who their followers are! I think not, people who have a firm grasp of the dictations of our forefathers to be sure.

Good night, tomorrow is another day, another dollar! : )

153 posted on 10/08/2003 12:55:48 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"BTW, I have NEVER -- *EVER* -- in my life seen a newspaper so completely and directly repudiated, as the LA Times was tonight."

Oh, I don't know. The New York Times' editorial that bashed Dr. Robert Goddard...the same editorial that stated that flight in the vaccume of space was impossible and that Man could never reach the Moon, was pretty well repudiated on July 20, 1969 (not that I'm keeping score, or anything)...

154 posted on 10/08/2003 1:06:05 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Amazing ..!! 64% republican vote and the dems think they can get enough sigs for a recall. They have reached the delusional stage .. can bezerk be far behind ..??
155 posted on 10/08/2003 1:11:38 AM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Let's see, they've been through dishonesty, desperation, and now entering delusional.

The best, by far though is DEFEATED!

156 posted on 10/08/2003 1:15:27 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
No one could be more socially liberal than Rudy. He proved that LEADERSHIP trumps everything!

No one thought that New York City was governable. Rudy proved them wrong.

Arnold will go directly to the people if the legislature stands in the way of progress. They all fear the next election and won't be so quick to sabotage the state.

157 posted on 10/08/2003 1:22:11 AM PDT by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
No one could be more socially liberal than Rudy. He proved that LEADERSHIP trumps everything!

No one thought that New York City was governable. Rudy proved them wrong.

Arnold will go directly to the people if the legislature stands in the way of progress. They all fear the next election and won't be so quick to sabotage the state.

158 posted on 10/08/2003 1:22:54 AM PDT by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: strela; DoughtyOne; Tamsey; ladyinred; PhiKapMom; FairOpinion; onyx; EggsAckley; goldstategop; ...
ping
159 posted on 10/08/2003 1:54:41 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Don't expect (Hillary) to run in 2004. Expect her in 2008 when the demographics have improved.

Bill Clinton was ineffective in California.

Hillary will run in 2004. She'll fight very, very dirty because she figures she has to win to have any political future.

Otherwise, by 2008, the Dems will have purged their party of the Clintonites.

160 posted on 10/08/2003 2:05:22 AM PDT by xdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-236 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson