To: .cnI redruM
What exactly is so secretive about the operation now? The lid had already been blown off when it was discovered that the documents indicating that Iraq sought to purchase uranium from Niger were complete forgeries. How can you say Wilson is in violation of any oath of secrecy?
To: sheltonmac
He reports for the CIA, not the New York Times.
9 posted on
10/07/2003 8:54:24 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(Zot me and my screen name gets even dorkier!)
To: sheltonmac
>> What exactly is so secretive about the operation now? The lid had already been blown off when it was discovered that the documents indicating that Iraq sought to purchase uranium from Niger were complete forgeries. How can you say Wilson is in violation of any oath of secrecy? <<
You are attempting to perpetuate the myth that the forged documents were the only evidence being investigated. Vice President Cheney's inquiries about Niger, the purported reason for the mission, started prior to the forged documents surfacing. The British contend their source is not the forged documents. The mission was secret or not. One potential element becoming public does not unbind anyone who is legally held silent.
16 posted on
10/07/2003 9:24:17 AM PDT by
CMAC51
To: sheltonmac
What exactly is so secretive about the operation now? The lid had already been blown off when it was discovered that the documents indicating that Iraq sought to purchase uranium from Niger were complete forgeries. How can you say Wilson is in violation of any oath of secrecy?Methods and sources, confirmation of floated info; Unless specifically authorized by competent authorities, he cannot reveal classified information on his own whim, even if it is already in the public sector.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson