Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Recall Live Thread

Posted on 10/07/2003 5:34:25 AM PDT by Sabertooth



Do it California. Post here.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: adiosdavis; bewaredemvotefraud; ccrm; militaryvote; presstitutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 4,181-4,193 next last
To: Sabertooth
Just heard soundbyte from Gray: I feel great. I've always trusted the voters to do the right thing....

Yes Gray. We're throwing you out. Enjoy.
701 posted on 10/07/2003 12:31:53 PM PDT by Roarkdude (no tag line entered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: norton
YOU may not feel that providing infrastructure is one of the most important functions of state government, but I do. When CA is spending under 1/2%, and the politicians are not admonished in some way to do so, then it is no wonder jobs are leaving that state. It was not long ago that CA was spending about 20% on that.

It appears from your list that those on it are not "labor unions" in general, but are those who are interested in jobs for CA. Both "RINO-Arnie" and "McKlintock" support #53 - (I have no dog in this fight - I would like to see CA become a viable state again.) In contrast, the "no on 53" folks are indeed heavily (teachers & other welfare agent) union associated.

I'm sorry you were duped by the "Busta & 53" ad campaign, as you said in post 612.

Truth sometimes hurts, I know, but sometimes it is best to simply state you were duped, than to keep defending a mistake.
702 posted on 10/07/2003 12:32:39 PM PDT by AFPhys (((PRAYING for: President Bush & advisors, troops & families, Americans)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
would a spoiled ballot with both chads punched actually be counted in both columns? Of course it wouldn't change the vote totals by doing so? Or would it count as a non vote, and not part of the 50% +1.

Has this issue ever been addressed? If the law isn't specific, the courts will address it. If the margin of victory or defeat in the recall is less than the amount of ballots spoiled on just the 1st question alone, somebody will take this to court unless the law is specific here.

703 posted on 10/07/2003 12:32:56 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 696 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Servant of the 9
Orange County is using optical scanner for this election. March we will be using something called an e-slate machine. I saw one in July and IMO they s**k. If you get easily confused by electronic gadgets, you will be confused by the screen.

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/996791/posts
704 posted on 10/07/2003 12:33:19 PM PDT by NathanR (California Si! Aztlan NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 691 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
That's not a good sign. It just means Davis's cronies are busy printing up there own ballots with Davis votes.
705 posted on 10/07/2003 12:33:32 PM PDT by Tempest (9th inning of a winning game and you guys are still whining to trade pitchers?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 687 | View Replies]

To: mhking
They recognize the writing on the wall. They know the only way they can win this is to steal it in the courts (i.e., pushing for liberal judges who don't give a sh*t about the law).

I think they know they will ultimately lose, but they want to push it till it has to be apealed to the US Supreme Court for a decision.
Then in '04, the national Dems will be screaming about Republicans "Stealing Elections" in Florida and California.

It will be a very effective smear.

So9

706 posted on 10/07/2003 12:33:35 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Republicans for Sharpton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 694 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
Oh! OK.
707 posted on 10/07/2003 12:34:57 PM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: All
Hardly anyone was at the polling place at 10:30 AM when my husband and I got there, but it's the third time in as many elections that the location has been changed and there was a sparsity of the usual signs indicating an election was being held anywhere around, not to mention the total lack of convenient parking...hmmm...

Then I got inside, and by some clerical error I had been eliminated from the registration. I had to vote provisionally, which ticked me off exceedingly, because I haven't moved in years and have voted many times from this address. Still managed to vote to boot Mr. Roberts' Evil Twin out and Arnie in.

McC is a good man, and I hope he either gets a high position in The Governator's administration or else runs against Feinstein or Boxer. I'd work for his campaign under those circumstances.
708 posted on 10/07/2003 12:35:42 PM PDT by Scothia (Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: tallhappy
I stand corrected, I thought you said to vote no for the leading Republican candidate.
709 posted on 10/07/2003 12:35:42 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Stay aware of voter fraud techniques which are sure to be employed by the Democrats using the recently-passed Illegal-License law.

I imagine hundreds of women with a Driver License saying "Maria Hernandez" will be going from poll to poll to poll to take the place of the perhaps 20,000 women with that name in California who otherwise would not bother to vote.

No poll volunteer would turn someone away with such an ID. The fraud using this technique could be on a MASSIVE SCALE...Do NOT underestimate this.

In addition, I almost guarantee that a Judge citing "polling problems" will order the polls in "minority" areas to stay open an extra 1-2 hrs to get all these Marias and Joses into the polls...just as they did against Ashcroft in St Louis in 2000.

710 posted on 10/07/2003 12:35:42 PM PDT by montag813 (Fire Tenet...Jail Joseph Wilson...Rally 'Round Our President, Dammit!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bootyist-monk
50% plus 1 of the votes cast on the recall question only.

Understood -- still looking for authoritative source for that. A ballot with neither "YES" nor "NO" votes does not represent a voter, for the purposes of Q1. The "non-voted" ballots are not considered in the recall question.

Assuming that's the case, then the "Yes" and "No" advocates have the same risk of overlooking Q1, and neither side of that issue has an inherent advantage or disadvantage based on such oversight.

711 posted on 10/07/2003 12:35:43 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
It will only end up hurting them more. They can't run on anything positive and if today's shellacking doesn't knock common sense into them, nothing will. I love the smell of total Democrat meltdown...
712 posted on 10/07/2003 12:37:11 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 706 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
This is interesting.

California code here:

11382. No vote cast in the recall election shall be counted for any candidate unless the voter also voted for or against the recall of the officer sought to be recalled.

So, if you mess up question 1, your vote doesn't count in question 2. You also are not considered part of the 50%+1

By my reading of this, those who today said they forgot to vote on question 1 have lost their candidate choice as well.

713 posted on 10/07/2003 12:39:06 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

To: bootyist-monk
If the recall yes vote is 50%+1 then does the law require the replacement governor to get 50%+1 of the candidate votes or just a majority?
714 posted on 10/07/2003 12:39:36 PM PDT by Jaded (But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you. Mat. 5:44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 693 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I just registered with Free Republic and have only been reading your posts for a short time. Good work guys. Keep it up.
715 posted on 10/07/2003 12:40:03 PM PDT by Maitai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 698 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
That code section was overturned by a court. A non-voted Yes/No may still cast a vote for a candidate. I have a link to the court citation somewhere above, on this thread.
716 posted on 10/07/2003 12:40:54 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 713 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
For Davis to be recalled the YES must be over 50%.
717 posted on 10/07/2003 12:41:08 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 714 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Sounds like the lawsuit loophole is built in.
718 posted on 10/07/2003 12:41:26 PM PDT by Jaded (But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you. Mat. 5:44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 711 | View Replies]

Can you spot the "No on Recall, Yes on Bustamante" voter on this picture? (Hint: he's got a wet nose)


719 posted on 10/07/2003 12:41:39 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few; and let another take his office. (Recall Davis))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 712 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"Arnold, What is best in life"?

"Crush Gray Davis

See him driven before you

And hear the lamentation of the women"

720 posted on 10/07/2003 12:41:59 PM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 652 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 681-700701-720721-740 ... 4,181-4,193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson