Vanity: The Democrats and the L.A. Times must be defeated!!

Vanity | October 6, 2003 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

The Los Angeles Times and the Democrat corruption machine must be defeated!! No ifs, ands, or buts about it!

This is bigger than Schwarzenegger vs McClintock, bigger than Republican vs Democrat, and even bigger than conservative vs liberal. This is for our American way of life vs the dark side. Not just for California, but for all of America. The leadership of the Democrat Party and their official party platform of corruption, abortion, homosexualism, socialism, slavery to big government, slavery to over-taxation, slavery to terrorism and willing subjugation to foreign powers and world bodies is pure evil. Yes, I'd rather have a more conservative person than Arnold for California, but sorry folks, looks like the numbers aren't there. And I'm unwilling to take chances on allowing Davis to slip out of the recall or, even worse, to allow Bustamante to win the governorship.

Crushing liberalism is what Free Republic is all about. Gray Davis being recalled by the (mostly Democrat) people of California has got to be one of the greatest defeats for liberalism in recent history. And the additional rejection by the same democrat electorate of the ultra-liberal, illegal-alien-loving, tax-them-till-they-die, Cruz Bustamante will be the coup de grâce!

The Democrats are pulling out all the stops on this one. They see losing California as what it is, a death blow for liberalism. The people of California are sending the Los Angeles Times, the New York Times, the Democrat Party, and Bill & Hillary Clinton a great big rejection slip!

No thanks! Your liberalism, socialism, corruption and evil murderous programs are not welcome!

Send them your own personal message and slap in the face and one they cannot misinterpret and will not soon forget.

Terminate Gray Davis! Terminate Cruz Bustamante! And terminate the idiot Democrat Party and their complicit partners in crime, the Los Angeles Times, et al!

Vote Yes on Recall and vote Yes for the Terminator!!

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Arnold is in George Harrison's place. : )

[FairOpinion]

Let's win first!

Then let's give Arnold a chance, instead of crouching into attack mode immediately. If he wins, remember, the Dems are going to start their own attacks.

They will scream "quagmire" in CA, just as they are doing it in Iraq. We all know, that CA can't be turned around on a dime. I think we should support Arnold, I think he is going to get good advisors, but it will take him a few month at the very least to get the lay of the land.

But as I said, let's not jump the gun, let's wait to make sure we really win. We can't count out the Dem voter fraud machine.

[onyx]

hey, good idea! Sleep well and vote early.

See you later today. History in the making!

[DoughtyOne]

In the movie Arnold is a guy that was kept on a South Pacific island until he was in his early twenties. At that time he is informed he has a twin brother and he goes looking for him. Arnold is innocent and pure as the drive snow. Danny Devito, his twin, is a Hollywood fast talking sleaze bag operator. The story plays out with the Devito character hoodwinking the Schwarzenegger character, and them slowly becoming friends during the process. It's a cute movie. Nothing very deep so be warned.

[Tamzee]

Thanks so much... and you, too, incredibly :-)

Goodnight and have the prettiest and sweetest of dreams...

[DoughtyOne]

I came up with this one. I'm glad you liked it. I appreciate the feedback.

[onyx]

I can hardly wait to see what all the audit reveals.

Beginning tomorrow, gray's shredding service will be working overtime.

What a delight it shall be to see gray carted out of the capitol, hopefully in handcuffs.

[FairOpinion]

Thanks!

As long as it ends well. :)

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

I agree. Good heavens, woman are not as weak as people believe us to be. Anyone I didn't want to grab me who ever HAS grabbed me learned very quickly that I wasn't going along with it. Then I got over it.

Why couldn't these women do the same? Do you need a permission slip to hit on a woman now? If any of this is true, it sounds like that's what he was doing, however awkwardly. They should have slapped him across the face if they didn't like it.

[stands2reason]

See: Occam's Razor

[Tamzee]

Silly me... should have guessed ;-)

[Tamzee]

I should have realized it was yours... brilliant, witty and right on target :-)

Signed,
A D1 Fan

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

HA! : )

[onyx]

There's a whole lot more of us than them. That's why I KNEW this LASlimes had erred big time.

Only bull-dikes, feminazis and wallflowers would proclaim their lives were "ruined or sullied" over ridiculous nonsense they've alleged.

[DoughtyOne]

The plot winds up with Schwarzenegger taking out a hitman that was sent to take him and his brother out. I'm still trying to figure out if this more closely resembles Davis or the Times or both.

[jagrmeister]

Jim, Thank you for having the courage to make this bold statement. Republicans need to unite behind the one conservative who can win- and that's Arnold Schwarzenegger. If people don't listen to your reasoning, I don't think anything can get through to them.

[NormsRevenge]

Im not saying jump on him on day one or be in attack mode from the get go,, but we do need to be vigilant and not be shy to voice our concerns as things unfold.

He will get his honeymoon period, but like President Bush's, it will be short and the learning curve, very steep. We all know the obstacles this state faces economically.

There will be little time for happy faces and photo ops. Jobs do not grow on trees and neither do businesses. He has set his own standard high. Are we not then allowed to hold him to it?

By the time the budget cycle begins, however, we will have a pretty good idea who he is listening to or seeking guidance and counsel from.

The buffetts and such will hopefully have been moved down the ladder a few rungs or out of the way or it will serve to only raise many's concerns that we may have been snookered again or to question the choice to give him the opportunity to "lead" and not doddle.

Saying that is not an attack,but is a reminder that we are being asked to trust , but I believe in Reagan's version of Trust but Verify more than just blind trust. I'm funny that way, sorry.

I will be as curious as anyone as to who will be on his team of advisors, etc. I would hope that some who were on his initial team will not necessarily be included on his full time team. Also, let's see if the conservatives or "purists" also have their place at the table. After all, they have been asked to climb aboard and support him.

Well, let's see if he really is just saying lip service or does he really mean it. Time will tell, and it won't probably take that long to get the drift of his openness, willingess and ability to deal with the issues at hand without just raising taxes as a first versus last resort.

The demrats will need to be reminded as well of their out and out culpability of putting this state where it is , deep in debt and sucking wind and killing businesses with their lunatic legislation the last few years.

[GOPrincess]

"We crush more of liberalism by taking out Davis and Bustamante than we do by crushing Arnold. That's the bottom line."

Agree. I like McClintock's policy ideas best, but finally decided Hugh Hewitt is right: a vote for McClintock is really a vote for Bustamante and thus not really a pro-life vote, etc. -- whereas a pro-Arnold vote may also help Bush win CA and maybe pull in enough Republican Senators to have veto-proof judicial nominations, etc. I've always been very conservative (i.e., Simon over Riordan) but I'm going to bite the bullet and vote for Arnold tomorrow. I do also consider it a vote against the LA TIMES, and I hope they realize bigtime that their unethical "shoe drop" blew up in their faces.

[NormsRevenge]

paying=saying

willingness=willingess

G'Nite Folks

Vote!

[GOPrincess]

"Don't you think that if the charges could stand up to scrunity, they would have made them weeks ago and spent weeks harping on them. The very fact that they sprung it last minute, shows that the charges woud disintegrate upon close scrunity, as some of them already being shown to be totally false."

Yep. I would never condone truly awful behavior (i.e., Clinton) and if it turns out some of this stuff about Arnold is true I'll be disappointed, but just listening tonight to the story of Gloria Allred's new "client" fall apart (via a caller to KFI), who knows how much of this is just garbage, especially with the TIMES using all those anonymous sources, who could be *anyone*. (I was appalled Ceci Connolly defended the TIMES on the Fox News panel today, saying the Thursday "shoe drop day" story just "wasn't ready" any earlier -- Michael Barone called it for what it was, partisan dumping on the candidate the TIMES didn't like.)