Skip to comments.
The WMD Evidence(WSJ editorial)
Wall Street Journal ^
| Oct 5, 2003
| editorial
Posted on 10/06/2003 1:49:40 AM PDT by The Raven
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:50:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
"We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002."
As we read David Kay's report last week on the weapons search in Iraq, the paragraph above is the real news. It concludes, even in this interim report, that Saddam Hussein was systematically attempting to evade inspections in blatant violation of United Nations Resolution 1441.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: davidkay; iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
The Media and Democrat's bias on this have but a stop to the war on terrorism. This is ugly partisanship at its worst.
1
posted on
10/06/2003 1:49:40 AM PDT
by
The Raven
To: All
"Please contribute to FreeRepublic and make these posts go away"
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar! Thanks Registered
|
2
posted on
10/06/2003 1:51:54 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Molly Pitcher
3
posted on
10/06/2003 2:00:52 AM PDT
by
The Raven
(<==see my home page!)
To: The Raven
Unless there's a warehouse full of drones(he did have some),missiles loaded with mustard gas,barrels of WMD,powdered anthrax,and uranium,the media says..nothing found...the war is a fraud.
4
posted on
10/06/2003 2:04:27 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: The Raven
"We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002."
Seems to be plenty of justification for our intervention, provided your head isn't stuck in the sand.
5
posted on
10/06/2003 2:05:45 AM PDT
by
Aeronaut
(In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
To: Aeronaut
There are those who simply will not give this report credence because they don't want us in "foreign entanglements" and trust nothing the government says.
There are those who dislike the President and want to discredit him on this board.
The Dems want the Presidency so they want him discredited.Most of the media is lazy when it isn't being partisan.Sigh
6
posted on
10/06/2003 2:20:07 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Aeronaut
And,....exactly where are those 30,000 Iraqi (SH) MYSTERY SHIPS?
/sarcasm
7
posted on
10/06/2003 3:24:17 AM PDT
by
maestro
To: The Raven
Bump
8
posted on
10/06/2003 3:39:23 AM PDT
by
knighthawk
(And for the name of peace, we will prevail)
To: The Raven
BTTT
To: MEG33
Let's face it. Nothing Kay finds will ever be enough for the dems. They MUST make sure that the credibility of the administration is in question. With the election just around the corner they are tasting blood. They want their power back at any cost. This is going to get worse as time goes on. They have changed the face of the enemy from the terrorists to the GOP.....and there it will reamin until they control the country once again.
10
posted on
10/06/2003 3:58:58 AM PDT
by
mrtysmm
To: The Raven
Bump!
To: ohioWfan; Peach; Howlin; Miss Marple
Good column.
12
posted on
10/06/2003 4:02:47 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
FYI
13
posted on
10/06/2003 4:21:58 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Aeronaut
Seems to be plenty of justification for our intervention, provided your head isn't stuck in the sand.Their heads are stuck somewhere, but it's definitely not sand...
14
posted on
10/06/2003 4:22:16 AM PDT
by
trebb
To: The Raven
"West Virginia Democrat Jay Rockefeller walked out of the Kay briefing to assert his dismay that nothing he'd heard proved Saddam's threat was "imminent" and thus pre-emption is wrong in all cases. In fact, the Bush Administration never subscribed to the "imminence" test when making its case for deposing Saddam. Mr. Bush flatly rejected it in this year's State of the Union address as too risky."
Once again the liberals are attempting to rewrite history to fit their agenda.
I guess one should not be surprised; it is their way.
15
posted on
10/06/2003 4:22:24 AM PDT
by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
To: PigRigger
I heard him and was furious.Jay looks so innocent but he is a party hack!
16
posted on
10/06/2003 4:24:08 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: trebb
Their heads are stuck somewhere, but it's definitely not sand... I know. I fought off the urge to word it properly.
17
posted on
10/06/2003 4:24:09 AM PDT
by
Aeronaut
(In my humble opinion, the new expression for backing down from a fight should be called 'frenching')
To: The Raven
If Kay brought in Saydamn sitting on a truck load of nukes, the democracts would say 'not enough evidence to go to war over'. N-O-T-H-I-N-G will change their tune.
18
posted on
10/06/2003 4:28:34 AM PDT
by
gulfcoast6
(The sun comes up, the sun goes down, what is important is what is done between the two events.)
To: The Raven
That cartoon makes too much sense!:-)) Guess that's why the lib critics of the war haven't figured it out....
19
posted on
10/06/2003 4:28:49 AM PDT
by
Molly Pitcher
(Is Reality Optional?)
To: MEG33
"he is a party hack...."
Will their ever be a time when our country will be put ahead of party?
I understand this happens on both sides of the isle; yet this issue should easily supercede political aspirations.
I am not one to ever lose hope; but this is really can pose significant danger to our troops in the field.
20
posted on
10/06/2003 4:29:58 AM PDT
by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson