Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Plenty of irony in Plame affair
Manchester Union Leader ^ | October 5, 2003 | Bernadette Malone

Posted on 10/05/2003 4:32:15 AM PDT by billorites

IF AMBASSADOR Joe Wilson’s wife, Valerie Plame, was indeed a covert agent for the CIA (and not just an analyst), and if a Bush administration official did expose her, a 1982 federal law may have been broken and someone should pay. But considering the many ironies of this story, Wilson’s allegation that Bush’s administration “outted” his wife to punish him (by risking her death, implicitly) just doesn’t figure.

Wilson wrote a New York Times op-ed faulting the White House for suspecting that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Niger. (An ambassador in both the George H.W. Bush and Clinton administrations and a long-time friend of and former aide to Al Gore, Wilson admits he became anti-George W. Bush after the 2000 South Carolina primary. He is now a big supporter of John Kerry’s Presidential campaign.)

Irony No. 1: The Bush administration allegedly released the name of a CIA officer as political payback against the officer’s husband. Doesn’t the Bush administration need the help and high morale of the CIA right now to help prosecute the War on Terror? What would it have to gain by putting a CIA operative’s life in danger? One must assume the leaker knew he wasn’t endangering Valerie Plame’s life.

Irony No. 2: Columnist Bob Novak was the journalist who printed Plame’s name. Novak opposed the war against Saddam Hussein because he, like Wilson, did not believe Saddam had weapons of mass destruction that were a threat to the United States. Was Novak used by the administration? Was he callous about Plame’s safety?

Having worked for Novak for five years, I know him to be an exceptionally savvy journalist who doesn’t allow himself to be used as a pawn of any administration. He is a patriot who cares deeply about the safety of men and women defending our country, and he is a recent convert to Catholicism who takes ethics and human life seriously.

Novak explained in his Oct. 1 column how Plame’s name ended up in his July 14 column. After Wilson’s predictably anti-Bush New York Times piece appeared, Novak probed into the matter of why the CIA would want a Kerry supporter to go to Niger to investigate possible “yellowcake” uranium sales in the first place. Administration officials said the reason Wilson was sent was because his wife, a CIA officer, pushed for him to go.

Here’s where a law may have been broken by administration officials, but here is where it also is necessary to digest a few facts.

The fact that Wilson’s wife was a CIA officer is newsworthy, because it tells Americans that even after the massive intelligence failure of September 11, the CIA may be making decisions based on politics and personal ties instead of what’s best for the country.

Was former ambassador Joe Wilson the best person to send to Niger to search for uranium dealers? Maybe not, given his strong anti-Bush bias and the implausibility of thugs from Niger revealing anything noteworthy to an official ambassador who grandstands in the New York Times about his CIA connection. Why did the CIA not send a qualified investigator in Wilson’s place?

Secondly, it is important to realize this: Lots of people in Washington work at the CIA, and most of them are not glamorous secret agents whose lives would be endangered if their identities were revealed. In fact, columnist Maureen Dowd has revealed that Plame blabbed to Wilson about her CIA work around the time of their first kiss. She was apparently as casual as the administration about her “cover.”

In the 10 years I spent in Washington, I met three people who rather off-handedly told me they had done work for “Langley,” the Virginia neighborhood where the CIA is openly situated. When Novak called the CIA to confirm his sources’ allegation, he wrote, the CIA confirmed it but asked him not to print Plame’s name. The CIA did not say that printing Plame’s name would endanger her. Instead the official said it could make traveling overseas more difficult for her, Novak reported.

Here’s where a journalist makes a decision about motives: Is it likely that the CIA asked that Plame’s name not be printed because her life or health would be jeopardized as an analyst? Or is it more likely that the CIA is embarrassed that someone found out the politics and personalities behind its post September 11 decision making?

Irony No. 3: Who are the fiercest defenders of CIA operatives and fiercest critics of “freedom of the press” now? U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., Harvard officials, and the editorial pages of the liberal Washington Post and New York Times.

If a law was broken, whoever broke it should pay the price. But let’s not be naive and accept Joe Wilson’s tripe about the White House wanting to endanger his wife as payback for his criticisms. The more likely motivation is administration concern that even after the CIA fell down on the job before 9/11, it continues to take short-cuts in the War on Terror.

Bernadette Malone is the former editorial page director.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alanfoley; bushbashing; cia; irony; josephwilson; leak; mediabias; plamenameblamegame; politicalsmear; robertnovak; valerieplame
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

1 posted on 10/05/2003 4:32:16 AM PDT by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: billorites
even after the CIA fell down on the job before 9/11, it continues to take short-cuts in the War on Terror.

Yes! Personally, I wouldn't be surprised if Novak had gotten her name from some relatively high-ranking type in the CIA itself.

2 posted on 10/05/2003 4:35:51 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Raise Your Hand If You Want To Donate To Free Republic!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

3 posted on 10/05/2003 4:36:26 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Looks like Mr. Wilson was a mole from the beginning has been found out to be a mole and now he seeks to divert attention away from being a mole.

Now the BIG question that must be answered WHO did Mr. Wilson meet with that sent him on his "sweet-tea" sipping trip?

Mr. Wilson says he does not know who sent him and would not recognize them if he met them on the street. Were these people in disguise or was he behind a two way mirror, and who did he report to with his findings that CIA used to discredit British INTEL?
4 posted on 10/05/2003 4:40:01 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
The CIA forgot that they are not policy makers. They are not elected official with the luxury of directing the course of the country. This story begins to touch on the issues that show that this is a story that will eventually take down Tenet and many others at the CIA. It probably will reach deep into the state department as well.
5 posted on 10/05/2003 4:43:55 AM PDT by Shanty Shaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
I've got one more question: Who was the Beeb's CIA source for their yellowcake stories?
6 posted on 10/05/2003 4:50:47 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shanty Shaker
William Kristol has written recently that the CIA is in open revolt againt the administration and that Bush is facing a civil war within his own government.

Bush needs to clean house at the CIA, and he should have started when he first took office.

7 posted on 10/05/2003 5:00:35 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
re: mole = Wilson

"The fact that Wilson’s wife was a CIA officer is newsworthy, because it tells Americans that even after the massive intelligence failure of September 11, "......the CIA may be making decisions based on politics and personal ties instead of what’s best for the country."

Although Wilson claims that he "offered" to go to Niger on assignment "pro bono" and that he only received expenses , chances are he received a nice lump sum in an off shore checking account.

Could this be why Mrs. so called Secret Agent Man was outed? That someone in the CIA who was not a 'mole' and had the best interests of the US Treasury at heart was aghast at the sum of money Wilson did receive for "sipping sweet tea" at government expense?

8 posted on 10/05/2003 5:00:44 AM PDT by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: billorites
"But let’s not be naive and accept Joe Wilson’s tripe about the White House wanting to endanger his wife as payback for his criticisms."

If the White House was in the business of paying back all the people who've come out against their policies, they'd be too busy to conduct the war and reconstruction of Iraq, not to mention run the country.

9 posted on 10/05/2003 5:02:29 AM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prognostigaator
Not sure yet that the MRS. was outed, considering Mr. Wilson placed her name in the public in "02". Maybe he outed her in bragging about who he knows and what he has done.

The objective here was to discredit British intel and yet an "operative's" husband, a political former ambassador hack is who gets sent.

This does not pass the smell test, so what the .e!! is going on and that is why the "WHO" sent him if so very important to find out.

The very idea that the WH should not be asking questions about intel is very telling. WHO is in charge?

This also exposes why the lying liberals were demanding special union protection under the HOmeland Security Act, protecting their OWN within that new agency.
10 posted on 10/05/2003 5:07:48 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: livius
...if Novak had gotten her name from some relatively high-ranking type in the CIA itself.

I have been several references to Wilson mentioning (bragging?) that his was worked for the CIA at cocktail parties.

11 posted on 10/05/2003 5:11:38 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke
I have been several references to Wilson mentioning (bragging?) that his was worked for the CIA at cocktail parties.

Uh, could you run that past me one more time?

12 posted on 10/05/2003 5:29:50 AM PDT by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: livius
A "DEMONRAT" one at that.
13 posted on 10/05/2003 5:35:49 AM PDT by GailA (Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Bush needs to clean house at the CIA, and he should have started when he first took office.

President Bush needs to clean the Clintonistas out of the State Department, Pentagon and FBI, too. Hundreds of new low-level jobs need to be created in broom closets at these agencies. They've shown that they are more interested in bringing down the president than protecting America.

14 posted on 10/05/2003 5:38:47 AM PDT by AF68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ben Chad
What? You can't read my equivalent of hanging chads?

(Sorry, didn't have any coffee yet.)

There have been reports of Wilson bragging that his wife worked for the CIA. Before the Novak article.

Attention seeking still, obviously.

15 posted on 10/05/2003 6:11:08 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: independentmind
Bush needs to clean house at the CIA

Do you understand the difference between political appointees and career bureaucrats? Your statement indicates you do not. You cannot just "clean house" of civil servants who disagree with you.

16 posted on 10/05/2003 8:46:28 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nwrep
You do not need to explain the difference between a civil servant and a political appointee to me. Have you ever heard of the expression "tone at the top?" Perhaps you don't understand the concept.
17 posted on 10/05/2003 8:50:10 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AF68
Maybe we need a Department of Reconsideration, or Department of Paranormal Prognostication, some place where errant careerists could be assigned to stare at peeling wallpaper and submit finely edited white papers on their efforts to readjust mind waves into some useful purpose.

Cutting most government staff by about half would probably improve their performance, especially if it was the right half left to do the job.
18 posted on 10/05/2003 9:20:22 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: billorites
The Novak article was published in July. Why did it take so long to become such a big deal?
19 posted on 10/05/2003 9:32:38 AM PDT by csmusaret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
Both the State Department and CIA should be cleaned out.
20 posted on 10/05/2003 9:51:08 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson