To: bmwcyle
Speaking of drugs, what have you been smoking?
Now add this tidbit ... I remember Rush on-air several times saying he does not bill his insurance company for drug expenses, he just pays cash for them. He admitted to not keeping records of his drug purchases nor did he total it up for taxes at year end. So Rush was an accidental sitting duck for the scam.
If the allegations are true, then in all likelihood, he didn't bill his insurance company for prescriptions, paid cash for his drugs, and failed to keep records for tax purposes because he didn't want a paper trail to follow him around.
Remember folks, even nice people can become druggies and, I guarantee that the more the addict has a stake (i.e., high profile in the community), the more time they will spend coming up with plausible explanations for behavior that otherwise doesn't make sense. And one of the reasons they are able to continue their addiction for so long is that they are surrounded by "enablers" who make excuses for them. If Rush, in fact, has a drug problem, then the best thing you do for him is to turn off the hero worship crap and stop making excuses for him. I just can't beleive how freaking naive some of you are when it comes to addiction and drug abuse. You sound like freaking democrates.
To: Labyrinthos
Neat and tidy, with a dash of sage observation... To bad the facts seem to point in another direction. FACT: the maid claimes to have been offered $100K(+) to go away and not talk about it. There is no statement whether or not she took the money or not. But, if I read my perps correctly, she did. Then, suddenly there she is as a CI (Confidential Informant) for the FBI. With tapes and everything.... Hmmmm...interesting... Why would she risk having to lose the $100K (ill-gotten gains and taxation) just for a moment of glory in the "Globe" no less. My guess is that she was a mule for the store owner and his wife and picked up on the imminent bust. SO using the pholosophy of a first strike, she concocted this story, probley with the creative advice of the demo-smear machine, and is running with it. For my nickle, why did they meet clandestinely at a Denny's (I think) parking lot??? She was his MAID for pit sakes... She could have just taken the pills to work with her. There was no need for the "secret squirrel" retinue. Methinks that the "rendezvous" was necessary becuase that is where she conducted business and by implicating Limbaugh, if someopne came forward and said that they had seen here there, she had plausible deniability. Then there is the matter of the bloody cigar humidor, Yeah, let me give you something that many many people have seen in my possession to transport drugs in. Yeah that is a stroke of genius. More likely, she stole it and since it was convenient, it became involved in the scam.
I am a cop, I can tell you that a scroat with a 100 pill a day habit would be barely coherent. There are those that will say that given the temperment of the Limbaugh show, there is already evidence of incoherency. But I digress...
This is a legitimate drug bust, one that probably has Limbaugh on the periphery, but, There is NO way that he was on a 100 pill per day binge. Oh, thats right, he was a DEALER, right??? he needed the money... Right??? Get Real. This is a frame. When the cops get through it will probably be suppressed by the lib media that the maid was in it up to her knickers....
OBTW, I don't even listen to Limbaugh, he is a bit over the top as far as I am concerned, but, I think that he is innocent on the drug rap.
Semper Fi
73 posted on
10/03/2003 2:26:43 PM PDT by
Trident/Delta
(Colt 1911 .45ACP .... The "original" point and click device.....)
To: Labyrinthos
No I am waiting for the facts. I have not heard them all yet. I am smoking nothing. I am giving him a break for now. I not out for blood like the shark you are.
76 posted on
10/03/2003 2:33:37 PM PDT by
bmwcyle
(Hillary's election to President will start a civil war)
To: Labyrinthos
"If the allegations are true, then in all likelihood, he didn't bill his insurance company for prescriptions, paid cash for his drugs, and failed to keep records for tax purposes because he didn't want a paper trail to follow him around. "
Or how about why bother? With his income range, AMT and the 7% rule for medical deductions I would safely assume there is no reason to keep any paperwork. But why do I need to tell someone as smart as you the obvious. I'm sure there was no malice in your theory.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson