To: Labyrinthos
Neat and tidy, with a dash of sage observation... To bad the facts seem to point in another direction. FACT: the maid claimes to have been offered $100K(+) to go away and not talk about it. There is no statement whether or not she took the money or not. But, if I read my perps correctly, she did. Then, suddenly there she is as a CI (Confidential Informant) for the FBI. With tapes and everything.... Hmmmm...interesting... Why would she risk having to lose the $100K (ill-gotten gains and taxation) just for a moment of glory in the "Globe" no less. My guess is that she was a mule for the store owner and his wife and picked up on the imminent bust. SO using the pholosophy of a first strike, she concocted this story, probley with the creative advice of the demo-smear machine, and is running with it. For my nickle, why did they meet clandestinely at a Denny's (I think) parking lot??? She was his MAID for pit sakes... She could have just taken the pills to work with her. There was no need for the "secret squirrel" retinue. Methinks that the "rendezvous" was necessary becuase that is where she conducted business and by implicating Limbaugh, if someopne came forward and said that they had seen here there, she had plausible deniability. Then there is the matter of the bloody cigar humidor, Yeah, let me give you something that many many people have seen in my possession to transport drugs in. Yeah that is a stroke of genius. More likely, she stole it and since it was convenient, it became involved in the scam.
I am a cop, I can tell you that a scroat with a 100 pill a day habit would be barely coherent. There are those that will say that given the temperment of the Limbaugh show, there is already evidence of incoherency. But I digress...
This is a legitimate drug bust, one that probably has Limbaugh on the periphery, but, There is NO way that he was on a 100 pill per day binge. Oh, thats right, he was a DEALER, right??? he needed the money... Right??? Get Real. This is a frame. When the cops get through it will probably be suppressed by the lib media that the maid was in it up to her knickers....
OBTW, I don't even listen to Limbaugh, he is a bit over the top as far as I am concerned, but, I think that he is innocent on the drug rap.
Semper Fi
73 posted on
10/03/2003 2:26:43 PM PDT by
Trident/Delta
(Colt 1911 .45ACP .... The "original" point and click device.....)
To: Trident/Delta
Just to build on what I said.... There are 1440 minutes in a 24 hour day, with 100 pills per day, He woul dhave to take one every 15 minutes, 24 hours a day, to keep up. No Way.
Semper Disgusted
75 posted on
10/03/2003 2:32:11 PM PDT by
Trident/Delta
(Colt 1911 .45ACP .... The "original" point and click device.....)
To: Trident/Delta
How many pharmacists were upposed to be involved? I can't see one pharmacist who is remotely legitimate thinking that they can give a complete refill a day to someone and get away with it.
84 posted on
10/03/2003 4:25:17 PM PDT by
lepton
To: Trident/Delta
I am a cop, I can tell you that a scroat with a 100 pill a day habit would be barely coherent. There are those that will say that given the temperment of the Limbaugh show, there is already evidence of incoherency. But I digress...I agree in that he was not doing 100 pills a day nor was he dealing. But I also know addicts very well, and if they have the money, they will always have a stash in case the pipeline dries up. (My ex-mother-in-law always had two months worth of canned goods in the pantry "just in case.") Also, many Vicodin/Oxyi addicts grind the pills and snort the dust to kill the time releasors. The conversion ration is not the same as the pills. In other words, one might use two to three times as much in powder form as in pill form.
To: Trident/Delta
FWIW- I agree with you. This is a slime job by the dems. I doubt Rush had anything to do with this except that his maid was in this drug ring.
133 posted on
10/03/2003 5:20:25 PM PDT by
GWfan
To: Trident/Delta
For my nickle, why did they meet clandestinely at a Denny's (I think) parking lot??? She was his MAID for pit sakes.I wondered about that myself. Even if she wasn't working for him at the time, why would he meet her anywhere? Why would he risk being seen taking a paper bag of stuff when all she has to do is come over with mop in hand, stay for 30 minutes, leave, and no one knows the difference?
However, I am just a little troubled there has been no denial of the underlying premise. Even as an attorney, I haven't thought of how a "I didn't do it" causes trouble. Even the feds don't prosecute false denials under the False Statement Act.
244 posted on
10/06/2003 9:24:10 AM PDT by
1L
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson