Skip to comments.
Magazine: Schwarzenegger Disrupted 1964 Neo-Nazi March in Graz, Austria
AFP via Yahoo! Germany ^
| October 3, 2003
| AFP
Posted on 10/03/2003 11:06:53 AM PDT by pogo101
According to a Jewish magazine, a young Arnold Schwarzenegger helped to disrupt a march of Neo-Nazis in his Austrian homeland.
As the magazine "NU" reported in its September issue, the 17-year-old Schwarzenegger helped anti-fascists heckle a demonstration of Neonazis.
The budding bodybuilder, along with other athletes, protested against the right-wingers in the city of Graz, 80-year-old Alfred Gerstl told the magazine. Gerstl, previously an active supporter of conservatives in Austria, feels he knows Schwarzenegger based on characteristic statements from that time, when Schwarzenegger was a friend of Gerstls son Karl.
TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: gerstl; hitler; nazi; neonazi; recall; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: ElkGroveDan
I'm sure Arnold will issue a statement that he has no recollection of that, since he can't recall more recent events.To try to keep things civil, although I don't really have any more respect for your hours of pinging and posting to trash Arnold than I had/have for those trashing Tom in various silly ways:
As I told Ambrose and suggested in my initial post, I wonder whether it happened at all. If Arnold did this and remembers it, then why wouldn't he have mentioned it, or something like it ("I rememmer prodesdigg against da Nazis march in Graaaz back in da sixdees") long ago? We at least agree on that.
21
posted on
10/03/2003 11:20:56 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: ambrose
do I ALWAYS have to put on a "< /sarcasm" tag or something? geez, some of you folks need to lighten up... especially the big Tom supporters. Our man said to be very skeptical of these last minute sleaze bombs. I'm relieved. But yes, I'm afraid with Dan and Clam and the other more-embittered of the Tom supporters posting and pinging to "pommp opp" these Arnold-is-a-sleaze last-minute stories, YES, I could use the "/sarcasm" marker ... :)
22
posted on
10/03/2003 11:22:45 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: shadowman99
"Fascism: a system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism."
American Heritage Dictionary (an older edition)
23
posted on
10/03/2003 11:22:53 AM PDT
by
steve50
(The only good drug addicts are rich drug addicts)
To: My2Cents
lol
24
posted on
10/03/2003 11:23:20 AM PDT
by
jwalburg
(You're not moderate just because you know leftier leftists than yourself)
To: pogo101
I can't believe I am entering the fray here, but I just want to point out that this fellow,Gerstl, has been quoted in other threads as Arnold's mentor, AND as this magazine was out, at least by today, I can only imagine that it isn't some quick response to the new Nazi allegations.
(As you might see in my tag line, this isn't my fight, just thought I might point this out!)
25
posted on
10/03/2003 11:23:34 AM PDT
by
Rutabega
(trapped in Sweden under marriage--hoping for parole by Spring '04!!!)
To: Republican Red
"protested against the right-wingers" Isn't Nazism extreme left-wing? NAZI stands for National Socialists Party National Socialist German Worker[s'] Party, yes.
But as a matter of convention, if debatable as to accuracy, German-language media refer to Nazis as extreme RIGHT-wing, and to socialists and communists as LEFT-wing. I see your point, though.
26
posted on
10/03/2003 11:25:46 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: ElkGroveDan
Come on Dan, get your spin right...He obviously showed up to grope hot fascist chicks.
27
posted on
10/03/2003 11:26:27 AM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: pogo101
I think there is a bigger issue... I don't think Arnold is a Nazi by ANY means. That's just ridiculous.
The bigger issue is his apparent infatuation with authoritarian figures. He also allegedly expressed admiration for Napolean, Cesar, Charlemein (sic), etc.
But then again, he isn't running for President. I think he will be sadly disappointed when he realizes just how little power a CA governor has.
28
posted on
10/03/2003 11:26:58 AM PDT
by
ambrose
To: Diamond
It's sorta like Pol Pot and his coalition of liberals and greens that killed 2 million in Cambodia.
To: ElkGroveDan
If this was about Bill Clinton and not Arnie Schwarzenegger, FReepers would be pounding "der schlickmeister", 24-7! Guaranteed.
The Arnie Android sycophants can't bring themsleves to face these releases about Arnie's past, even though it shows his viewpoints on politics and outlook on life itself. All this crap may have come late in the campaign, but Schwarzy's people knew, it would be coming nonetheless. I wonder how much else is out there, about this big jerk that people would find offensive and force them into taking a second look. For some Arnoldnauts, its too late. They can't backoff from supporting Arnie now. They'd look foolish if they did make such an abrupt aboutface.
30
posted on
10/03/2003 11:29:41 AM PDT
by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: ambrose
I expect him to be "3 years and out." Like Ventura, perhaps, albeit hopefully with better results than Ventura.
Thereafter ... Tom time?? :)
31
posted on
10/03/2003 11:31:01 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: pogo101
As I told Ambrose and suggested in my initial post, I wonder whether it happened at all. If Arnold did this and remembers it, then why wouldn't he have mentioned it
Yep. There are too many loose ends for this Hitler/Nazi thing to be cleared up over the weekend. Schwarzenegger's work with the Weisenthal center, however, is not in doubt. Barring some other, genuine smoking gun, I don't think this stuff hurts him much, but we'll see if it gets traction among the less-informed.
|
32
posted on
10/03/2003 11:31:14 AM PDT
by
Sabertooth
(No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
To: My2Cents
Headline in the NY Times on this story:
SCHWARTENEGGER: INTOLERENT TO DIVERSE POINTS OF VIEW!
33
posted on
10/03/2003 11:31:20 AM PDT
by
ibbryn
(this tag intentionally left blank)
To: pogo101
To try to keep things civil, although I don't really have any more respect for your hours of pinging and posting to trash Arnold than I had/have for those trashing Tom in various silly ways: My point was a valid one. Everyone keep saying that the actions of his youth are not relevant to today, and this pops up implying that the actions of his youth indicate what a special person he is. I was trying to make the point that they can't have it both ways.
And for the record, everything I have criticized him for is related to his policy positions and public behavior. I'm sure it sounds like "trash" to Arnold supporters because most are still in denial that they are supporting a very liberal candidate, with a shady past.
34
posted on
10/03/2003 11:34:20 AM PDT
by
ElkGroveDan
(It's time for Arnold to stop splitting the Republican vote and step aside for the good of the party)
To: martin_fierro
Du ist der Mensch! (You mean, "Du bist der Mensch.") Thanks! Have to scrape the rust off my German, as one private-messager put it. But bear in mind my caveat in #1: this may be a "helpful memory" by a pro-Arnold guy at work. Who knows?
35
posted on
10/03/2003 11:34:54 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: pogo101
Good find!
36
posted on
10/03/2003 11:40:44 AM PDT
by
slimer
(i'm mad as hell and i'm not going to take it anymore!)
To: ElkGroveDan
My point was a valid one. I agree about avoiding double standards, and some on FR appear to apply them. But I believe you obscuring your valid point -- that a candidate's past matters somewhat -- with your unmistakeable glee at the tarring of the person largely blamed for McClintock's not winning more GOP support in the recall race.
If your tone were more sober, if you at least acknowledged that the timing and, at least in part, the content of these smears are suspect, it'd go a long way towards civil discourse. But if you post smarm and sarcasm, it doesn't; it reveals only bitterness instead.
37
posted on
10/03/2003 11:41:32 AM PDT
by
pogo101
To: Reagan Man
It's funny. It's almost like the left and some on the right have switched sides. You have lefties saying he's unfit for governor because of his sexcapades (hypocrites), and you have Republicans saying "Can't we just move on? Personal behavior in the past has no connection with the job he will do" (hypocrites).
To: Diamond
Exactly. Hitler was a socialist.
39
posted on
10/03/2003 11:45:49 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: steve50
"Fascism: a system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism." American Heritage Dictionary (an older edition) The very essence of right wing is the seperation of government and business leadership. This isnt a difficult concept. BASIC knowledge and common sense stipulate that the rightwing keeps business away from government control and the leftwing merge them togethor.
You should do a little more research than opening up a dictionary. See how the NAZI's nationalized many industries, increased regulations and taxes, etc. etc. That is what they mean when they say merging business with government! Now what political spectrum advocates those policies???
In essence, fascism is merely Middle Way Socialism, how do i know, Because Mussolini coined the term. Now of course they call it THIRD WAY
40
posted on
10/03/2003 11:46:20 AM PDT
by
chudogg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson