Yes, Rush Limbaugh Was Right

You know conservatism at large is up in arms when you start receiving random press releases from organizations you’ve never heard from before. From the National Center for Public Policy Research: “ESPN Especially Hypocritical in Accepting Limbaugh’s Resignation While Its Website Raises the Same Issue Limbaugh Did.” The Center is referring to the fact ESPN Sports president George Bodenheimer called Rush Limbaugh’s resignation “the appropriate action to resolve the matter expeditiously” while asking in a poll question whether McNabb was overrated because of his race. The answer is, No. Donovan McNabb was overrated due in equal parts to his stellar college career at Syracuse and the general uselessness of the Philadelphia Eagles at the time they drafted McNabb in 1999, not because he was black.

But we’re getting too far ahead. In the first place, what did Limbaugh actually say that got him into this mess? Last Sunday on ESPN’s NFL Countdown: “I’ve listened to all you guys, actually, and I think the sum total of what you’re all saying is, Donovan McNabb is regressing, he’s going backwards. And my, I’m sorry to say this, I don’t think he’s been that good from the get-go. I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well … for instance, black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there is a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he really didn’t deserve … the defense carried this team, I think, and he got credit for it.” What about it?

Rush Limbaugh was right. Not as a matter of common conservative opinion, but statistically. In addressing the comments of the Countdown crew (Chris Berman, Steve Young, Michael Irvin and Tom Jackson), yes, McNabb is regressing. His stats so far this year compared to the average NFL quarterback: 506 total passing yards versus the 688 average; no touchdowns to the average 4; 141.7 yards per game versus the 190 average; 49.5 percentage of completed passes versus the average 59.4; a 51.1 quarterback rating versus the 79.4 average. Granted, the Eagles have played only three games in four weeks with 13 regular season games remaining, but as to the question of whether McNabb is regressing as of Friday, October third, the answer is yes.

To the offensive question, Slate.com’s Allen Barra made some pivotal points in a column dated October second, comparing McNabb – often referred to as one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL – to Brad Johnson, quarterback of the Super Bowl champion Tampa Bay Buccaneers. “I don’t know anyone who would call Brad Johnson … much more than mediocre. Yet, Johnson’s NFL career passer rating, as of last Sunday, is 7.3 points higher than McNabb’s (84.8 to 77.5), he has completed his passes at a higher rate (61.8 percent to 56.4 percent), and has averaged significantly more yards per pass (6.84 to 5.91). McNabb excels in just one area, running, where he gained 2,040 yards and scored 14 touchdowns to Johnson’s 467 and seven. But McNabb has also been sacked more frequently than Johnson – more than once, on average, per game, which negates much of the rushing advantage.” Barra is saying that McNabb gets much more attention because he’s the prototypical vision of a modern quarterback – one who rushes much more effectively than even quarterbacks drafted just a few years before – and he’s right.

As to the defensive question – that the Eagles defense deserves more credit for two consecutive NFC championship game appearances than anyone is saying – Limbaugh is also statistically correct. In the four years McNabb has owned the starting quarterback job (excluding the last six weeks of the 2002 regular season, when he had a broken leg), the Philadelphia defense has never ranked lower than 10th in yards allowed, even starting this season ranked fifth, despite being below the NFL average in interceptions, fumble recoveries, yards against, tackles, sacks and points against.

As to the racial question, I’ll defer again to Allen Barra, who covers sports for a living: “To pretend that many of us [in the media] didn't want McNabb to be the best quarterback in the NFL because he's black is absurd. To say that we shouldn't root for a quarterback to win because he's black is every bit as nonsensical as to say that we shouldn't have rooted for Jackie Robinson to succeed because he was black.”

"Please contribute to FreeRepublic and make these posts go away"

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!
Thanks Registered

he defense carried this team, I think, and he got credit for it.

Anybody look at the racial makeup up of the Eagles' defense???
Something like (don't quote me) 20 black, 3 white.
Any racism there?

"Rush Limbaugh was right. Not as a matter of common conservative opinion, but statistically."

Tony Snow substituted for Sean Hannity yesterday, and he too said this and said Rush was right.

any sports writer who calls a boxer "the great white hope"
is guilty of racism and should be fired.

The Eagles were also third in the league in points scored last year with McNabb as the primary weapon. He's QB rating was third in the NFC.

Unlike Johnson, he has never had a Randy Moss and Chris Carter to throw to or the best offensive coach in the game calling plays for him.

McNabb has never had a legitimate deep threat at receiver nor a top-10 running back to help carry the load. He's a good quarterback. It's impossible for him to be much better than without more talent around him.

I don't know if it is okay to post from slate.com here, but their sportswriter has a column today defending Rush not only on McNabbs stats, but also on the fact that many sportswriters 'root' for him in some part because he is black, kind of like a lot of people rooted for Jackie Robinson in part because he was black.

DUH!!!!

Of course 2 seconds after I wrote my post I read the *whole* article. Sorry.

/smoking crack

Anybody look at the racial makeup up of the Eagles' defense??? Something like (don't quote me) 20 black, 3 white. Any racism there?

No, what's considered "racist" is if you tell the truth about WHY this discrepancy exists.