[Fawnn]

Considering what has been going on this week with these MEDIA blasts against Arnold and Rush, I'd say the Dems are very busy.

Bombshell politics. They did it with dropping one about W's DUI shortly before the election. Gore announces he's buying a network and they bomb his biggest competitor (and the libs most out-spoken critic). It's almost election and they accuse Arnold of doing the things that are tame to what the feminists evidently found "macho" when Billy did 'em.

There's also divide and conquer techniques at play, too. I for one wish SOMEBODY would start a LIBERTINEIWANTLOTSOFDRUGS-ANDUNTILTHEMANQUITSSTOPPINGMETHROUGHHISUNFAIROPPRESSIVEDRUGLAWS-IAMGOINGTOWHINE.COM. I don't recall mention of legalizing drugs as a part of the conservative values for which FR was founded, yet those types seem to be the ones who hijack so many of these threads.

[Mo1]

Question .. how accurate is the story that the Enquire knew about this story for two years

[dead]

I don't recall mention of legalizing drugs as a part of the conservative values for which FR was founded, yet those types seem to be the ones who hijack so many of these threads.

You could always ask the founder of this website about it.

"There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution that authorizes the federal government to wage war against the citizens of the United States, no matter how well-meaning the intent. The Bill of Rights means just as much today, as it did on the day it was written. And its protections are just as valid and just as important to freedom today, as they were to our Founders two hundred years ago. The danger of the drug war is that it erodes away those rights. Once the fourth amendment is meaningless, it's just that much easier to erode away the first and then the second, etc. Soon we'll have no rights at all. "

Jim Robinson, 5/9/01

source: Personal attacks, petty (and not so petty) bickering, flame wars, feuding, etc.

---