Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leak Probe May Expand Beyond White House [Pentagon,State Dept.]
Associated Press ^ | October 2, 2003 | Curt Anderson

Posted on 10/02/2003 11:07:09 AM PDT by AntiGuv

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The investigation into the leak of a CIA officer's name is likely to expand to other Bush administration agencies, including the State and Defense departments, officials said Thursday.

A senior Justice Department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said those agencies, and possibly others, could get letters urging officials to preserve documents such as phone logs and not to delete e-mails. Similar letters have already gone to the White House and CIA.

Defense Department officials confirmed Thursday they were told to expect such a letter. At the State Department, spokeswoman Susan Pittman said she did not know if a letter had been received but that the agency "would cooperate fully" if asked.

Preventing loss of evidence is a key piece of the early stage of the FBI's investigation, which is focused at the outset on narrowing the list of government officials who may have known the CIA officer's identity.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan told reporters Thursday that the White House had not received any subpoenas in the investigation and that, to his knowledge, no staffers had been interviewed by the FBI.

The FBI has assembled a team of about a half-dozen experienced agents to handle the investigation into who leaked the name of a CIA officer married to former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson. Wilson had accused the Bush administration of manipulating intelligence to exaggerate the threat posed by Iraq.

The officer's name, Valerie Plame, first appeared in a July 14 story by syndicated columnist Robert Novak, and she was identified later by Newsday as an undercover officer.

In Congress, Democrats and Republicans sparred over whether a special counsel should be appointed to investigate. Democrats contend an agency headed by Bush appointees cannot adequately investigate the administration. Republicans have labeled that claim politically motivated.

Overseeing the investigation is John Dion, a 30-year career prosecutor who has headed the counterespionage section at the Justice Department since 2002. FBI agents from the counterintelligence and inspections division and from the Washington field office will do the legwork.

The FBI, which can use grand jury subpoenas to compel disclosure of any evidence, has regularly used polygraph tests in investigations involving classified information. Asked Wednesday if White House staff members would submit to lie detector tests if requested, McClellan called the question "hypothetical."

"We will cooperate fully with the investigation and make sure that we preserve the integrity of the investigation," he said.

The White House and the Republican National Committee turned up the heat Wednesday on Wilson. The GOP's communication office highlighted remarks in which Wilson backtracked from his original assertion that Karl Rove, Bush's chief political strategist, was responsible for the leak.

McClellan told reporters that Wilson "has said a lot of things and then backed away from what he said. So I think part of your role is to do some further questioning there."

Novak, in a column published Wednesday, wrote that he discovered Plame's identity when talking with a senior administration official about why Wilson, who had been part of President Clinton's National Security Council, had been chosen to investigate allegations that Iraq tried to buy uranium from Niger.

A second official confirmed that Wilson's wife was a CIA officer, Novak wrote, adding that the CIA itself never suggested to him that publication of her name would endanger anyone. Novak also wrote that the officer's identity was widely known in Washington.

Former Attorney General Janet Reno, in June 2000 testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the pool of potential leakers in any administration is so big it makes most leak investigations impractical.

"Almost all leak investigations are closed without having identified a suspect," she said.

Justice Department guidelines allow for journalists to be subpoenaed only on rare occasions, after all reasonable attempts are made to obtain the information from other sources.

Newsday Editor Howard Schneider said the newspaper had not been contacted by the Justice Department and that its reporters were continuing to pursue the leak story.

An ABC-Washington Post poll found 69 percent of Americans, including 52 percent of Republicans, believe a special counsel should be appointed. A substantial majority, 72 percent, said it's likely that someone in the White House leaked the classified information, but only 34 percent think it's likely Bush knew about the leak beforehand.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cia; fbi; pentagon; plamenameblamegame; state; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: Dog
"in which the Justice Dept will seek the Wilson's phone records."

This could be interesting. Hmmm...isn't that Begala and Carville's numbers?
61 posted on 10/02/2003 12:03:39 PM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Not surprising. Aren't there alot of people in State that have a problem or two with this admin?
62 posted on 10/02/2003 12:04:20 PM PDT by b4its2late (I don't do drugs. I get the same effect just standing up fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khaibit
That said, journalistic confidentiality does not extend to crimes. Technically, he could be ordered to disclose his source and held in contempt of court for refusing. Others have suggested that since Plame worked on WMD non-proliferation it could be considered 'harming efforts against terrorism' and he could be charged under the USA Patriot Act.

This doesn't just stop at Novak. Isn't it possible that the 6 other reported journalist could fall under this umbrella?

Wilson said he was going to tell the FBI their names

63 posted on 10/02/2003 12:05:36 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
Personally, I think whoever talked to Novak should just come out and admit they mentioned Mrs Wilson, explain that they had no idea she might be undercover but thought she was just an analyst, and proclaim their huge remorse for any problems this caused.

This little spectacle would be history by the end of the week..
64 posted on 10/02/2003 12:05:46 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: piasa; Grampa Dave; seamole; mrustow; Sabertooth; Miss Marple; Reb Raider; MizSterious; Endeavor; ..

This is the Plame Name Blame Game ping list.
Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
You may also find all posts to this ping list by searching on keyword PLAMENAMEBLAMEGAME.

Note this is a HIGH-VOLUME ping list!
Please ping me to any Plame/Wilson threads!
There is no way I can catch them all myself!!


65 posted on 10/02/2003 12:07:38 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JDGreen123
Matthews has had it in for Scooter for quite some time.
66 posted on 10/02/2003 12:07:57 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
From what I've read of the anti-outing statute, it has never been successfully enforced because it sets a very high bar for prosecutors. A prosecutor must prove malicious intent, that a tangible breach of national security has occurred, that the "outed" agent was critical to the success of a covert operation, and that the person doing the leak had full knowledge of the outed agent's role and significance. It is possible that NONE of those criteria apply here. (I admit I didn't articulate them very well, but they are something like what I stated.)
67 posted on 10/02/2003 12:07:57 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mo1; Khaibit; ironman
Isn't it possible that the 6 other reported journalist could fall under this umbrella?

Yep, it's not just possible, but guaranteed. BTW, one journalist who's stated she was contacted on the matter is Andrea Mitchell of NBC News - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan's wife.....

68 posted on 10/02/2003 12:08:32 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: JDGreen123
" . . . and stopped just short of saying "Yes it is Scooter Libby, Dick Cheney's top assistant."

Was Libby mentioned by name? If so, why?
69 posted on 10/02/2003 12:11:11 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Hmmmmm ... this could get really interesting
70 posted on 10/02/2003 12:12:00 PM PDT by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Was Libby mentioned by name? If so, why?

Yep, I saw the segment. The CIA guy was ranting about the VPs office, and then Pat Buchanan asked him to confirm or deny that he was implicating Scooter Libby, and the CIA guy said "no comment" (but that he would be telling the FBI what he knew)...

71 posted on 10/02/2003 12:13:08 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I thought Mitchell said she was contacted AFTER Novak's article had already run.
72 posted on 10/02/2003 12:13:21 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
I don't like the sound of this. I wouldn't trust anyone named Scooter Libby. Sounds too much like Bebe Rebozo.
73 posted on 10/02/2003 12:15:05 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Mitchell did say that, however she would still get encompassed by any subpoenaes related to knowledge that pertains to whatever crime may've been committed...
74 posted on 10/02/2003 12:15:14 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
"Mitchell did say that, however she would still get encompassed by any subpoenaes related to knowledge that pertains to whatever crime may've been committed..."

That's probably true.
75 posted on 10/02/2003 12:16:58 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle (uo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Maybe she tipped off old Scooter's name to her NBC pals, Buchanan & Press and Matthews
76 posted on 10/02/2003 12:17:24 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
"If they are civil employees he can't get rid of them all due to the Pendleton Act"

/Clinton is the first prez to convert his political appointees into civil servants in the waning hours of his administration. All Bush needs to do is "downsize government" a bit and he can clean the 'rats out. They're least senior. Let's roll.

77 posted on 10/02/2003 12:23:12 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Aaron0617
Beyond the White House? Not accorinding to our friend Pat B

Pat Buchanan just announced on MSNBC that Bush already KNOWS who the leaker is. Buchanan wants Bush to announce it and fire them.

I don't know how Pat knew that but...he just said it.

78 posted on 10/02/2003 12:27:02 PM PDT by Aaron0617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
I am trying to find a transcript. The agent was asked directly is the leaker Scooter Libby. He could not say yes I guess since he feared a lawsuit but basically confirmed the charge.
79 posted on 10/02/2003 12:28:54 PM PDT by JDGreen123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik
After the Jayson Blair debacle - no member of the press should have ammunity. It's far to easy to say "un-named sources told me" and then not have to prove it. Sorry, I don't trust nor believe anyone in the press - other than maybe Brit Hume.
80 posted on 10/02/2003 12:29:02 PM PDT by Elkiejg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson