Skip to comments.
O'Reilly Accuses Franken of Launching a Dirty Tricks Campaign
imdb ^
| 09/30/2003
| Unknown
Posted on 10/01/2003 9:01:25 AM PDT by RightWingAtheist
Bill O'Reilly has told Time magazine that he has no regrets about pushing Fox News's lawsuit against Al Franken. "This man is being run by some very powerful forces in this country, and we needed to confront it," O'Reilly maintained. He did not define the "powerful forces." O'Reilly compared Franken with Donald Segretti, the "political prankster" who served four and a half months in prison on charges of dispensing false campaign literature for Richard Nixon. "Franken's job is to do exactly what Donald Segretti did for Nixon -- dig up dirt on people. He is not a satirist; he is not a comedian. He's someone who wants to injure people's reputations."
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: blowhards; foxnews; franken; oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
I'm not a fan of O'Reilly, but no one has offered a truer assesment of Franken's agenda.
To: RightWingAtheist
Donald Segretti I had the opportunity to work with him in the last 5 years. A very nice man.
To: RightWingAtheist
"He's someone who wants to injure people's reputations."
This coming from the man [O'Reilly] who growled on-air to that kindly Neal Boortz, "you're a vicious SOB."
O'Reilly is a typical "do as I say, not as I do" type.
3
posted on
10/01/2003 9:06:43 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
VLWC?
4
posted on
10/01/2003 9:09:42 AM PDT
by
Marc Poor
To: TheOtherOne
I think it was a guy named Dick Tuck who was the original political prankster who bedeviled Nixon in his 1960 campaign. It was what prompted Nixon to pursue dirty tricks during his 1972 campaign.
5
posted on
10/01/2003 9:13:59 AM PDT
by
RonBomb
To: TomGuy
"This man is being run by some very powerful forces in this country, and we needed to confront it," O'Reilly maintained. New Headline: Pot confronts kettle
6
posted on
10/01/2003 9:17:31 AM PDT
by
steve50
(Power takes as ingratitude the writhing of it's victims : Tagore)
To: TheOtherOne
ugly! This Franken guy is soooooooooooo ugly I cant even stand to listen to him.
I hope we fix his ass but good! and then we will get wilson.
he he he he ha ha ha ha
after we capture CA and make them kiss Bush
7
posted on
10/01/2003 9:38:48 AM PDT
by
hapy
To: RightWingAtheist
Prankin' Al Franken told Howard Kurtz that his letter to Ashcroft was not a lie, it was a prank. I think it was a
Frankenprank
Franken shouldn't have any problem playing Tricks this Halloween.
8
posted on
10/01/2003 9:43:24 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Prankin' Al Franken said---My letter to Ashcroft was not a lie...it was a prank. 9/7/03 to H Kurtz)
To: RightWingAtheist
O'Reilly should just shut his fat mouth. I heard his latest rant about the black sportsman today. Guy is a complete maroon.
9
posted on
10/01/2003 9:46:05 AM PDT
by
jjbrouwer
(Chelsea for the Champions League!)
To: jjbrouwer
Right on! O'Reilly is an embarrassment to conservatives by embodying so many of the stereotypes the left relishes attacking. To his credit, however, he has tackled some tough subjects, though so many reflect the "Inside Edition sensationality" of his former program.
Just one correction: For my money, the Guy is a complete macaroon.
10
posted on
10/01/2003 10:17:27 AM PDT
by
OESY
To: RonBomb
I think it was a guy named Dick Tuck who was the original political prankster who bedeviled Nixon in his 1960 campaign. It was what prompted Nixon to pursue dirty tricks during his 1972 campaign.I remember Dick Tuck too. During his 1968 campaign, Nixon used the slogan "Nixon's the One!" However, thanks to Dick Tuck it kind of backfired on him when Tuck arranged for a number of pregnant women to parade around in front of the 'pubbies convention carrying signs with that particular slogan on them.
11
posted on
10/01/2003 10:35:51 AM PDT
by
SamKeck
(The battle for Helms Deep is over and the battle for Middle Earth has begun.)
To: RightWingAtheist
Al,
You're ugly enough, you're ignorant enough, and dog gone it, liberals like you.
12
posted on
10/01/2003 10:37:19 AM PDT
by
Rockitz
(After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
To: OESY
O'Reilly is a registered Independent. He is not a Conservative.
To: Keeper of the Turf
Actually, he was a registered Republican up until the mid 1990's when he switched his registration to Independent.
To: RightWingAtheist
Bill should shut up until he can say for sure who these "powerful forces" are and how they influence Franken. If he was a guest on his own show, he would be asked to bring in some evidence before making such claims. I really dislike O'Reilly, and I think Frankens criticisms of him were sound.
15
posted on
10/01/2003 10:47:51 AM PDT
by
Kleon
(To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle.)
To: RightWingAtheist
O'Reilly is O.K. He'd be beter if he toned down his "i am the greatest" attitude.
16
posted on
10/01/2003 10:49:16 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
He'd be better if he let up on his "everyone is subject to the harsh light of media scrutiny EXCEPT ME" routine. What a thin-skinned a**hole.
17
posted on
10/01/2003 10:51:58 AM PDT
by
lugsoul
(And I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin on the mountainside)
To: jjbrouwer
...I heard his latest rant about the black sportsman today...Did he make an observation on Limbaugh's portrayal of McNabb or did he make an original rant?
18
posted on
10/01/2003 10:56:03 AM PDT
by
harrowup
(I'm so perfect I am naturally humble.)
To: RightWingAtheist
On Howard Stern today, O'Reilly explained that he needs armed guards because the rap music industry, foreigners, and people who disagreed with him all want to kill him.
19
posted on
10/01/2003 10:59:35 AM PDT
by
dead
(Valerie Plame is a spy. Pass it on.)
To: dead
On Howard Stern today, O'Reilly explained that he needs armed guards because the rap music industry, foreigners, and people who disagreed with him all want to kill him. I saw him speak to the NYS Broadcasters at their convention in Lake George this summer. He didn't have any guards, but then again the crowd didn't appear to fit any of those categories.
20
posted on
10/01/2003 11:04:08 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson