Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VeriSign tapped to secure Internet voting
MSNBC-CNET ^ | 9/29/03 | Robert Lemos

Posted on 09/30/2003 12:52:58 PM PDT by honeygrl

VeriSign announced Monday that it will provide key components of a system designed to let Americans abroad cast absentee votes over the Internet.

The contract was granted by consulting firm Accenture, which is working with the U.S. Department of Defense on a voting system known as the Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment. When completed, the system will allow absentee military personnel and overseas Americans from eight participating states to cast their votes in the 2004 general election.

"The solution we are building will enable absentee voters to exercise their right to vote," said George Schu, a vice president at VeriSign. "The sanctity of the vote can't be compromised nor can the integrity of the system be compromised--it's security at all levels."

VeriSign has been selected to host the servers and information needed to authenticate voters and ensure that they cast only one vote. Internet and electronic voting systems are notoriously hard to secure. In July, researchers at Johns Hopkins University raised extensive security issues with a leading electronic voting system manufactured by Diebold Election Systems.

Schu stressed that several layers of security will prevent hackers from accessing the system. VeriSign will house the security servers in its own hosting centers. The company will ask military personnel to use their Common Access Cards--the latest form of ID for the military--to access the system and cast a vote. Civilians will use digital signatures.

Overseas U.S. citizens from Arkansas, Florida, Hawaii, Minnesota, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Washington will be able to use the system to cast votes.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electronicvoting; verisign
This sounds like a *bad* idea.
1 posted on 09/30/2003 12:52:58 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
and I did a search for verisign to see if this was already posted.. I didn't find anything so hope it's not a repeat post.
2 posted on 09/30/2003 12:53:41 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
Wonder if this will offset the many Democrat votes that are now from the Great Beyond.
3 posted on 09/30/2003 12:56:49 PM PDT by N. Theknow (Excuses are like a$$h*les. Everybody's got one and they all stink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
The contract was granted by consulting firm Accenture, which is working with the U.S. Department of Defense on a voting system known as the Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment.

Bwwahhhaaaa!!! Accenture was formerly known as Anderson Consulting, a spinoff of the Arthur Anderson accounting firm.

Great PR from the Defense Department. (BTW, why is the Defense Department building a voting system?)

4 posted on 09/30/2003 12:57:56 PM PDT by dead (All that is not mandatory is prohibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
So there could be no more stories of missing military ballets like there was in the elecion of 2000.
5 posted on 09/30/2003 12:59:33 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
elecion = election
6 posted on 09/30/2003 1:00:04 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl; billbears; 4ConservativeJustices
VeriSign announced Monday that it will provide key components of a system designed to let Americans abroad cast absentee votes over the Internet.

"Se habla espanol." Dims will be back in power thanx to all the south-of-the-border voting. Who needs that ol' Voter News Service?

7 posted on 09/30/2003 1:00:21 PM PDT by Ff--150 (we have been fed with milk, not meat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
If they let me work on the thing I'd make it secure all right!

I'd have a magic backdoor which would allow me to specify the percentage of votes cast for the Democrat that I wanted counted for the Conservative/Republican.

ML/NJ

8 posted on 09/30/2003 1:10:00 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
Many elections are close. To cheat doesn't appear to take much. Counting "overseas" absentees should be a good cover story for fraud.
9 posted on 09/30/2003 1:10:52 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
"Many elections are close. To cheat doesn't appear to take much. Counting "overseas" absentees should be a good cover story for fraud."

Remember WI, MI, IO, IL and several others in the 2000 Election? The Dems won by just enough to be within or almost within the recount range.

With electronic voting with paperless ballots and ether-ballots, you will be seeing more and more close votes...for the Dems. The question is: how do you have or call for a recount of electronic votes, ether-votes, paperless-hard-copy-less ballots that are in a server?

10 posted on 09/30/2003 1:22:20 PM PDT by KriegerGeist ("The weapons of our warefare are not carnal, but mighty though God for pulling down of strongholds")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
This is the same Verisign that broke many (most?) of the spam filters on the Internet last week? The same Verisign that uses blatantly fraudulent invoices to steal domain name business from mom 'n pop outfits? The same Verisign reviled by IT peeps 'round the world for their creepy marketing practices?

I can't think of a worse company to use for any part of e-voting. I'd a-ruther have that bastich Clintoon count my votes! Or even someone named Chad from Florida!!

11 posted on 09/30/2003 1:22:21 PM PDT by Mudcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: honeygrl
FYI: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/985880/posts
13 posted on 09/30/2003 1:25:48 PM PDT by Mudcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
Thanks for that link. I just added *://*.verisign.com to my blocked sites list in IE. Sitefinder won't get anymore traffic from me. :)
14 posted on 09/30/2003 2:04:14 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
How are the Floridians going to use something so complicated as this? Obviously, there will be Florida citizens on vacation overseas at that time of year. Something doesn't smell right to me here.
15 posted on 09/30/2003 2:05:26 PM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudcat
How true... Verisign is the closest thing to an organized criminal enterprise that we've seen since the Enron debacle.
16 posted on 09/30/2003 2:40:10 PM PDT by The Electrician
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
So if I'm a dead person, how do I vote using this new system? Surely we aren't ending a great American tradition :)
17 posted on 09/30/2003 6:57:38 PM PDT by upchuck (Wanna make the Taglinus FreeRepublicus list? Simple-just jiggle jigsaw with yer credit card number :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
I don't trust VeriSign. They just hijacked the internet a few weeks ago and still are holding it hostage: VeriSign Sued Over Controversial Web Service
18 posted on 10/01/2003 6:48:36 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: honeygrl
This sounds like a *bad* idea.

I wouldn't mind having some sort of electronic voting system (with paper backup) for the military; if the military chain of command can't be trusted not to commit hanky panky in an election, there are bigger problems than just voting. On the other hand, extending it for other Americans who just so happen to be abroad in Nigeria is just asking for trouble.

19 posted on 10/07/2003 5:27:27 PM PDT by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson