Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gallup: Either McClintock or Schwarzenegger Likely Winner in California if Other Dropped Out
Gallup ^ | 9-30-03 | Gallup

Posted on 09/29/2003 9:41:43 PM PDT by ambrose

T H E   G A L L U P   O R G A N I Z A T I O N

SOURCE: http://www.gallup.com
CONTACT INFORMATION:

Media Relations 1-202-715-3030
Subscriber Relations 1-888-274-5447
World Headquarters
901 F Street
Washington, DC 20004


 


 

 

POLL ANALYSES

Either McClintock or Schwarzenegger Likely Winner in California if Other Dropped Out
Most of vote for one candidate would go to other

GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- With Arnold Schwarzenegger the Republican front-runner in the California gubernatorial contest, many GOP officials have pressured California State Sen. Tom McClintock to drop out of the race, fearing he will divide the Republican vote and allow Democratic Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante to win. A CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, conducted over the past weekend, shows that McClintock does indeed draw support away from Schwarzenegger, though not enough to deprive the actor of the lead. But the poll also shows that if Schwarzenegger were not in the race, McClintock would likely be in first place by a substantial margin rather than behind Bustamante.

The poll of California voters, conducted Sept. 25-27, finds McClintock with just 16% of the vote among registered voters, and 18% among probable voters. That puts him in third place behind Bustamante and Schwarzenegger.

Next, I'm going to read a list of some of the 135 candidates running to replace Gray Davis as governor if he is removed from office. After I read these names, please tell me which of these candidates you would be most likely to vote for if the election were held today, if you would vote for someone else, or if you would not vote for anyone for governor. [ROTATED: Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican; Lieutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante, a Democrat; Columnist AriannaHuffington, an independent; State Senator Tom McClintock, a Republican; and Financial Advisor, Peter Miguel Camejo of the Green Party] (If someone else, who do you plan to vote for?)

Schwarz-
enegger


Busta-
mante


McClin-
tock


Camejo


Huff-
ington

OTHER
(vol.)

None/
No opinion

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

34

28

16

4

2

2

14

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

40

25

18

5

2

1

9

The third-place showing by McClintock underestimates his overall strength. Both Republican candidates enjoy a favorable rating among more than 6 in 10 probable voters, while fewer than 4 in 10 probable voters give Bustamante a favorable rating. Of the three leading contenders, McClintock has the lowest negatives. Only 20% of probable voters have an unfavorable view of McClintock, compared with a 30% unfavorable rating for Schwarzenegger and 54% unfavorable for Bustamante.

Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of [NAME], or have you never heard of this person?

Arnold Schwarzenegger

Favorable

Unfavorable

Never heard of

No opinion

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

59

31

1

9

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

63

30

*

7

* Less than 0.5%

Tom McClintock

Favorable

Unfavorable

Never heard of

No opinion

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

58

18

7

17

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

62

20

4

14

Cruz Bustamante

Favorable

Unfavorable

Never heard of

No opinion

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

44

46

3

7

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

37

54

3

6

Furthermore, when McClintock is pitted against just Bustamante, among probable voters the Republican state senator beats the Democratic candidate handily -- by 19 percentage points.

If the choice were between Cruz Bustamante, the Democrat and Tom McClintock, the Republican, who would you be more likely to vote for [ROTATED -- Cruz Bustamante, (or) Tom McClintock]?


Bustamante


McClintock

NEITHER (vol.)

OTHER
(vol.)

No
opinion

%

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

42

49

6

*

3

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

37

56

5

*

2

(vol.) Volunteered response

* Less than 0.5%

On the other hand, the poll shows Schwarzenegger would also beat Bustamante in a two-man race among probable voters -- but by a slightly larger 22-point margin (58% to 36%).

If the choice were between Cruz Bustamante, the Democrat and Arnold Schwarzenegger, the Republican, who would you be more likely to vote for [ROTATED: Cruz Bustamante, (or) Arnold Schwarzenegger]?


Bustamante


Schwarzen-
egger

NEITHER (vol.)

OTHER
(vol.)

No
opinion

%

%

%

%

%

Registered Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

39

52

6

*

3

Probable Voters

2003 Sep 25-27

36

58

4

*

2

(vol.) Volunteered response

* Less than 0.5%

If Schwarzenegger were to drop out of the race (and all other candidates remained), McClintock would pick up 64% of the actor's vote, while Bustamante would get just 6% of that vote. The net result would be a 48% to 31% lead by McClintock over Bustamante.

On the other hand, if McClintock were to drop out of the race, Schwarzenegger would get a majority of the probable vote. Just over 62% of the state senator's support would go to Schwarzenegger, while only 8% would go to Bustamante -- leaving the actor with a 56% to 29% lead over Bustamante.

Thus, while either Republican could probably win if the other dropped out, GOP leaders are pressuring McClintock -- the slightly weaker candidate according to this poll -- to quit the race in order to ensure a Republican victory. The fact that he would be such a strong candidate without Schwarzenegger may help to explain why McClintock has been so reluctant to accede to the GOP leaders' wishes.

Survey Methods

These results are based on telephone interviews with a randomly selected sample of 1,007 Californians, aged 18 years and older, conducted Sept. 25-27, 2003. For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum error attributable to sampling and other random effects is ±3 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

For results based on the sample of 787 Californians who are registered to vote, the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

Probable voters include a subsample of 581 survey respondents deemed most likely to vote in the October 7, 2003 California recall election, based on their level of interest and intention to vote. This definition assumes a turnout of 51% in the recall election. For results based on the sample of probable voters, one can say with 95% confidence that the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

This poll was conducted in both English and Spanish -- 73 out of 1,007 interviews were conducted in Spanish.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bustamante; gallup; graydavis; mcclintock; polls; recall; schwarzenegger; tomcanwin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last
To: Texasforever
I don't think so, but Simon is not McClintock. One is an empty suit with some other flaws, and one isn't. One is facing an election with issues to play to his strong suit, and as I said, the other was an empty suit.
21 posted on 09/29/2003 9:53:59 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
The boat has left the dock. Deal with it.
22 posted on 09/29/2003 9:54:43 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
You make sense for once. What's gotten over you?
23 posted on 09/29/2003 9:55:51 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: halfdome
Thanks for the ping. Interesting since McClintock has been treated like a spoiler. If he could pick up those undecideds he'd really have a chance in the 3-way race.
24 posted on 09/29/2003 9:57:10 PM PDT by jtill (Those who love the Lord never meet for the last time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Ah yes, the Schwarzentitanic on its maiden voyage.

I'm not sailing.

25 posted on 09/29/2003 9:57:11 PM PDT by Kevin Curry (McClintock would not only win, he would win in a landslide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: South40
Well, SOuth, it seems that you are wrong.
26 posted on 09/29/2003 9:57:18 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
I support McClintock and he's shown how important MOMENTUM is. So to honor him I'll be voting for Schwarzenneger.

That plus in a normal election Tom wouldn't have gotten the free pass from the press and the left that he's been getting. Notice the media has hardly made a peep about his acceptance of Indian gaming money. You know the same issue that's cause Bustamante's number sto sink.

It's like this neither Arnold nor Tom is going to drop out. And hypothetically if Arnold did. Tom would be an easier target to sink than the Titanic because he poses himself up to be such a righteous moral upstanding guy. Which the media would have a hay day of tearing apart.

Arnold on the other hand has not made such grand overtures of false piety and has been much more resilant to slander.
27 posted on 09/29/2003 9:58:18 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Torie



At the moment McClintock would be elected

There you go again, ya paleo.


28 posted on 09/29/2003 9:58:20 PM PDT by Sabertooth (No Drivers' Licences for Illegal Aliens. Petition SB60. http://www.saveourlicense.com/n_home.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ambrose

29 posted on 09/29/2003 9:58:28 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (No animals were killed or harmed while making this tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
McClintock can beat Bustamante by a landslide

Ridiculous.
He might beat him in a race to the refrigerator, but that's it.

30 posted on 09/29/2003 9:59:52 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Torie
One is facing an election with issues to play to his strong suit, and as I said, the other was an empty suit.

Well during the primaries the true-believers sure didn't call him an "empty suit". They waited until the general election to turn on him. As to McClintock, I see him as the California version of Ron Paul. A good niche candidate but mid-level all the way. If you haven't gained rising star status in 20 years you are just not going to get there. Having said that, it may be fine for Arnold to step aside and let the conventional wisdom about conservatives in California be validated or debunked for a while. The fact is that the odds are still in Bustemante’s favor if both stay in the race.

31 posted on 09/29/2003 10:00:11 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: fqued
It means Busty and Davis are dispiesed. Davis for obvious reason and Busty more so of recent for his big Indian gaming money fiasco. Although the press has been rather quiet about implicating Tom McClintock in on that whole deal. I think that they were going to save that for if Arnold were to leave the race. We've seen how much it's damaged Busty.
32 posted on 09/29/2003 10:01:13 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: It's me
Well, SOuth, it seems that you are wrong.

Hardly. You can buy the CNN poll if you'd like. I'll stick to the long held position that it's a liberal spin machine...which it is.

33 posted on 09/29/2003 10:01:23 PM PDT by South40 (Vote Mcclintock, elect bustamante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
If the McClintock camp is gullible enough to buy into this tripe, they deserve the good laughs folks will have at their expense. Their willingness to grasp at any straw never ceases to amaze me. Don't mention crossover votes anyone, or you'll be Satan's spawn to them. Yes, it stands to reason, Schwarzenegger pulling twice the votes they are, is very likely to stand down for Tom. Here's to a lively thread without any further imput from me. Enjoy.
34 posted on 09/29/2003 10:01:46 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
Expediency vs. principle
If Supreme Court puts recall back on track, a crucial choice looms Oct. 7
By DOUG GAMBLE 9/16/03
The former writer for President Reagan lives in Carmel.

Assuming the U.S. Supreme Court overturns the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and puts the California recall election back on track, and state Sen. Tom McClintock stays in the race, Republicans will have to choose between expediency and principle Oct. 7. At the moment, expediency is leading in the polls.

If this were a primary, the conservative bent of state Republicans would probably mean a McClintock victory over Arnold Schwarzenegger. But since the candidate receiving the most votes becomes governor if Gray Davis is recalled, conservatives are tempted to give Schwarzenegger a free pass on ideology just to have a Republican as chief executive.

Even if it means postponing a GOP governorship until January 2007 - and I believe a conservative running a smart campaign can win statewide office in this state - I hope California Republicans will match McClintock's principled stand on the issues with principles of their own and vote for him over a watered-down Republican whose unofficial campaign slogan seems to be, "Details, schmetails." If he were Arnold Schwarzenegger, insurance agent, instead of Arnold Schwarzenegger, actor, his campaign would be a joke and unworthy of coverage.

The fact is his support is built entirely on a foundation of celebrity. How else to explain the all- news channels breaking away from regular programming to cover live the actor's every utterance before a microphone? It is only a movie star's fame that makes him more media-worthy than McClintock.

When Schwarzenegger is greeted at campaign events by throngs of squealing teen-age girls and crowds pressing forward for handshakes and autographs, it has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with fame. The actor's calculation, probably correct, is that in our celebrity-obsessed culture, star appeal trumps substance.

Those who vote for Schwarzenegger will do so without really knowing what they'll be getting. He still speaks in vague generalities and has not spelled out the particulars of achieving stated goals. According to TV ads that contain more fluff than the lint filter of an overused clothes dryer, his entire solution to the budget deficit is to "open the books."

He has said nothing about what programs he'll cut, and, although he insists he won't raise taxes, I don't believe him.

Particularly irksome is his decision to duck all but one of the scheduled debates. What other than political cowardice and contempt for the voters would cause a candidate to pass up opportunities to make his case before a statewide TV audience, a viewership made all the larger by interest in the recall? And what credible candidate would refuse to hold a news conference at a party's state convention as Schwarzenegger did last weekend?

Yet even such solid Republicans as Orange County Rep. Dana Rohrabacher and conservative spitfire Ann Coulter seem to have fallen under the Schwarzenegger celebrity spell, backing a candidate who is pro-abortion, favors gun control and gay adoptions and is to the left of Sen. Dianne Feinstein on school vouchers.

Schwarzenegger is compared to Ronald Reagan, but the real Reagan Republican in this race is McClintock, a courageous fighter against big government and higher taxes for over two decades. Also, it is McClintock who has seen a recent surge in poll numbers while Schwarzenegger's have remained relatively stagnant. But apparently no good work goes unpunished as the California GOP sees it, so it's the genuine Republican the party wants to boot to the sidelines.

If enough Republicans vote for Schwarzenegger, he may become governor, but at what cost to the party's soul? Their votes will decide if conservative principles are worth fighting for or whether most California Republicans are just star-struck groupies.

http://www.ocregister.com
35 posted on 09/29/2003 10:02:30 PM PDT by kellynla (USMC "C" 1/5 1st Mar Div. Viet Nam '69 & '70 Semper Fi VOTE4MCCLINTOCK http://www.tommcclintock.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

McClintock would win by a landslide.

So why support Arnold? Is it because he favors strict gun cotrols? Is it because he wants to legitimize illegal aliens and pick up their education and medical expenses on the public dime? Is it because he will "never forgive" the Republican Party for supporting the impeachment of vile liar Bill Clinton? Maybe it's because sexual perversion fits his definition of wholesome family values and he supports every kinky definition of marriage and partnership that can be brainstormed? Or is it that he's given the "right wing crazies" their comeuppance for daring to suggest in a colorblind society government shouldn't be allowed to collect divisive race-related data on its citizens? Is it because he supports big government nanny-state programs such as elder-care, day-care, and runaway public funding of the bloated, ghastly, inefficient child-destroying teachers union-dominated education system?

Please tell me: what is the attraction of Arnold Schwarzenegger to a clear-thinking conservative anyway?

36 posted on 09/29/2003 10:02:35 PM PDT by Kevin Curry (McClintock would not only win, he would win in a landslide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tempest
Tom McClintock has taught me the importance of MOMENTUM and the poll clearly shows that Arnold Schwarzenneger has the momentum to win.

The problem though, Tempest, is that you have been conveniently shoved into a teapot.

Tom McClintock would have been beating McCainenneger and Bustamywallet if the RINO guns weren't all firing simultanteously at the true Conservative in the race and shooting us all in the foot in the process.

37 posted on 09/29/2003 10:02:50 PM PDT by Outraged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture

38 posted on 09/29/2003 10:05:50 PM PDT by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
You make sense for once. What's gotten over you?

Oh you wouldn't like my motives. I don't think McClintock has a mouse’s chance in a room full of cats, I just want to put a lid on the "purists" for awhile after they lose the governorship twice in two years against an incumbent with a 30% approval rating.

39 posted on 09/29/2003 10:06:34 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Please tell me: what is the attraction of Arnold Schwarzenegger to a clear-thinking conservative anyway?

He can win and help my beloved State. Period.

40 posted on 09/29/2003 10:07:11 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson